Perspective: Guiding Principles for the Implementation of Personalized Nutrition Approaches That Benefit Health and Function

ABSTRACT Personalized nutrition (PN) approaches have been shown to help drive behavior change and positively influence health outcomes. This has led to an increase in the development of commercially available PN programs, which utilize various forms of individual-level information to provide services and products for consumers. The lack of a well-accepted definition of PN or an established set of guiding principles for the implementation of PN creates barriers for establishing credibility and efficacy. To address these points, the North American Branch of the International Life Sciences Institute convened a multidisciplinary panel. In this article, a definition for PN is proposed: "Personalized nutrition uses individual-specific information, founded in evidence-based science, to promote dietary behavior change that may result in measurable health benefits." In addition, 10 guiding principles for PN approaches are proposed: 1) define potential users and beneficiaries; 2) use validated diagnostic methods and measures; 3) maintain data quality and relevance; 4) derive data-driven recommendations from validated models and algorithms; 5) design PN studies around validated individual health or function needs and outcomes; 6) provide rigorous scientific evidence for an effect on health or function; 7) deliver user-friendly tools; 8) for healthy individuals, align with population-based recommendations; 9) communicate transparently about potential effects; and 10) protect individual data privacy and act responsibly. These principles are intended to establish a basis for responsible approaches to the evidence-based research and practice of PN and serve as an invitation for further public dialog. Several challenges were identified for PN to continue gaining acceptance, including defining the health–disease continuum, identification of biomarkers, changing regulatory landscapes, accessibility, and measuring success. Although PN approaches hold promise for public health in the future, further research is needed on the accuracy of dietary intake measurement, utilization and standardization of systems approaches, and application and communication of evidence.

[1]  B. Dawson-Hughes,et al.  Vitamin D measurement standardization: The way out of the chaos , 2017, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[2]  David T. Neal,et al.  Healthy through Habit: Interventions for Initiating & Maintaining Health Behavior Change , 2016, Behavioral Science & Policy.

[3]  A. Fischer,et al.  Willingness to pay for personalised nutrition across Europe. , 2016, European journal of public health.

[4]  E. Hafen,et al.  Health Data Cooperatives – Citizen Empowerment , 2014, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  M. Bochud,et al.  Precision nutrition: hype or hope for public health interventions to reduce obesity? , 2018, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Frank B. Hu,et al.  Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology , 2002, Current opinion in lipidology.

[7]  S. Wopereis,et al.  Phenotypic flexibility as a measure of health: the optimal nutritional stress response test , 2015, Genes & Nutrition.

[8]  Clare E. Collins,et al.  Assessment of Nutrient Intakes: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2016, Nutrients.

[9]  Hannelore Daniel,et al.  Phenotypic flexibility as key factor in the human nutrition and health relationship , 2014, Genes & Nutrition.

[10]  R. Bailey,et al.  A Review of Cutoffs for Nutritional Biomarkers. , 2016, Advances in nutrition.

[11]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives for improving diet and health through Medicare and Medicaid: A microsimulation study , 2019, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Joanne R. Lupton,et al.  Nutrition and Your Health Dietary Guidelines for Americans , 1980, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[13]  D. Benton Portion Size: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2015, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[14]  M. Ory,et al.  The science of sustaining health behavior change: the health maintenance consortium. , 2010, American journal of health behavior.

[15]  J. Foreyt,et al.  Impact of Behavior Therapy on Weight Loss , 1994, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[16]  J. Després,et al.  Precision Nutrition: A Review of Personalized Nutritional Approaches for the Prevention and Management of Metabolic Syndrome , 2017, Nutrients.

[17]  F. Hu,et al.  Foods, Nutrients, and Dietary Patterns: Interconnections and Implications for Dietary Guidelines. , 2016, Advances in nutrition.

[18]  Ben van Ommen,et al.  Systems biology of personalized nutrition , 2017, Nutrition reviews.

[19]  David Moher,et al.  CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  C. Lavie,et al.  The Failure to Measure Dietary Intake Engendered a Fictional Discourse on Diet-Disease Relations , 2018, Front. Nutr..

[21]  Elisa Cirillo,et al.  Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice , 2017, Genes & Nutrition.

[22]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Combining single patient (N-of-1) trials to estimate population treatment effects and to evaluate individual patient responses to treatment. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  Ben van Ommen,et al.  Next-Generation Biomarkers of Health. , 2016, Nestle Nutrition Institute workshop series.

[24]  Kenta Nakai,et al.  Stable feature selection based on the ensemble L1-norm support vector machine for biomarker discovery , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[25]  Raquel Hontecillas,et al.  Challenges in Personalized Nutrition and Health , 2018, Frontiers in Nutrition.

[26]  S A Bingham,et al.  Limitations of the various methods for collecting dietary intake data. , 1991, Annals of nutrition & metabolism.

[27]  J. Martínez,et al.  Can genetic-based advice help you lose weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. , 2017, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[28]  Corby K. Martin,et al.  Measuring food intake with digital photography. , 2014, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[29]  A. Grandjean Dietary intake data collection: challenges and limitations. , 2012, Nutrition reviews.

[30]  Jildau Bouwman,et al.  Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related behaviour change: evidence from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[31]  Jose M Ordovas,et al.  Personalised nutrition and health , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[32]  Jessica E Todd Changes in consumption of food away from home and intakes of energy and other nutrients among US working-age adults, 2005–2014 , 2017, Public Health Nutrition.

[33]  Jimmy D Bell,et al.  Plasma metabolome analysis identifies distinct human metabotypes in the postprandial state with different susceptibility to weight loss‐mediated metabolic improvements , 2018, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[34]  S. Kossida,et al.  Fusion methodologies for biomedical data. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.

[35]  Kathryn E. Bouskill,et al.  Socioeconomic inequalities in non-communicable diseases and their risk factors: an overview of systematic reviews , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[36]  R. Sorelle US Department of Health and Human Services gives states wider latitude in choosing services to be covered by Medicaid. , 2001, Circulation.

[37]  A. Alkerwi,et al.  Demographic and socioeconomic disparity in nutrition: application of a novel Correlated Component Regression approach , 2015, BMJ Open.

[38]  Nutrition Board Nutrigenomics and the Future of Nutrition: Proceedings of a Workshop , 2018 .

[39]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  How should we define health? , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Christopher H. Schmid,et al.  Single-patient (n-of-1) trials: a pragmatic clinical decision methodology for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[41]  S. Bijlsma,et al.  Ranges of phenotypic flexibility in healthy subjects , 2017, Genes & Nutrition.

[42]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women , 2017, The Lancet.

[43]  M. Rozga,et al.  Nutritional Genomics in Precision Nutrition: An Evidence Analysis Center Scoping Review. , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[44]  E. Segal,et al.  Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses , 2015, Cell.

[45]  P. Jones,et al.  Best practices for the design, laboratory analysis, and reporting of trials involving fatty acids , 2018, The American journal of clinical nutrition.