Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the undesirable outputs and large dimensionality of data sets with PCA

This paper proposes an effective approach to deal with undesirable outputs and simultaneously reduces the dimensionality of data set. First, we change the undesirable outputs to be desirable ones by reversing, then we do principal component analysis (PCA) on the ratios of a single desirable output to a single input. In order to reduce the dimensionality of data set, the required principal components have been selected from the generated ones according to the given choice principle. Then a linear monotone increasing data transformation is made to the chosen principal components to avoid being negative. Finally, the transformed principal components are treated as outputs into data envelopment analysis (DEA) models with a natural assurance region (AR). The proposed approach is then applied to real-world data set that characterizes the ecology performance of 17 Chinese cities in Anhui province.

[1]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Measuring airport quality from the airlines' viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Chapter 3 Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  I. M. Premachandra A note on DEA vs principal component analysis: An improvement to Joe Zhu's approach , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Ramalingam Shanmugam,et al.  At a crossroad of data envelopment and principal component analyses , 2007 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Rank order data in DEA: A general framework , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  C Serrano Cinca,et al.  Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA , 2004 .

[8]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Performance evaluation when non-discretionary factors correlate with technical efficiency , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[10]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  W. Cook,et al.  Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation , 1996 .

[13]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[14]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[17]  Zhu Qiao,et al.  Assessing Textile Factory Performance , 1993 .

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[19]  A. Hashimoto A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note , 1997 .

[20]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  DETERMINING AN EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF NEW INPUT AND OUTPUT USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[22]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Tomoe Entani,et al.  Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  John Ruggiero,et al.  On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector , 1996 .

[27]  Larry Jenkins,et al.  A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[29]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Separating Market Efficiency from Profitability and its Implications for Planning , 1995 .

[30]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  M. Tamiz,et al.  An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system , 2005 .

[32]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .