A Systematic Comparison of Syntactic Representations of Dependency Parsing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Joakim Nivre,et al. Graph Transformations in Data-Driven Dependency Parsing , 2006, ACL.
[2] Christopher D. Manning,et al. The Stanford Typed Dependencies Representation , 2008, CF+CDPE@COLING.
[3] Sigrid Klerke,et al. Down-stream effects of tree-to-dependency conversions , 2013, HLT-NAACL.
[4] Joakim Nivre,et al. Should Have, Would Have, Could Have. Investigating Verb Group Representations for Parsing with Universal Dependencies. , 2016, NAACL 2016.
[5] Dan Gusfield. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences - Computer Science and Computational Biology , 1997 .
[6] Roy Schwartz,et al. Learnability-Based Syntactic Annotation Design , 2012, COLING.
[7] Ondrej Dusek,et al. HamleDT: Harmonized multi-language dependency treebank , 2014, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.
[8] Joakim Nivre,et al. An Efficient Algorithm for Projective Dependency Parsing , 2003, IWPT.
[9] Guillaume Wisniewski,et al. PanParser: a Modular Implementation for Efficient Transition-Based Dependency Parsing , 2018, Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics.
[10] Joakim Nivre,et al. Characterizing the Errors of Data-Driven Dependency Parsing Models , 2007, EMNLP.
[11] Yuji Matsumoto,et al. Multilingual Back-and-Forth Conversion between Content and Function Head for Easy Dependency Parsing , 2017, EACL.
[12] Christopher D. Manning,et al. Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of English , 2015, DepLing.
[13] Joakim Nivre,et al. Transition-based Dependency Parsing with Rich Non-local Features , 2011, ACL.
[14] Veronika Laippala,et al. Universal Dependencies 1.4 , 2015 .
[15] Anders Søgaard,et al. On the Derivation Perplexity of Treebanks , 2010 .