Changing Patterns of Publication Productivity: Accumulative Advantage or Institutional Isomorphism?.

The study presented in this article investigated two competing perspectives - accumulative advantage and institutional isomorphism - on the relationship between publication productivity and institutional hierarchy. Accumulative advantage suggests that increased institutional differentiation should occur over time as highly ranked institutions extend their advantage, whereas institutional isomorphism suggests that social processes will cause institutions to become increasingly similar. Institutional data, derived from three national surveys of American college faculty, conducted between 1972 and 1992, were used. The results provide support for both perspectives, which is perhaps best explained by the open yet competitive nature of the American higher education system

[1]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[2]  B. Clark,et al.  The higher education system : academic organization in cross-national perspective , 1984 .

[3]  C. R. Pace.  The demise of diversity? : a comparative profile of eight types of institutions , 1974 .

[4]  B. Clark,et al.  The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds , 1988 .

[5]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[6]  A. Astin,et al.  Achieving educational excellence , 1985 .

[7]  D. Crane.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. , 1965, American sociological review.

[8]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. , 1990 .

[9]  James L. Morrison,et al.  Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education. , 1985 .

[10]  David Riesman,et al.  The Academic Revolution. , 1969 .

[11]  A. Bayer.  Teaching faculty in academe : 1972-73 , 1973 .

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[13]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[14]  J. S. Long,et al.  Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career , 1978 .

[15]  Alexander W. Astin,et al.  Are Reputational Ratings Needed to Measure Quality , 1981 .

[16]  Stephen D. Grunig,et al.  Research, Reputation, and Resources: The Effect of Research Activity on Perceptions of Undergraduate Education and Institutional Resource Acquisition. , 1997 .

[17]  Robert T. Blackburn,et al.  Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage , 1989 .

[18]  R. Levinson.  The Faculty and Institutional Isomorphism. , 1989 .

[19]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1985. , 1985 .

[20]  M. F. Fox.  Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review , 1983 .

[21]  Jack H. Schuster,et al.  American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled , 1986 .

[22]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[23]  Robert T. Blackburn,et al.  Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction , 1995 .

[24]  D. Webster.  America's Highest Ranked Graduate Schools, 1925–1982 , 1983 .

[25]  Robert T. Blackburn,et al.  Faculty research productivity 1972–1988: Development and application of constant units of measure , 1993 .