UV Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 across the UVC Spectrum: KrCl* Excimer, Mercury-Vapor, and Light-Emitting-Diode (LED) Sources

UV light is an effective tool to help stem the spread of respiratory viruses and protect public health in commercial, transportation, and health care settings. For effective use of UV, there is a need to determine the efficiency of different UV wavelengths in killing pathogens, specifically SARS-CoV-2, to support efforts to control the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic and future coronavirus-caused respiratory virus pandemics. ABSTRACT Effective disinfection technology to combat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can help reduce viral transmission during the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic and in the future. UV devices emitting UVC irradiation (200 to 280 nm) have proven to be effective for virus disinfection, but limited information is available for SARS-CoV-2 due to the safety requirements of testing, which is limited to biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories. In this study, inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 in thin-film buffered aqueous solution (pH 7.4) was determined across UVC irradiation wavelengths of 222 to 282 nm from krypton chloride (KrCl*) excimers, a low-pressure mercury-vapor lamp, and two UVC light-emitting diodes. Our results show that all tested UVC devices can effectively inactivate SARS-CoV-2, among which the KrCl* excimer had the best disinfection performance (i.e., highest inactivation rate). The inactivation rate constants of SARS-CoV-2 across wavelengths are similar to those for murine hepatitis virus (MHV) from our previous investigation, suggesting that MHV can serve as a reliable surrogate of SARS-CoV-2 with a lower BSL requirement (BSL2) during UV disinfection tests. This study provides fundamental information on UVC’s action on SARS-CoV-2 and guidance for achieving reliable disinfection performance with UVC devices. IMPORTANCE UV light is an effective tool to help stem the spread of respiratory viruses and protect public health in commercial, public, transportation, and health care settings. For effective use of UV, there is a need to determine the efficiency of different UV wavelengths in killing pathogens, specifically SARS-CoV-2, to support efforts to control the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic and future coronavirus-caused respiratory virus pandemics. We found that SARS-CoV-2 can be inactivated effectively using a broad range of UVC wavelengths, and 222 nm provided the best disinfection performance. Interestingly, 222-nm irradiation has been found to be safe for human exposure up to thresholds that are beyond those effective for inactivating viruses. Therefore, applying UV light from KrCl* excimers in public spaces can effectively help reduce viral aerosol or surface-based transmissions.

[1]  M. Tanito,et al.  Re‐Evaluation of Rat Corneal Damage by Short‐Wavelength UV Revealed Extremely Less Hazardous Property of Far‐UV‐C† , 2021, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[2]  G. Pareschi,et al.  UV-C irradiation is highly effective in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 replication , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[3]  C. Gerba,et al.  Inactivation of Coronaviruses and Phage Phi6 from Irradiation across UVC Wavelengths , 2021, Environmental science & technology letters.

[4]  Y. Liu,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 disinfection in aqueous solution by UV222 from a krypton chlorine excilamp , 2021, medRxiv.

[5]  S. Chellam,et al.  Removal and Inactivation of an Enveloped Virus Surrogate by Iron Conventional Coagulation and Electrocoagulation. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  N. Shigemoto,et al.  Effect of intermittent irradiation and fluence-response of 222 nm ultraviolet light on SARS-CoV-2 contamination , 2021, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy.

[7]  Timothy Ryan Julian,et al.  Community Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by Fomites: Risks and Risk Reduction Strategies , 2020, medRxiv.

[8]  Y. Gerchman,et al.  UV-LED disinfection of Coronavirus: Wavelength effect , 2020, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology.

[9]  A. Griffiths,et al.  Rapid and complete inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by ultraviolet-C irradiation , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[10]  N. Shigemoto,et al.  Effectiveness of 222-nm ultraviolet light on disinfecting SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination , 2020, American Journal of Infection Control.

[11]  O. Witzke,et al.  Susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to UV irradiation , 2020, American Journal of Infection Control.

[12]  Igor Shuryak,et al.  Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[13]  A. Boehm,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Persistence and Disinfection of Human Coronaviruses and Their Viral Surrogates in Water and Wastewater , 2020, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

[14]  E. I. Patterson,et al.  Methods of inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 for downstream biological assays , 2020, bioRxiv.

[15]  Dylan H. Morris,et al.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  K. Linden,et al.  Thinking Outside the Treatment Plant: UV for Water Distribution System Disinfection. , 2019, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  K. Linden,et al.  Synergy of MS2 disinfection by sequential exposure to tailored UV wavelengths. , 2018, Water research.

[18]  A. Nakane,et al.  Chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light induces neither DNA damage nor epidermal lesions in mouse skin, even at high doses , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  K. Linden,et al.  Wavelength-Dependent Damage to Adenoviral Proteins Across the Germicidal UV Spectrum. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  K. Bibby,et al.  Evaluation of Phi6 Persistence and Suitability as an Enveloped Virus Surrogate. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  F. Lowy,et al.  Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light , 2017, Radiation Research.

[22]  Karl G. Linden,et al.  Evaluating UV-C LED disinfection performance and investigating potential dual-wavelength synergy. , 2017, Water research.

[23]  M. Ramakrishnan Determination of 50% endpoint titer using a simple formula. , 2016, World journal of virology.

[24]  K. Linden,et al.  Comparison of UV-Induced Inactivation and RNA Damage in MS2 Phage across the Germicidal UV Spectrum , 2015, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  K. Linden,et al.  Action spectra for validation of pathogen disinfection in medium-pressure ultraviolet (UV) systems. , 2015, Water research.

[26]  K. Linden,et al.  Wavelength dependent UV inactivation and DNA damage of adenovirus as measured by cell culture infectivity and long range quantitative PCR. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  S. Zaffina,et al.  Accidental Exposure to UV Radiation Produced by Germicidal Lamp: Case Report and Risk Assessment , 2012, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[28]  Christopher M Walker,et al.  Effect of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on viral aerosols. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  C. Tseng,et al.  Inactivation of Viruses on Surfaces by Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[30]  Karl G. Linden,et al.  Standardization of Methods for Fluence (UV Dose) Determination in Bench-Scale UV Experiments , 2003 .

[31]  T. Tenkate Ultraviolet Radiation: Human Exposure and Health Risks. , 1998 .

[32]  Karl G. Linden,et al.  Estimating effective germicidal dose from medium pressure UV lamps , 1997 .

[33]  American Conference Of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1998 Ventilation A O , 2019 .

[34]  W. Kowalski,et al.  A Genomic Model for Predicting the Ultraviolet Susceptibility of Viruses , 2009 .

[35]  P. Payment,et al.  Methods and techniques in virology , 1993 .