Microfluidic system for high throughput characterisation of echogenic particles.

Echogenic particles, such as microbubbles and volatile liquid micro/nano droplets, have shown considerable potential in a variety of clinical diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The accurate prediction of their response to ultrasound excitation is however extremely challenging, and this has hindered the optimisation of techniques such as quantitative ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery. Existing characterisation techniques, such as ultra-high speed microscopy provide important insights, but suffer from a number of limitations; most significantly difficulty in obtaining large data sets suitable for statistical analysis and the need to physically constrain the particles, thereby altering their dynamics. Here a microfluidic system is presented that overcomes these challenges to enable the measurement of single echogenic particle response to ultrasound excitation. A co-axial flow focusing device is used to direct a continuous stream of unconstrained particles through the combined focal region of an ultrasound transducer and a laser. Both the optical and acoustic scatter from individual particles are then simultaneously recorded. Calibration of the device and example results for different types of echogenic particle are presented, demonstrating a high throughput of up to 20 particles per second and the ability to resolve changes in particle radius down to 0.1 μm with an uncertainty of less than 3%.

[1]  N. de Jong,et al.  20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Nico De Jong,et al.  Lipid shedding from single oscillating microbubbles. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  L. Masotti,et al.  Subharmonic emissions from microbubbles: effect of the driving pulse shape , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Johan G Bosch,et al.  Low-amplitude non-linear volume vibrations of single microbubbles measured with an "acoustical camera". , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Werner Lauterborn,et al.  Numerical investigation of nonlinear oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1976 .

[6]  E. Wisner,et al.  The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  J. Tu,et al.  Flow cytometry to characterize microbubbles , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[8]  M. Goldenberg,et al.  Micrometer-Scale Particle Sizing by Laser Diffraction: Critical Impact of the Imaginary Component of Refractive Index , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  Junjie Zhu,et al.  Particle focusing in microfluidic devices , 2010 .

[10]  刘金明,et al.  IL-13受体α2降低血吸虫病肉芽肿的炎症反应并延长宿主存活时间[英]/Mentink-Kane MM,Cheever AW,Thompson RW,et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[11]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Joseph V. Hajnal,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Sizing and Counting of Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[14]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability , 2011, Interface Focus.

[15]  William D. O'Brien,et al.  2005 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[16]  T. Matula,et al.  Using light scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B. Krauskopf,et al.  Proc of SPIE , 2003 .

[18]  Arthur C. Guyton,et al.  Comprar Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 12th Edition | John E. Hall | 9781416045748 | Saunders , 2010 .

[19]  N. de Jong,et al.  P2A-3 High Frequency Attenuation and Size Distribution Measurements of Definity and Manipulated Definity Populations , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[20]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging , 2007 .

[21]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[22]  Cleon E. Dean,et al.  Scattering Of Light By A Coated Bubble In Water Near The Critical And Brewster Scattering Angles , 1988, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[23]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) , 2007, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[24]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Microbubble oscillation in tubes with diameters of 12, 25, and 195 microns , 2006 .

[25]  Milton Kerker,et al.  The Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation ~Academic , 1969 .

[26]  J B Fowlkes,et al.  Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  Interface Focus , 2022 .

[28]  P M Shankar,et al.  Subharmonic backscattering from ultrasound contrast agents. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  E Stride,et al.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: A review , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[30]  M. Versluis,et al.  Acoustic sizing of an ultrasound contrast agent. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  Emilio Quaia,et al.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update , 2007, European Radiology.

[32]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Mapping microbubble viscosity using fluorescence lifetime imaging of molecular rotors , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Lawrence A. Crum,et al.  Sonoluminescence and bubble dynamics for a single, stable, cavitation bubble , 1992 .

[34]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[35]  Xiaomei Yan,et al.  Progress in the development of techniques based on light scattering for single nanoparticle detection , 2011 .

[36]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Optical observations of microbubble oscillation in small tubes , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[37]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[38]  Roberto Osellame,et al.  Straightforward 3D hydrodynamic focusing in femtosecond laser fabricated microfluidic channels. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[39]  Lisa R. Hilliard,et al.  Multi-wavelength microflow cytometer using groove-generated sheath flow. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[40]  Mark A Borden,et al.  Single-particle optical sizing of microbubbles. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[41]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[42]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior: a second-order nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  John E. Hall,et al.  Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology , 2015 .

[44]  B. Drinkwater,et al.  Patterning of microspheres and microbubbles in an acoustic tweezers , 2013, Biomedical microdevices.

[45]  R E Apfel,et al.  Mechanical characterization of microparticles by scattered ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[47]  Nico De Jong,et al.  Characterization of Definity™ ultrasound contrast agent at frequency range of 5-15 MHz. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[48]  Juan Tu,et al.  Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue microbubbles using light scattering. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Victoria E Froude,et al.  Dielectrophoresis of functionalized lipid unilamellar vesicles (liposomes) with contrasting surface constructs. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[50]  Martyn Hill,et al.  Ultrasound assisted particle and cell manipulation on-chip. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[51]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[52]  Sunghoon Kwon,et al.  Inertial focusing of non-spherical microparticles , 2011 .

[53]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Phase-change contrast agents for imaging and therapy. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[54]  M S Roos A technique for the study of acoustic scattering from microparticles. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Particle focusing in staged inertial microfluidic devices for flow cytometry. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[56]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Applications of Acoustics and Cavitation to Noninvasive Therapy and Drug Delivery , 2008 .