Comparing Safety-Related Riding Behaviors on Bicycles and Electric Bicycles

As electric bicycles (e-bikes) have emerged as a new transportation mode, their role in transportation systems and their impact on users have become important issues. The performance of e-bikes provides some benefits to users, compared to regular bicycles, such as a reduction in user effort required for similar trips, increased range, and increased speed to name a few. The performance characteristics of e-bikes could influence the behavior of riders and could influence on user safety. This work uses global positioning system (GPS) data collected during user trips on both e-bikes and regular bicycles, which are part of an on-campus e- bike sharing system, to study user safety behavior between bicycle and e-bike modes. This report focuses on behaviors observed under four situations: 1) riding behaviors on directional roadway segments, 2) riding behaviors on shared use paths, 3) stopping behavior at stop-controlled intersections, and 4) stopping behaviors at signalized intersections. Behavior is studied in each situation and analyzed with regard to the desired, or safest, behavior. Results show some differences in behaviors between users of the two bicycle types but indicate that bicycle type has a small influence on safety behavior as compared to facility characteristics and other factors.

[1]  Giancarlo Bacchieri,et al.  A community intervention to prevent traffic accidents among bicycle commuters. , 2010, Revista de saude publica.

[2]  Chong Zhang,et al.  Electric-bicycle-related injury: a rising traffic injury burden in China , 2010, Injury Prevention.

[3]  Jon D Fricker,et al.  Network Evaluation Tool to Improve Real and Perceived Bicycle Safety , 2007 .

[4]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles at signalized intersections. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  J Forester THE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION CONTROVERSY , 2001 .

[6]  Min He,et al.  Alternative Methods of Measuring Operating Speed of Electric and Traditional Bikes in China-Implications for Travel Demand Models , 2010 .

[7]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding , 2012 .

[8]  S. Boufous,et al.  Cycling Crashes in Children, Adolescents, and Adults—A Comparative Analysis , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  U Pulkkinen,et al.  An expert judgment model applied to estimating the safety effect of a bicycle facility. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  J P Schepers,et al.  Road factors and bicycle-motor vehicle crashes at unsignalized priority intersections. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Q. Shen,et al.  Bike-Sharing Systems in Beijing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou and Their Impact on Travel Behavior , 2011 .

[12]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Social-cognitive correlates of risky adolescent cycling behavior , 2010, BMC public health.

[13]  Giancarlo Bacchieri,et al.  Cycling to work in Brazil: users profile, risk behaviors, and traffic accident occurrence. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  H Summala,et al.  Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: an in-depth study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  W. Moritz Adult Bicyclists in the United States: Characteristics and Riding Experience in 1996 , 1998 .

[16]  Daniel Carter,et al.  Bicyclist Intersection Safety Index , 2007 .

[17]  P. DeMaio Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future , 2009 .

[18]  Alan Wachtel,et al.  Risk Factors for Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Collisions at Intersections * , 1994 .

[19]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[20]  L Aultman-Hall,et al.  Ottawa-Carleton commuter cyclist on- and off-road incident rates. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.