Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification, a New Shear Wave Velocity Imaging Method, for Breast Lesion Assessment by Ultrasound

Objectives. To evaluate virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) as a new elastography method concerning its intra- and interexaminer reliability and its ability to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions in comparison to and in combination with ultrasound (US) B-mode breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) assessment. Materials and Methods. US and VTIQ were performed by two examiners in 103 women with 104 lesions. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of VTIQ was assessed. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of BIRADS, VTIQ, and combined data were compared. Results. Fifty-four of 104 lesions were malignant. Intraexaminer reliability was consistent, and interexaminer agreement showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.93). The mean VTIQ values in malignant lesions were significantly higher than those in benign (7.73 m/s ± 1.02 versus 4.46 m/s ± 1.87; P < 0.0001). The combination of US-BIRADS with the optimal cut-off for clinical decision making of 5.18 m/s yielded a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 82%, PPV of 86%, and NPV of 98%. The combination of BIRADS and VTIQ led to improved test validity. Conclusion. VTIQ is highly reliable and reproducible. There is a significant difference regarding the mean maximum velocity of benign and malignant lesions. Adding VTIQ to BIRADS assessment improves the specificity.

[1]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  H. Frey.  [Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity]. , 2003, Der Radiologe.

[3]  Christian Weismann,et al.  Breast Sonography – 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography? , 2011, Breast Care.

[4]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Solid breast masses: classification with computer-aided analysis of continuous US images obtained with probe compression. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Sebastian Wojcinski,et al.  Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[8]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[9]  D. Noh,et al.  Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Abd-elrahma Hassan,et al.  Benign Versus Malignant Solid Breast Masses: US Differentiation , 2015 .

[12]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Effects of Precompression on Elasticity Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[13]  K. Parker,et al.  Sonoelasticity of organs: shear waves ring a bell , 1992, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[14]  R. Ohlinger,et al.  Ultrasound of the breast - value of sonographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of solid lesions. , 2004, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[15]  Jin Young Kwak,et al.  Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Shear Wave Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[17]  J W Sayre,et al.  Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. , 1999, Radiology.

[18]  C. Sewell,et al.  Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[19]  M. Vallespí,et al.  Role of Elastography in the Assessment of Breast Lesions , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  M. Fink,et al.  Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[21]  David O. Cosgrove,et al.  Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible , 2011, European Radiology.

[22]  Kim Thomson,et al.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[23]  Min Bai,et al.  Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[24]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[25]  W. Svensson,et al.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. , 2012, Radiology.

[26]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[27]  A. Thompson,et al.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  M. Mathieu,et al.  Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[29]  R. Barr,et al.  Sonographic Breast Elastography , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[30]  M. Golatta,et al.  Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ). , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[31]  S Hsueh,et al.  Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[32]  G. Gandini,et al.  Role of sonoelastography in characterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions , 2010, La radiologia medica.