Diversity in foresight: Insights from the fostering of innovation ideas

Foresight activities have often provided support for objectives such as priority-setting, networking and consensual vision-building. In this paper, we draw upon complementary evolutionary perspectives anddiscuss these objectives from the viewpoint of diversity which may be vital in contexts characterized by technological discontinuities and high uncertainties. We also argue that although the scanning of weak signals has been widely advocated in such contexts, the solicitationofideasforprospectiveinnovationsmayprovidemorefocused,action-oriented,andcomparablereflectionsof future developments. For the analysis of such ideas, we develop a collaborative foresight method RPM Screening which consists of phases for the generation, revision, multi-criteria evaluation, and portfolio analysis of innovation ideas. We also report experiences from a pilot project where this method was employed to enhance thework of the Foresight Forum of the Ministry of Trade and Industry in Finland. Encouraging results from this project and other recent applications suggest that RPM Screening can be helpful in foresight processes and the development of shared research agendas.

[1]  Johan Schot.  The Policy relevance of the Quasi-evolutionary Model. The Case of Stimulating Clean Technologies , 1992 .

[2]  Carl Henning Reschke,et al.  Evolutionary Theorising on Technological Change and Sustainable Development , 2003 .

[3]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Incentives in technology foresight , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Jari Kaivo-oja,et al.  Wild cards, weak signals and organisational improvisation , 2004 .

[5]  Ahti Salo,et al.  A group support system for foresight processes , 2004 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[7]  D. Stark,et al.  Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism , 1997 .

[8]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Decision making for technology executives : using multiple perspectives to improved performance , 1999 .

[9]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[10]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Foresight within ERA-NETs: Experiences from the preparation of an international research program , 2008 .

[11]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Forecasting with scenarios , 1993 .

[12]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition , 1999 .

[16]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[17]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Embedded foresight in RTD programs , 2002 .

[18]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)-elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[19]  Leena Ilmola,et al.  Filters in the Strategy Formulation Process , 2003, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[20]  John Price-Wilkin,et al.  Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[21]  Ian Miles,et al.  UK Foresight: three cycles on a highway , 2005 .

[22]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Prospective voluntary agreements for escaping techno-institutional lock-in , 2006 .

[23]  D. Kline,et al.  Positive feedback, lock-in, and environmental policy , 2001 .

[24]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[25]  R. Burchfield.  Oxford English dictionary , 1982 .

[26]  R. Nelson,et al.  Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance (Spanish Version) , 2001 .

[27]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Emergent foresight processes: industrial activities in wireless communications , 2004, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[28]  Thomas Reiss,et al.  Ex ante evaluation and technology assessment — two emerging elements of technology policy evaluation , 1992 .

[29]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Escaping carbon lock-in , 2002 .

[30]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[31]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[32]  吉田 仁美,et al.  Strength in Diversity , 2019, Bridging Communities through Socially Engaged Art.

[33]  David Pearce,et al.  Models of sustainable development , 1996 .

[34]  W. Arthur.  Positive feedbacks in the economy , 1990 .

[35]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Multicriteria Methods for Technology Foresight , 2003 .

[36]  D. E. Berlew.  Leadership and Organizational Excitement , 1974 .

[37]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[38]  Michael Keenan,et al.  Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: the UK experience , 2003 .

[39]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Responsiveness in foresight management: reflections from the Finnish food and drink industry , 2004 .

[40]  Keith Smith.  Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy , 2000 .

[41]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[42]  Harry Jones,et al.  Looking forward, a guide to futures research , 1984 .

[43]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[44]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Participatory development of a strategic product portfolio in a telecommunication company , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[45]  Denis Loveridge,et al.  Experts and foresight: review and experience , 2004 .

[46]  A. M. Mármol,et al.  The use of partial information on weights in multicriteria decision problems , 1998 .

[47]  A. D. Henriksen,et al.  A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool , 1999 .

[48]  R. Smits,et al.  The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy , 2004 .

[49]  Thomas Durand,et al.  Twelve lessons from ‘Key Technologies 2005’: the French technology foresight exercise , 2003 .

[50]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[51]  H. Ansoff,et al.  Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals , 1975 .

[52]  B. Martin,et al.  Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners , 1984 .

[53]  M. Meyer,et al.  Technological generalizations and leitbilder—the anticipation of technological opportunities , 2002 .

[54]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia and New Zealand , 1999 .

[55]  James P. Kahan,et al.  Experiences with National Technology Foresight Studies , 2001 .

[56]  Denis Loveridge.  Foresight - seven paradoxes , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[57]  J. Fagerberg.  Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature , 2003 .

[58]  K. Cuhls.  From forecasting to foresight processes—new participative foresight activities in Germany , 2003 .

[59]  H. Simon,et al.  Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science , 1966 .