Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making

Academy–industry collaborations (AICs) play a crucial role in the creation of new knowledge, by transferring this knowledge to the society and bringing into line theory and practice. Although in the state-of-the-art exists a number of efforts to analyze different factors that influence these collaborations, little attention has been paid in the application of dynamic capabilities (DCs) as an emerging tool to identify strategic elements in public research institutes (PRIs). Aiming to fill this literature gap, in this study, DCs methodology was applied to the Mexican PRI in order to classify the research activities into these strategies. A second stage was carried out to determine the influence of each DC in the global productivity and knowledge integration or transfer. The relationship between the variables was statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The main findings of this study showed that sensing and reconfiguration capabilities have a direct interaction on the global productivity and knowledge integration or transfer of the Mexican PRI, whereas the seizing capabilities present a weak impact on these items. The proper application of the DCs framework, as a substantial instrument for the PRI, opens up an alternative to identify that the main activities should receive special attention during the strategic planning process. These strategies can improve academy–industry collaborations by promoting the process of global knowledge and technology development.

[1]  R. Manzini,et al.  Partnering with public research centres and private technical and scientific service providers for innovation: the case of Italian rice company, Riso Scotti , 2013 .

[2]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[3]  Maria da Silva INTEGRATION BETWEEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT : A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES PERSPECTIVE , 2018 .

[4]  Frederick Kaefer,et al.  The development of dynamic capabilities through organisational and managerial processes , 2013 .

[5]  R. Scapens,et al.  Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems , 2012 .

[6]  Zaheer Khan,et al.  Business model innovation by international social purpose organizations: The role of dynamic capabilities , 2019 .

[7]  Mitsuru Kodama Collaborative Dynamic Capabilities: The Dynamic Capabilities View , 2018 .

[8]  Andy Neely,et al.  How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System , 2010 .

[9]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[10]  A. Liening,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[11]  P. Boardman,et al.  University researchers working with private companies , 2009 .

[12]  Shih-Yi Chien,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, learning, and store performance of restaurant: The role of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities , 2021 .

[13]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[14]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: Current Debates and Future Directions , 2009 .

[15]  V. J. Thomas,et al.  Endowing university spin-offs pre-formation: Entrepreneurial capabilities for scientist-entrepreneurs , 2020, Technovation.

[16]  Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez,et al.  Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis , 2018 .

[17]  Aki Koponen,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis , 2014 .

[18]  David Nettleton,et al.  Selection of Variables and Factor Derivation , 2014 .

[19]  Alejandro Barragán-Ocaña,et al.  Critical Factors toward Successful R & D Projects in Public Research Centers: a Primer , 2013 .

[20]  Damian Hine,et al.  Deconstructing and reconstructing the capability hierarchy , 2014 .

[21]  G. McLean,et al.  Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management , 2010 .

[22]  P. Ahmed,et al.  Dynamic capabilities: A review and research , 2007 .

[23]  Gloria Barczak,et al.  The changing bases of mutual trust formation in inter-organizational relationships: A dyadic study of university-industry research collaborations , 2017 .

[24]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments , 2014 .

[25]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[26]  Ozge Peksatici,et al.  The barriers against effective university industry collaboration - A study in Turkish aviation industry , 2019, Pressacademia.

[27]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer , 2018 .

[28]  Rong-hui Zhu,et al.  Identifying tacit university-industry collaborations in Chinese patents based on inventor-author analysis , 2020 .

[29]  S. Ankrah,et al.  Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review , 2015 .

[30]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[31]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The motivations, institutions and organization of university-industry collaborations in the Netherlands , 2017, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

[32]  Colin C. J. Cheng,et al.  Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation , 2016 .

[33]  Julia Nieves,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources , 2014 .

[34]  Ingo Liefner,et al.  A latecomer firm's R&D collaboration with advanced country universities and research institutes: The case of Huawei in Germany , 2019, Technovation.

[35]  Janne Harkonen,et al.  Evaluating university-industry collaboration: the European Foundation of Quality Management excellence model-based evaluation of university-industry collaboration , 2015 .

[36]  Isabel M. Prieto,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: An Integrative Role for Learning? , 2008 .

[37]  Jiatao Li,et al.  “Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[38]  Anna Chwiłkowska-Kubala What are the sources of regional airport economic effectiveness? The dynamic capabilities perspective with evidence from Poland , 2021 .

[39]  Elizabeth Price,et al.  The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management , 2014 .

[40]  G. Ioannou,et al.  Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance , 2011 .

[41]  J.H.R. van Duin,et al.  The reefer container market and academic research: A review study , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[42]  Rakesh B. Sambharya,et al.  Renewing Dynamic Capabilities Globally: An Empirical Study of the World’s Largest MNCs , 2014 .

[43]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Objectives , Agreements and Matching in Science-Industry Collaborations : Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle , 2003 .

[44]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures , 2000 .

[45]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Technological catch-up by east Asian firms: Trends, issues, and future research agenda , 2018 .

[46]  J. Navarro,et al.  A Model of Strategic Change: Universities and Dynamic Capabilities , 2003 .

[47]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[48]  Araceli Hidalgo-Peñate,et al.  Knowledge as a driver of dynamic capabilities and learning outcomes , 2019, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education.

[49]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[50]  Hongyi Sun,et al.  Critical success factors for new product development in the Hong Kong toy industry , 2005 .

[51]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[52]  Mariano Pereira,et al.  Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups , 2017 .

[53]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[54]  E. Moors,et al.  Reducing post-harvest food losses through innovative collaboration: Insights from the Colombian and Mexican avocado supply chains , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[55]  Denise Ambriz Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for Mexican students. , 2020, Social science research.

[56]  El sistema nacional de innovación mexicano: estructuras, políticas, desempeño y desafíos [The Mexican national innovation system: structures, policies, performance and challenges] , 2010 .

[57]  Marta Peris-Ortiz,et al.  Innovation and Teaching Technologies : New Directions in Research, Practice and Policy , 2014 .

[58]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation , 2017 .

[59]  Yang Li,et al.  A dynamic capabilities perspective on pro-market reforms and university technology transfer in a transition economy , 2021 .

[60]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge , 2010 .

[61]  Eduardo B. Pinto,et al.  Value of project management in university–industry R&D collaborations , 2020, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

[62]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[63]  Simon Burandt,et al.  Design and evaluation of learning processes in an international sustainability oriented study programme. In search of a new educational quality and assessment method , 2015 .

[64]  Simon P. Philbin Process model for university‐industry research collaboration , 2008 .

[65]  T. Tribaldos,et al.  Research funding programmes aiming for societal transformations: Ten key stages , 2019, Science and Public Policy.

[66]  Kristina Babelytė-Labanauskė,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance , 2017 .

[67]  Lars Schweizer,et al.  Clarifying the boundary conditions of value creation within dynamic capabilities framework: a grafting approach , 2020, Review of Managerial Science.

[68]  M. Salerno,et al.  INTEGRAÇÃO ENTRE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO: UMA PERSPECTIVA DE CAPACIDADES DINÂMICAS , 2018 .

[69]  F. Mavondo,et al.  The impact of business networks on dynamic capabilities and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic orientation , 2020, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[70]  Rachelle C. Sampson R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2007 .

[71]  Yu Cui,et al.  An empirical study on paths to develop dynamic capabilities: From the perspectives of entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning , 2010 .

[72]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[73]  G. Barczak,et al.  Trust Formation in University-Industry Collaborations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies, Shared Governance, and Champions* ,† , 2015 .

[74]  Xin He,et al.  A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism , 2021, Technovation.

[75]  N. Yip,et al.  Does affective evaluation matter for the success of university-industry collaborations? A sentiment analysis of university-industry collaborative project reports , 2020 .

[76]  N. Arranz,et al.  Joint R&D projects: Experiences in the context of European technology policy , 2006 .

[77]  Arnaud Gotlieb,et al.  Industry-Academia research collaboration in software engineering: The Certus model , 2020, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[78]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Supply-Side Innovation and Technology Commercialization , 2009 .

[79]  Eva Ostertagová,et al.  Methodology and Application of One-way ANOVA , 2013 .

[80]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[81]  Nicholas S. Vonortas,et al.  Market-, Firm-, and Project-Level Effects on the Innovation Impact of Collaborative R&D Projects , 2019 .

[82]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Academic-industrial relationships in the life sciences. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[83]  Ray B. Jones,et al.  Delivering digital health: The barriers and facilitators to university-industry collaboration , 2020, Health Policy and Technology.

[84]  Ozcan Saritas,et al.  The evolution of the use of Foresight methods: a scientometric analysis of global FTA research output , 2015, Scientometrics.

[85]  Valentina Morandi,et al.  The management of industry–university joint research projects: how do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? , 2013 .

[86]  David Tennenhouse,et al.  Intel's Open Collaborative Model of Industry-University Research , 2004 .

[87]  Miguel Ángel Pérez-Angón,et al.  The role of public policies in the decentralization process of Mexican science and the formation of new researchers in institutions outside the Mexico City area , 2017, Scientometrics.

[88]  B. Glaser The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[89]  T. Burgess,et al.  Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit , 2013 .

[90]  Sabina Scarpellini,et al.  R&D and eco-innovation: opportunities for closer collaboration between universities and companies through technology centers , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[91]  Mirko S. Winkler,et al.  Utilization of research knowledge in sustainable development pathways: Insights from a transdisciplinary research-for-development programme , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.

[92]  Mingzheng Wang,et al.  Correction to: Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: a dynamic capability view , 2020, Operations Management Research.

[93]  P. Andersen,et al.  The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships , 2015 .

[94]  Alan Gibbons,et al.  Collaborative R&D projects: a framework for effective management , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).

[95]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding , 2006, Scientometrics.

[96]  Shintaro Sengoku,et al.  Multilevel exploration of the realities of interdisciplinary research centers for the management of knowledge integration , 2017 .

[97]  Sue Newell,et al.  Dynamic In-capabilities , 2016 .

[98]  A. M. Subramanian,et al.  When do firms benefit from university–industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination , 2014 .

[99]  Jennifer Clark Coordinating a conscious geography: the role of research centers in multi-scalar innovation policy and economic development in the US and Canada , 2010 .

[100]  Angelos Ktenas Transfer, Diffusion and Development of Technology of Petrochemicals, Plastics and Elastomers in Greece: The factors of the succesfull transfer (Absorption, development, R&D) , 1995 .

[101]  Gudrun Jaegersberg,et al.  Communication and Collaboration Barriers , 2017 .

[102]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[103]  Jie Yang The knowledge management strategy and its effect on firm performance: A contingency analysis , 2010 .

[104]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[105]  Yelena V. Smirnova University–industry knowledge transfer in an emerging economy: Evidence from Kazakhstan , 2016 .

[106]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring preferences for impact versus publications among UK business and management academics , 2017 .

[107]  Jean-Philippe Vergne,et al.  The Path of Most Persistence: An Evolutionary Perspective on Path Dependence and Dynamic Capabilities , 2010 .

[108]  S. Ankrah,et al.  Social capital to facilitate ‘engineered’ university–industry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective , 2016 .

[109]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Standards, innovation, and latecomer economic development: Conceptual issues and policy challenges , 2014 .

[110]  C. Schultz,et al.  The influence of shared R&D-project innovativeness perceptions on university-industry collaboration performance , 2020, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[111]  D. O’Sullivan,et al.  Benefits management in university-industry collaboration programs , 2020 .