Textural fingerprints: A comprehensive descriptor for biofilm structure development

Automated tools to determine biofilm structure are necessary to interpret large time series of biofilm images. Image analysis based on the evaluation of Spatial Gray Level Dependence Matrices (SGLDM) enabled us to monitor biofilm structure development in response to external disturbances (i.e., periodic increases of wall shear stress) at a large scale (i.e., >1 mm). We applied our method to an experiment conducted in an annular reactor over a 10‐week period. Six states of biofilm development were differentiated by their unique structure. Previous exposure to rapidly increased shear influenced the resulting biofilm structure after additional shear increases. In addition, on the scale of the biofilm images, the biofilm structure after a shear increase was spatially heterogeneous and resulted in spatially differentiated regrowth after detachment at different locations in the biofilm. SGLDM was developed further as an alternative to approaches based on image binarization as binarization leads to information loss for low‐magnification and low‐resolution images. During post‐processing of image data, structural states of biofilm development were identified by K‐means clustering and data display in Principal Component plots. Quantitatively selected representative images were used to illustrate the meaning of the clusters. Post‐treatment of image data was essential for managing several thousands of raw biofilm images and therefore improved the usefulness of the image analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008;100: 889–901. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Peter Rodgers,et al.  Constructing Area-Proportional Venn and Euler Diagrams with Three Circles , 2005 .

[2]  T W Pope,et al.  Textural parameters based on the Spatial Gray Level Dependence Method applied to melanocytic nevi. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[3]  Abdulrahman Al-Janobi,et al.  Performance evaluation of cross-diagonal texture matrix method of texture analysis , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Analysis of a marine phototrophic biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy using the new image quantification software PHLIP , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[5]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Heterogeneity of biofilms in rotating annular reactors: Occurrence, structure, and consequences , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  B. Ersbøll,et al.  Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. , 2000, Microbiology.

[7]  M. Mazzotti,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Analysis of PSD Measurements through FBRM , 2000 .

[8]  Richard W. Conners,et al.  A Theoretical Comparison of Texture Algorithms , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  H. Lappin-Scott,et al.  The formation of migratory ripples in a mixed species bacterial biofilm growing in turbulent flow. , 1999, Environmental microbiology.

[10]  Richard W. Conners,et al.  Toward a Structural Textural Analyzer Based on Statistical Methods , 1981 .

[11]  Frank Ruskey,et al.  Drawing Area-Proportional Venn and Euler Diagrams , 2003, GD.

[12]  M. Pons,et al.  Optical method for long‐term and large‐scale monitoring of spatial biofilm development , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  M. Pons,et al.  Texture analysis of spatial biofilm development. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  Z Lewandowski,et al.  Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  R.M. Haralick,et al.  Statistical and structural approaches to texture , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Finding Structure in Co-Occurrence Matrices for Texture Analysis* , 1981 .

[17]  M. Pons,et al.  Modeling of chord length distributions , 2006 .

[18]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  Gary J. Harkin,et al.  Quantifying biofilm structure using image analysis. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[20]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Influence of detachment on substrate removal and microbial ecology in a heterotrophic/autotrophic biofilm. , 2007, Water research.

[22]  Haluk Beyenal,et al.  Quantifying Biofilm Structure: Facts and Fiction , 2004, Biofouling.

[23]  Zbigniew Lewandowski,et al.  Quantifying biofilm structure , 1999 .