Combining Sources of Preference Data for Modeling Complex Decision Processes

We review current state-of-the-art practices for combining preference data from multiple sources and discuss future research possibilities. A central theme is that any one data source (e.g., a scanner panel source) is often insufficient to support tests of complex theories of choice and decision making. Hence, analysts may need to embrace a wider variety of data types and measurement tools than traditionally have been considered in applied decision making and choice research. We discuss the viability of preference-stationarity assumptions usually made when pooling data, as well as random-utility theory-based approaches for combining data sources. We also discuss types of models and data sources likely to be required to make inferences about and estimate models that describe choice dynamics. The latter discussion is speculative insofar as the body of literature on this topic is small.

[1]  D. Hensher,et al.  Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models , 1993 .

[2]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Watching Customers Decide: Process Measures Add Insights to Choice Modeling Experiments , 1997 .

[3]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Buying/Selling Price Preference Reversals: Preference for Environmental Changes in Buying Versus Selling Modes , 1994 .

[4]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Market-Share Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Consumer Choice in Real and Computer-simulated Environments , 1992 .

[6]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[7]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[8]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Compensatory Choice Models of Noncompensatory Processes: The Effect of Varying Context , 1984 .

[9]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives , 1992 .

[10]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions , 1990 .

[11]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[12]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Combining revealed and stated preferences data , 1994 .

[13]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Estimating the Impact of Consumer Expectations of Coupons on Purchase Behavior: A Dynamic Structural Model , 1996 .

[14]  John Geweke,et al.  Bayesian inference for dynamic choice models without the need for dynamic programming , 1996 .

[15]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Unobserved Heterogeneity as an Alternative Explanation for 'Reversal' Effects in Behavioral Research , 2000 .

[16]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Distributed work and travel behaviour: The dynamics of interactive agency choices between employers and employees , 2000 .