Preservice Teachers’ TPACK: Using Technology to Support Inquiry Instruction

This investigation provides detailed descriptions of preservice secondary science teachers’ technology-enhanced inquiry instruction and their developing TPACK. Prior to student teaching, 27 preservice teachers were introduced to general guidelines for integrating technology to support reform-based science instruction. This instruction was in the context of a 2-year Master of Teaching program. Of the 27 preservice teachers, 26 used technology for inquiry instruction during student teaching. Our goals were to describe how these 26 preservice science teachers: (1) used educational technologies to support students’ investigations and (2) demonstrated their developing TPACK through technology-enhanced inquiry instruction. Multiple data sources (observations, lesson plans, interviews, and reflections) allowed for characterization of participants’ technology integration to support inquiry instruction and their decision-making related to the use of technology to support inquiry. Results indicated that participants incorporated technologies appropriate to the content and context to facilitate non-experimental and experimental inquiry experiences. Participants developing TPACK was evidenced by their selective and appropriate use of technology. Appropriate technology use for inquiry included the following: (1) to present an engaging introduction, (2) to facilitate data collection, (3) to facilitate data analysis, and (4) to facilitate communication and discussion of results. These results suggest that using digital images to facilitate whole-class inquiry holds considerable promise as a starting point for teachers new to inquiry instruction. Results of the present study may inform science teacher educators’ development of content-specific, technology-enhanced learning opportunities that: prepare preservice teachers for the responsibility of supporting inquiry instruction with technology, facilitate the transition to student-centered instruction, and support TPACK development.

[1]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Using Simulations in the Middle School: Does Assertiveness of Dyad Partners Influence Conceptual Change? , 2001 .

[2]  Carla C. Johnson.  Effective Professional Development and Change in Practice: Barriers Science Teachers Encounter and Implications for Reform , 2006 .

[3]  Lara K. Smetana,et al.  Simplifying Inquiry Instruction: Assessing the Inquiry Level of Classroom Activities , 2005 .

[4]  L. Schrum,et al.  Editorial: Research on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools: The Roles of Pedagogy and Content , 2007 .

[5]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Log on education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand , 2001, CACM.

[6]  Kuan-Chung Chen,et al.  From PCK to TPACK: Developing a Transformative Model for Pre-Service Science Teachers , 2010 .

[7]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences , 2003 .

[8]  Ronald D. Anderson.  Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry , 2002 .

[9]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[10]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[11]  Danielle E. Dani,et al.  Technology and Reform-Based Science Education , 2008 .

[12]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Situated Expertise in Integrating Use of Multimedia Simulation into Secondary Science Teaching , 2006 .

[13]  Jennifer L. Maeng,et al.  Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory , 2013 .

[14]  Dilek Ardac,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Chemistry Instruction in Enhancing the Learning of Content and Variable Control Under Guided Versus Unguided Conditions , 2002 .

[15]  G. Roehrig,et al.  Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge , 2009 .

[16]  Robert Tinker,et al.  Probeware and Handhelds in Elementary and Middle School Science , 2004 .

[17]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[18]  Jeffrey M. Kenton,et al.  Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening , 2005 .

[19]  Middle School Science: Working in a Confused Context. , 2000 .

[20]  Carla C. Johnson.  Whole-School Collaborative Sustained Professional Development and Science Teacher Change: Signs of Progress , 2007 .

[21]  Philip Bell,et al.  Inquiry and Technology , 2013 .

[22]  P. Shawn Irvin,et al.  Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains† , 2011 .

[23]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education , 1981 .

[24]  Karen E. Irving.  Preservice Science Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in Student Teaching , 2003 .

[25]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  R. Bell,et al.  The Use of a Computer Simulation to Promote Scientific Conceptions of Moon Phases , 2008 .

[27]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[29]  H. Borko,et al.  Measuring instructional practice in science using classroom artifacts: lessons learned from two validation studies , 2012 .

[30]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature , 2012 .

[31]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry‐based experiments in physics , 2003 .

[32]  N. Songer,et al.  Student Motivation and Internet Technology: Are Students Empowered to Learn Science? , 2000 .

[33]  J. H. Sandholtz.  Teaching With Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms , 1997 .

[34]  S. A. Özgün-Koca,et al.  Preservice Teachers' Emerging TPACK in a Technology-Rich Methods Class , 2010 .

[35]  B. White,et al.  Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling , 2005 .

[36]  Robert Tinker,et al.  Learning Science in Grades 3–8 Using Probeware and Computers: Findings from the TEEMSS II Project , 2008 .

[37]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Preservice Biology Teachers’ Use of Interactive Display Systems to Support Reforms-Based Science Instruction , 2009 .

[38]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools in Science Education: An Emerging Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Practice. , 2007 .

[39]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  The Interplay Between Different Forms of CAI and Students' Preferences of Learning Environment in the Secondary Science Class , 2005 .

[40]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[41]  Michele W. Spitulnik,et al.  Supporting Teachers’ Use of Technology in Science Instruction Through Professional Development: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[42]  P. Ammon,et al.  Learning to Teach Inquiry Science in a Technology-Based Environment: A Case Study , 2004 .

[43]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Lessons Learned: How Collaboration Helped Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[44]  Jeremy Dickerson,et al.  Digital Microscopes: Enhancing Collaboration and Engagement in Science Classrooms with Information Technologies , 2007 .

[45]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[46]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators , 2011 .

[47]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Internet Environments for Science Education , 2004 .

[48]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Preparing Tomorrow's Science Teachers to Use Technology: Guidelines for Science Educators , 2000 .

[49]  Margaret L. Niess,et al.  Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. , 2005 .

[50]  William Winn,et al.  Learning Oceanography from a Computer Simulation Compared with Direct Experience at Sea. , 2006 .

[51]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Internet Access: The Last Mile. , 2004 .

[52]  M. Linn,et al.  How do technology‐enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? , 2010 .

[53]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Targeted Support for Using Technology-Enhanced Science Inquiry Modules , 2008 .

[54]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the Wicked Problems of Teaching with Technology , 2007 .

[55]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[56]  Cathleen Norris,et al.  Examining 25 years of technology in U.S. education , 2002, CACM.

[57]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.