Automatic drought stress detection in grapevines without using conventional threshold values

[1]  Annelies Baert,et al.  Functional unfold principal component analysis for automatic plant-based stress detection in grapevine. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[2]  E. Fereres,et al.  Sensitivity of Trunk Diameter Fluctuations in Vitis vinifera L. Tempranillo and Cabernet Sauvignon Cultivars , 2012, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[3]  Wenceslao Conejero,et al.  Using trunk diameter sensors for regulated deficit irrigation scheduling in early maturing peach trees , 2011 .

[4]  A. Naor,et al.  Irrigation Scheduling and Evaluation of Tree Water Status in Deciduous Orchards , 2010 .

[5]  K. Steppe,et al.  Linking stem diameter variations to sap flow, turgor and water potential in tomato , 2010 .

[6]  Mª Victoria Cuevas Sánchez,et al.  Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: A review , 2010 .

[7]  Kris Villez,et al.  Use of Unfold PCA for on-line plant stress monitoring and sensor failure detection , 2009 .

[8]  Kathy Steppe,et al.  Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit , 2009 .

[9]  Kathy Steppe,et al.  A step towards new irrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling , 2008, Irrigation Science.

[10]  J. E. Fernández,et al.  The use of sap flow measurements for scheduling irrigation in olive, apple and Asian pear trees and in grapevines , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[11]  D. Intrigliolo,et al.  Scheduling deficit irrigation of citrus trees with maximum daily trunk shrinkage , 2007 .

[12]  D. Intrigliolo,et al.  Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[13]  H. Jones Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[14]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  F. Moreno,et al.  Maximum daily trunk shrinkage reference values for irrigation scheduling in olive trees , 2006 .

[16]  D. Intrigliolo,et al.  Usefulness of diurnal trunk shrinkage as a water stress indicator in plum trees. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[17]  Kathy Steppe,et al.  A mathematical model linking tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter fluctuations and radial stem growth. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[18]  J. Flexas,et al.  Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? , 2005 .

[19]  A. Chouzouri,et al.  Optimization of irrigation water use in grapevines using the relationship between transpiration and plant water status , 2005 .

[20]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components: Jackson/User's Guide to Principal Components , 2004 .

[21]  H. Jones Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[22]  R. Lemeur,et al.  An experimental system for analysis of the dynamic sap-flow characteristics in young trees: results of a beech tree. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[23]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part III: Process history based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[24]  E. Fereres,et al.  Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees , 2003 .

[25]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Process analysis and abnormal situation detection: from theory to practice , 2002 .

[26]  Stephen P. Gurden,et al.  A comparison of multiway regression and scaling methods , 2001 .

[27]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements , 2001, Irrigation Science.

[28]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Derivation of function space analysis based PCA control charts for batch process monitoring , 2001 .

[29]  James O. Ramsay,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2005 .

[30]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis , 1994 .

[31]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Statistical Process Control of Multivariate Processes , 1994 .

[32]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[33]  S. Wold,et al.  Multi‐way principal components‐and PLS‐analysis , 1987 .

[34]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[35]  H. M. Taylor,et al.  Water Relations and Growth of Cotton in Drying Soil1 , 1973 .

[36]  K. Steppe,et al.  Could rapid diameter changes be facilitated by a variable hydraulic conductance? , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[37]  Joan Bonany,et al.  Could trunk diameter sensors be used in woody crops for irrigation scheduling? A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. , 2010 .

[38]  Markus Keller,et al.  Managing grapevines to optimise fruit development in a challenging environment: a climate change primer for viticulturists , 2010 .

[39]  A. Torrecillas,et al.  Assessment of maximum daily trunk shrinkage signal intensity threshold values for deficit irrigation in lemon trees , 2009 .

[40]  P. Cruiziat Comprendre la montée de la sève dans les arbres , 2007 .

[41]  Judy Eastham,et al.  Use of Sap-Flow Sensors to Schedule Vineyard Irrigation. II. Effects of Post-Veraison Water Deficits on Composition of Shiraz Grapes , 1998, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[42]  H. Hotelling Multivariate Quality Control-illustrated by the air testing of sample bombsights , 1947 .

[43]  Columbia Uni.,et al.  Selected Techniques Of Statistical Analysis , 1947 .