The influence of national level factors on international kaizen transfer: An exploratory study in The Netherlands

Purpose: The purpose of this research study was to examine the international transfer of kaizen or continuous improvement. The central research question was formulated as: what national level factors influence the transfer of kaizen, and how? Design/methodology/approach: In the study, a survey interview was followed with semi-structured interviews. The study focused on Japanese subsidiaries in The Netherlands. A total of 15 companies participated in the research. Findings: Two main national level factors, not previously identified in the literature, were found: the level of eagerness of employees and the level of discipline of employees. It was also found that, based on these two factors, transferring kaizen to The Netherlands is very challenging. Research limitations/implications: The research was limited to kaizen transfer from Japan to The Netherlands. Practical implications: Companies benefit from this research because it contributes to understanding the relative ease of transferring kaizen. Having this understanding aids companies with planning the transfer of kaizen and its implementation. Originality/value: Several studies have examined the international transfer of kaizen and/or the international transfer of Japanese management systems. Some studies have identified national level factors as being important but understanding of how and why the factors play a role has been underdeveloped. Furthermore, companies are still struggling with the international transfer of kaizen. This study on kaizen transfer found two previously unidentified key factors, the reasons for their occurrence, and how they influence the transfer. This allows an improved understanding.

[1]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  Finding kaizen approach in small Mexican family businesses: an exploratory study , 2011 .

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[3]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Culture and social behaviour , 2004 .

[4]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[5]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  Implementation of Lean‐Kaizen in the human resource service process , 2010 .

[6]  J. Bessant.  High-Involvement Innovation: Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Continuous Change , 2003 .

[7]  Bruce A. Henderson,et al.  Lean Transformation: How to Change Your Business into a Lean Enterprise , 1999 .

[8]  Dipak Basu,et al.  Strategic human resource management of Japanese multinationals – A case study of Japanese multinational companies in the UK , 1999 .

[9]  P. Adler.  Building better bureaucracies , 1999 .

[10]  T. Diana L. van Aduard de Macedo-Soares,et al.  Key quality management practices of leading firms in Brazil: findings of a pilot‐study , 1996 .

[11]  Schon Beechler,et al.  The Transfer of Japanese-Style Management to American Subsidiaries: Constraints, and Competencies , 1994 .

[12]  Steve New,et al.  Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study , 2003 .

[13]  Barry Elsey,et al.  "Kaizen" and Technology Transfer Instructors as Work-based Learning Facilitators in Overseas Transplants: A Case Study. , 2000 .

[14]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[15]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  The impact of national cultures on structured knowledge transfer , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  Anette Brannemo,et al.  How does the industry work with sourcing decisions? Case study at two Swedish companies , 2006 .

[17]  K. John Fukuda,et al.  Japanese-Style Management Transferred: The Experience of East Asia , 1988, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[18]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  Stefan Lagrosen,et al.  Quality management in Europe: a cultural perspective , 2002 .

[20]  Anna B. Kayes,et al.  Essential competencies for cross‐cultural knowledge absorption , 2005 .

[21]  N. Nayab.  Kaizen: The key to Japan‚s competitive success , 2009 .

[22]  Sameer Prasad,et al.  Cultural and structural constraints on total quality management implementation , 1998 .

[23]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[24]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations , 2009 .

[25]  Celeste P.M. Wilderom,et al.  Kaizen and culture: on the transferability of Japanese suggestion systems , 1998 .

[26]  Anders Berger,et al.  Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs , 1997 .

[27]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  A hybrid risk management model : a case study of the textile industry , 2012 .

[28]  J. Bessant,et al.  High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement , 1997 .

[29]  Yulong Li,et al.  ERP adoption in Chinese small enterprise: an exploratory case study , 2011 .

[30]  Taina Savolainen,et al.  Cycles of continuous improvement , 1999 .

[31]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Improving Survey Questions , 1997 .

[32]  A. Subash Babu,et al.  Towards TQM using kaizen process dynamics: a case study , 1995 .

[33]  Alessandra Vecchi,et al.  Quality Management: A cross-cultural perspective based on the GLOBE framework , 2011 .

[34]  Harry Boer,et al.  CI changes: from suggestion box to organisational learning , 2000 .

[35]  J. Bessant.  John Bessant: Managing Advanced Manufacturing Technology. The Challenge of the Fifth Wave , 1991 .

[36]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  Applying Gemba‐Kaizen in a multinational food company: a process innovation framework , 2012 .

[37]  Raymond N. Cheser,et al.  THE EFFECT OF JAPANESE KAIZEN ON EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN U.S. MANUFACTURING , 1998 .

[38]  Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park,et al.  Lean-kaizen public service: an empirical approach in Spanish local governments , 2009 .

[39]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Improving Survey Questions , 1997 .

[40]  Rodney Peter Gapp,et al.  Business improvement strategy or useful tool? Analysis of the application of the 5S concept in Japan, the UK and the US , 2008 .

[41]  John Bessant,et al.  Enabling continuous improvement: a case study of implementation , 2004 .

[42]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[43]  Dmitrij Slepniov,et al.  Offshore Outsourcing of Production: An Exploratory Study of Process and Effects in Danish Companies , 2008 .

[44]  Andres Sousa-Poza,et al.  A cross‐cultural study of the differing effects of corporate culture on TQM in three countries , 2001 .

[45]  H. Triandis.  Culture and Social Behavior , 2019, Cross-Cultural Explorations.

[46]  A. Pettigrew.  Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[47]  Terrence J Thomas,et al.  Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition , 1985 .

[48]  Stefan Lagrosen,et al.  Exploring the impact of culture on quality management , 2003 .

[49]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  The Japanization of British Industry: New Developments in the 1990s , 1993 .

[50]  R. McAdam,et al.  A multilevel case study critique of six sigma: statistical control or strategic change? , 2004 .

[51]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  An exploratory study of 5S: a multiple case study of multinational organizations in Mexico , 2012 .

[52]  John Bessant,et al.  An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour , 2001 .

[53]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[54]  T Kono,et al.  Japanese management philosophy: can it be exported? , 1982, Long range planning.

[55]  M. Flaherty,et al.  Global Operations Management , 1996 .

[56]  J. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Way in Services: The Case of Lean Product Development , 2006 .

[57]  John A. Courtright,et al.  Interaction Patterns in Organic and Mechanistic System , 1989 .

[58]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Quality management practices: a comparative study between East and West , 1998 .

[59]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[60]  Katsuki Aoki,et al.  Transferring Japanese kaizen activities to overseas plants in China , 2008 .

[61]  Yanqing Duan,et al.  Identifying key factors affecting transnational knowledge transfer , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[62]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[63]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  America's most successful export to Japan: Continuous improvement programs , 1991 .

[64]  F. J. Fowler,et al.  Standardized Survey Interviewing , 1990 .

[65]  John Bessant,et al.  Rediscovering continuous improvement , 1994 .

[66]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Transferring Organizational Learning Systems to Japanese Subsidiaries in China , 2006 .

[67]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: Three different perspectives and guiding principles , 2011 .

[68]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[69]  Kevin W. Linderman,et al.  The Role of Culture as Driver of Quality Management and Performance: Infrastructure Versus Core Quality Practices , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[70]  Richard Florida,et al.  THE TRANSFER OF JAPANESE MANAGEMENT STYLES IN TWO US TRANSPLANT INDUSTRIES: AUTOS AND ELECTRONICS , 1995 .

[71]  R. Florida,et al.  Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System and Its Transfer to the U.S. , 1993 .

[72]  D. Samson,et al.  The cultural characteristic of individualism/collectivism: A comparative study of implications for investment in operations between emerging Asian and industrialized Western countries , 2010 .

[73]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[74]  J. Liker.  The Toyota Way , 2003 .

[75]  Zulema Lopes Pereira,et al.  European quality management practices: The impact of national culture , 2001 .

[76]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Determinants of R&D—marketing integration in high-tech Japanese firms , 1993 .

[77]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[78]  Giana M. Eckhardt.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organisations Across Nations , 2002 .

[79]  L. Welch,et al.  The importance of language in international knowledge transfer , 2008 .

[80]  Yoshio Kondo.  Key points in quality control training courses for managers , 1990 .

[81]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context: A study of national culture , 2006 .

[82]  Hem C. Jain,et al.  Japanese management in Singapore: Convergence of human resource management practices , 1987 .