A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.

[1]  D. Metz,et al.  Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. , 2008, European heart journal.

[2]  H. Lange,et al.  Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  E. Fretz,et al.  Vascular communications of the hand in patients being considered for transradial coronary angiography: is the Allen's test accurate? , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  U. Limbruno,et al.  Clinical and Procedural Predictors of Nurse Workload During and After Invasive Coronary Procedures: The Potential Benefit of a Systematic Radial Access , 2005, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  B. Strauss,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction--the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. , 2005, American heart journal.

[6]  P. Due-Tønnessen,et al.  Cerebral emboli during left heart catheterization may cause acute brain injury. , 2005, European heart journal.

[7]  P. Garot,et al.  Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Morice,et al.  Comparison of 5 French versus 6 French guiding catheters for transradial coronary intervention: a prospective, randomized study. , 2004, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[10]  Serge Simard,et al.  Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. , 2004, American heart journal.

[11]  A. Dibié,et al.  Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  L. Hands,et al.  Duplex ultrasonography predicts safety of radial artery harvest in the presence of an abnormal Allen test. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  G. Watanabe,et al.  Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  B. Yoo,et al.  Procedural outcomes of repeated transradial coronary procedure , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  R. Sabatier,et al.  Mini‐invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: Direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and transradial approach , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[16]  W. Daniel,et al.  Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: A dual‐center registry , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[17]  David O. Williams,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Revision of the 1993 PTCA Guidelines)—Executive Summary , 2001 .

[18]  W. Cantor,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of abciximab after failed thrombolytic therapy. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  M. Morice,et al.  Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  D. Cohen,et al.  Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. , 1999, American heart journal.

[21]  S. Saito,et al.  Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  J. Schneider,et al.  Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[24]  D. Antoniucci,et al.  A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  永井俊一.  Ultrasonic Assessment of Vascular Complications in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty after Transradial Approach(経橈骨動脈法による冠動脈造影と冠動脈形成術後の血管合併症の超音波診断) , 1998 .

[26]  M. Morice,et al.  Radial approach: what about the learning curve? , 1997, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[27]  L. Missault,et al.  Brachial, radial, or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: a randomized comparison. , 1997, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[28]  G. Laarman,et al.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  P. Stella,et al.  Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. , 1997, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[30]  P. Vranckx,et al.  Frequency of a positive modified Allen's test in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. , 1996, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[31]  Mick Mj.  Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography. , 1996 .

[32]  Mick.  Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography. , 1996, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[33]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Predictors of groin complications after balloon and new-device coronary intervention. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  T. Ryan.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  J M Harris,et al.  Coronary angiography and its complications. The search for risk factors. , 1984, Archives of internal medicine.