Unwinding processes in Computer Science student projects

This thesis investigates computer science student projects and some of the processes involved in the running of such projects. The reason for this investigation is that there are some interesting c ...

[1]  K. Provan.  Recognizing, Measuring, and Interpreting The Potential/Enacted Power Distinction In Organizational Research , 1980 .

[2]  Gillian Dobbie,et al.  Software engineers aren't born in teams: supporting team processes in software engineering project courses , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice (Cat. No.98EX220).

[3]  P. Mayring.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2000 .

[4]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[5]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Students' Conceptions Of Their Engineering Discipline: A Word Association Study , 2000 .

[6]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[7]  M. Loui.  Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students , 2005 .

[8]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[9]  Mattias Wiggberg,et al.  I think it's better if those who know the area decide about it: a pilot study concerning power in CS student project groups , 2006, Baltic Sea '06.

[10]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[11]  Susan M. Lord,et al.  Enabling effective engineering teams: a program for teaching interaction skills , 1998 .

[12]  Anders Berglund,et al.  On the understanding of computer network protocols , 2002 .

[13]  Robert Leeper.  Progressive project assignments in computer courses , 1989, SIGCSE '89.

[14]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Conceptions of the Engineering Design Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals , 2005 .

[15]  Andreas Jacobsson,et al.  What is the word for "Engineering" in Swedish : Swedish students' conceptions of their discipline , 2007 .

[16]  Gillian Dobbie,et al.  Supporting and evaluating team dynamics in group projects , 1999, SIGCSE '99.

[17]  J. Kahn.  Culture: Demise or Resurrection? , 1989 .

[18]  Anna Eckerdal,et al.  Novice students' learning of object-oriented programming , 2006 .

[19]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[20]  Tony Clear.  Research paradigms and the nature of meaning and truth , 2001, SGCS.

[21]  Paul Connerton.  Critical sociology : selected readings , 1976 .

[22]  Ozgur Eris,et al.  Development Of The Persistence In Engineering (Pie) Survey Instrument , 2005 .

[23]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools , 1998 .

[24]  Judith Segal,et al.  When Software Engineers Met Research Scientists: A Case Study , 2005, Empirical Software Engineering.

[25]  Kevin P. Grant,et al.  The perceived importance of technical competence to project managers in the defense acquisition community , 1997 .

[26]  E. Seat,et al.  Enabling effective engineering teams: a program for teaching interaction skills , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[27]  Lars Asplund,et al.  Multi-level project work; a study in collaboration , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[28]  Jingwei Zhang,et al.  Numerical Methods for the Chemical Master Equation , 2009 .

[29]  Sally Fincher,et al.  Using Theory to Inform Capacity‐Building: Bootstrapping Communities of Practice in Computer Science Education Research , 2006 .

[30]  Lauri Malmi,et al.  Do Students Work Efficiently in a Group? -Problem-Based Learning Groups in Basic Programming Course. , 2004 .

[31]  Chris Cope,et al.  Educationally Critical Aspects of the Concept of an Information System , 2002, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[32]  Dorothy Holland,et al.  Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming , 1995 .

[33]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Open Ended Group Projects (OEGP) : A way of including diversity in the IT curriculum , 2006 .

[34]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[35]  Arnold Pears,et al.  Enriching online learning resources with "explanograms" , 2003 .

[36]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  Making Visible the Behaviors that Influence Learning Environment: A Qualitative Exploration of Computer Science Classrooms , 2004, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[37]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[38]  J. Shanteue.  COMPETENCE IN EXPERTS: THE ROLE OF TASK CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[39]  K. Götz,et al.  Subjektive Theorien zu Lernformen in der betrieblichen DV-Qualifizierung , 1995 .

[40]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  When do group projects widen the student experience gap? , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[41]  Tero Vartiainen,et al.  Moral conflicts perceived by students of a project course , 2006, Baltic Sea '06.

[42]  Yifat Ben-David Kolikant,et al.  Students' alternative standards for correctness , 2005, ICER '05.

[43]  F. Marton,et al.  Two faces of variation , 1999 .

[44]  P. Ricoeur,et al.  Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation , 2016 .

[45]  K. D. Benne,et al.  Functional Roles of Group Members , 2010 .

[46]  Thabotharan Kathiravelu,et al.  Towards content distribution in opportunistic networks , 2007 .

[47]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Open Ended Group Projects a 'Tool' for More Effective Teaching , 2003, ACE.

[48]  Amer Diwan,et al.  Student culture vs group work in computer science , 2004 .

[49]  Mattias Wiggberg,et al.  Bridges and Problem Solving - Swedish Engineering Students Conceptions of Engineering in 2007 , 2009, CSEDU.

[50]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[51]  L. Barker,et al.  Groups in Process: An Introduction to Small Group Communication , 1979 .

[52]  B Downe-Wamboldt,et al.  Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. , 1992, Health care for women international.

[53]  S. Deetz.  Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy , 1996 .

[54]  Henrik Johansson,et al.  Performance characterization and evaluation of parallel PDE solvers , 2006 .

[55]  Amer Diwan,et al.  Student culture vs group work in computer science , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[56]  David Coppit,et al.  Large team projects in software engineering courses , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[57]  Mary Z. Last.  Investigating the group development process in virtual student software project teams , 2003 .

[58]  Paul W. Richardson.  The culture of education , 1996 .

[59]  Martha Lucia Hause.  Software development performance in remote student teams in international computer science collaboration , 2003 .

[60]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[61]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[62]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[63]  R. Sokołowski.  Ideas Pertaining to A Pure Phenomenology and to A Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book , 1984 .

[64]  Mattias Wiggberg,et al.  Computer science students' experiences of decision making in project groups , 2007 .

[65]  R. Säljö.  Lärande i praktiken : ett sociokulturellt perspektiv , 2005 .

[66]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Educating computer scientists: linking the social and the technical , 1994, CACM.

[67]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[68]  Anders Berglund,et al.  On context in phenomenographic research on understanding heat and temperate , 2001 .

[69]  Magnus Olsson,et al.  A climbing robot for autonomous inspection of live power lines , 2006 .

[70]  Agnes Rensfelt,et al.  Nonparametric identification of viscoelastic materials , 2006 .

[71]  Vicki L. Almstrum,et al.  Interaction factors in software development performance in distributed student teams in computer science , 2001 .

[72]  Nalin Sharda,et al.  What Do Engineers Want?: Examining Engineering Education through Bloom's Taxonomy , 2004 .

[73]  Edmund Husserl.  Logical Investigations Volume 2 , 1970 .

[74]  Manivasakan Sabesan,et al.  Querying Mediated Web Services , 2007 .

[75]  D. Hantula.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2001 .

[76]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[77]  Anders Berglund,et al.  Students learn CS in different ways: insights from an empirical study , 2006, ITICSE '06.

[78]  Eddie Wadbro,et al.  Topology optimization for acoustic wave propagation problems , 2006 .

[79]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[80]  R. Dahl.  The concept of power , 2007 .

[81]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  STRATEGIES OF LEARNING AND STUDYING: RECENT RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1977 .

[82]  Jonas Boustedt.  Students working with a large software system : experiences and understandings , 2007 .