The use of the ARP© system to reduce the costs of soil survey for precision viticulture

Abstract The goal of this research was to develop a procedure to minimize the cost of soil survey optimizing ARP© (Automatic Resistivity Profiling) deployment and selecting the best placement of the sampling sites to employ for soil profile description and analysis. In this respect, devoted tests were conducted in a 3.5 ha vineyard located in Tuscany (central Italy). ARP© produced close-spaced measurements (2335 points) of geo-referenced values of apparent electrical resistivity (ERa) related approximately to 0.5 m depth. A fast soil surface sampling (0.1–0.3 m depth) was contemporarily carried out for analyzing moisture, particle size distribution and electrical conductivity. Relationships between soil properties, elevation and ERa data were analyzed along with a comparative investigation about the cost for soil description, analysis and ARP survey. The best correlated soil property (clay) to ERa was then employed for evaluating its predictability starting from different combinations of reduced ARP measurements and sampling sites chosen by regression-driven method and the ESAP (ECe Sampling, Assessment and Prediction) software. It was noticed that the reduction of the soil sample number affects clay map predictability less than the decrease of ARP survey intensity. The regression approach provided higher clay predictability than ESAP for the densest ARP survey and loosest soil sampling. Such a procedure can be applied to fields once the geoelectrical calibration phase is performed. Given that the study case can be considered representative of many Mediterranean viticulture districts, we are confident that the methodology can be widely used. These findings indicate that ARP on-the-go sensor can fruitfully support traditional soil investigation, allowing the cost reduction for sampling and laboratory analyses.

[1]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[2]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[3]  M. Dabas Theory and practice of the new fast electrical imaging system ARP , 2008 .

[4]  E. Amezketa,et al.  Soil classification and salinity mapping for determining restoration potential of cropped riparian areas , 2008 .

[5]  Rgv Bramley,et al.  Making sense of vineyard variability in Australia , 2003 .

[6]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[7]  Kent M. Eskridge,et al.  Field-scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition , 2001 .

[8]  Z. L. Frogbrook,et al.  Identifying management zones in agricultural fields using spatially constrained classification of soil and ancillary data , 2007 .

[9]  B. Nicoullaud,et al.  Exploring the Spatial Relationships Between Some Soil Properties and Wheat Yields in Two Soil Types , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[10]  H. J. Farahani,et al.  Map Quality and Zone Delineation as affected by Width of Parallel Swaths of Mobile Agricultural Sensors , 2007 .

[11]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2004 .

[12]  R. Bramley,et al.  Vineyard variability in Marlborough, New Zealand: characterising variation in vineyard performance and options for the implementation of Precision Viticulture , 2011 .

[13]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  On the spatial scaling of soil moisture , 1999 .

[14]  Francesco Morari,et al.  Application of multivariate geostatistics in delineating management zones within a gravelly vineyard using geo-electrical sensors , 2009 .

[15]  Alessio Pollice,et al.  Using an Automatic Resistivity Profiler Soil Sensor On-The-Go in Precision Viticulture , 2013, Sensors.

[16]  David K. Oline,et al.  Scaling patterns of biomass and soil properties: an empirical analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Mapping suitability for Sangiovese wine by means of δ13C and geophysical sensors in soils with moderate salinity , 2010 .

[18]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial and temporal variation of soil physical properties in tillage systems using electrical resistivity tomography. , 2010 .

[19]  David D. Bosch,et al.  Effects of Sampling Interval on Spatial Patterns and Statistics of Watershed Nitrogen Concentration , 2009 .

[20]  M. Dabas,et al.  Experimental Resistivity Survey at Wroxeter Archaeological Site with a Fast and Light Recording Device , 2000 .

[21]  R. G. V. Bramley,et al.  Variation in vine vigour, grape yield and vineyard soils and topography as indicators of variation in the chemical composition of grapes, wine and wine sensory attributes , 2011 .

[22]  F. D. Whisler,et al.  Spatial Variability Analysis of Soil Physical Properties of Alluvial Soils , 2005 .

[23]  S. Campana,et al.  Integration of remote sensing, geophysical surveys and archaeological excavation for the study of a medieval mound (Tuscany, Italy) , 2009 .

[24]  W. Zimmer,et al.  A More Powerful Test for Dispersion Using Distance Measurements , 1986 .

[25]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity , 2005 .

[26]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review . , 2005 .

[27]  Anònim Anònim Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[28]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture , 2003 .

[29]  E. Amezketa Soil salinity assessment using directed soil sampling from a geophysical survey with electromagnetic technology: a case study , 2007 .

[30]  R. G. V. Bramley,et al.  Lessons from nearly 20 years of Precision Agriculture research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate application , 2009 .

[31]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Spatial variability of wine grape yield and quality in Chilean vineyards: economic and environmental impacts. , 2003 .