Ultrasound assessment of tendons in asymptomatic volunteers: a study of reproducibility

The purpose was to evaluate the inter-visit, inter-observer and intra-observer variation of quantitative and qualitative tendon examinations in vivo for a cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eleven healthy male subjects were recruited. The following tendons were assessed by ultrasonography: Achilles tendon, patellar tendon, triceps tendon, extensor pollicis longus, flexor carpi radialis and supraspinatus. For each tendon a quantitative measurement of tendon size was made at a predefined anatomical location. Two experienced sonologists, blind to one another’s findings, evaluated each of the tendons independently. Each tendon was evaluated on two occasions 1 week apart. No difference was found to be attributed to variation in tendon size between visits. Inter-observer variation was a source of error with intra-subject, inter-visit measurements proving more reproducible. There was some significant variation between observers. This variation was more marked with some tendon measures than others. Inter-observer variation for triceps, flexor carpi radialis and supraspinatus was most marked. Minimum detectable change in tendons varied from 13 to 57% depending on the plane of scanning and the tendon being examined. Good reproducibility of quantitative tendon measurements can be achieved within a study using two observers by following a defined scanning protocol. However, it is recommended that the same observer perform serial assessments. The data allow minimal detectable changes in tendon size to be calculated.

[1]  W. Stanish,et al.  Tendinitis: Its etiology and treatment , 1984 .

[2]  B. Fornage Achilles tendon: US examination. , 1986, Radiology.

[3]  F. Kainberger,et al.  Injury of the Achilles tendon: diagnosis with sonography. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  P. Kannus,et al.  Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  S. Sjöberg,et al.  Imaging in chronic achilles tendinopathy: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  F. Kainberger,et al.  Imaging of tendons--adaptation, degeneration, rupture. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[7]  Y. J. Chen,et al.  Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography in stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: sonographic‐surgical correlation. , 1997, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[8]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Histopathological findings in chronic tendon disorders , 1997, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[9]  Pekka Kannus,et al.  Human Tendons: Anatomy, Physiology, and Pathology , 1997 .

[10]  G. Waitches,et al.  Use of Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Tendon Abnormalities Around the Ankle , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  G. Waitches,et al.  Ultrasonographic‐surgical correlation of ankle tendon tears. , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  H. Imhof,et al.  Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (0.2 T) of tendons with sonographic and histologic correlation. Cadaveric study. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[13]  M. Pocoví,et al.  Tamaño del tendón de Aquiles por ecografía de alta resolución en población sana. Relación con las concentraciones lipídicas , 1998 .

[14]  F. Civeira,et al.  [Achilles tendon size by high resolution sonography in healthy population. Relationship with lipid levels]. , 1998, Medicina clinica.

[15]  C Martinoli,et al.  Tendon and nerve sonography. , 1999, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  H. Aronen,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging of the asymptomatic Achilles tendon: new observations. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  R. Martin,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff: spatial compounding and tendon thickness measurement. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  W. Grassi,et al.  Sonographic imaging of tendons. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Achilles tendon injuries. , 2001, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[20]  Stefano Bianchi,et al.  Ultrasound of tendons and nerves , 2001, European Radiology.

[21]  W. Grassi,et al.  Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  P. Richards,et al.  Achilles tendon (TA) size and power Doppler ultrasound (PD) changes compared to MRI: a preliminary observational study. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[23]  S. Reid,et al.  Repeatability of diagnostic ultrasonography in the assessment of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. , 2001, Equine veterinary journal.

[24]  G. Bydder,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Short T 2 Components in Tissue , 2002 .

[25]  F. Kainberger,et al.  Diagnostic value of high-resolution B-mode and doppler sonography for imaging of hand and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  G M Bydder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[27]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Magnetic Resonance: An Introduction to Ultrashort TE (UTE) Imaging , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  Michael Ying,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of the size of Achilles tendon: the effect of exercise and dominance of the ankle. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  G. Riley,et al.  The pathogenesis of tendinopathy. A molecular perspective. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[30]  K. Parkkola,et al.  Anatomy of the Achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus) with respect to tendon thickness measurements , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.