Measuring quantitative effects of methylation on transcription factor–DNA binding affinity

We describe a new method for measuring the effects of epigenetic marks on protein-DNA interactions. Methylation of CpG (cytosine-phosphate-guanine) dinucleotides is a common epigenetic mark that influences gene expression. The effects of methylation on transcription factor (TF) binding are unknown for most TFs and, even when known, such knowledge is often only qualitative. In reality, methylation sensitivity is a quantitative effect, just as changes to the DNA sequence have quantitative effects on TF binding affinity. We describe Methyl-Spec-seq, an easy-to-use method that measures the effects of CpG methylation (mCPG) on binding affinity for hundreds to thousands of variants in parallel, allowing one to quantitatively assess the effects at every position in a binding site. We demonstrate its use on several important DNA binding proteins. We calibrate the accuracy of Methyl-Spec-seq using a novel two-color competitive fluorescence anisotropy method that can accurately determine the relative affinities of two sequences in solution. We also present software that extends standard methods for representing, visualizing, and searching for matches to binding site motifs to include the effects of methylation. These tools facilitate the study of the consequences for gene regulation of epigenetic marks on DNA.

[1]  P. Leder,et al.  A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[2]  D. Schübeler,et al.  Impact of cytosine methylation on DNA binding specificities of human transcription factors , 2017, Science.

[3]  Y. Zuo,et al.  Role of PTCH1 gene methylation in gastric carcinogenesis , 2014, Oncology letters.

[4]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  A quantitative understanding of lac repressor’s binding specificity and flexibility , 2015, Quantitative Biology.

[5]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  Modeling the specificity of protein-DNA interactions , 2013, Quantitative Biology.

[6]  P. Kogerman,et al.  Expression of the PTCH1 tumor suppressor gene is regulated by alternative promoters and a single functional Gli-binding site. , 2004, Gene.

[7]  W. Schaffner,et al.  The CpG-specific methylase SssI has topoisomerase activity in the presence of Mg2+. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Zheng Zuo,et al.  High-Resolution Specificity from DNA Sequencing Highlights Alternative Modes of Lac Repressor Binding , 2014, Genetics.

[9]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Critical DNA Binding Interactions of the Insulator Protein CTCF , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  T. Hughes,et al.  Transcription factors read epigenetics , 2017, Science.

[11]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  The AP-1 transcription factor Batf controls TH17 differentiation , 2009, Nature.

[12]  S. Rutz,et al.  A Genomic Regulatory Element That Directs Assembly and Function of Immune-Specific AP-1–IRF Complexes , 2012, Science.

[13]  A. Frischauf,et al.  Non-consensus GLI binding sites in Hedgehog target gene regulation , 2010, BMC Molecular Biology.

[14]  Shirley M. Tilghman,et al.  CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus , 2000, Nature.

[15]  G. Stormo,et al.  Response Element Composition Governs Correlations between Binding Site Affinity and Transcription in Glucocorticoid Receptor Feed-forward Loops* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Tianyin Zhou,et al.  Evolving insights on how cytosine methylation affects protein–DNA binding , 2014, Briefings in functional genomics.

[17]  D. Schübeler.  Function and information content of DNA methylation , 2015, Nature.

[18]  G. Stormo,et al.  Quantitative specificity of STAT1 and several variants , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  R. Ebright,et al.  Fluorescence anisotropy: rapid, quantitative assay for protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[20]  E. Dermitzakis,et al.  Passive and active DNA methylation and the interplay with genetic variation in gene regulation , 2013, eLife.

[21]  Xiaodong Cheng,et al.  An atomic model of Zfp57 recognition of CpG methylation within a specific DNA sequence. , 2012, Genes & development.

[22]  Jiang Qian,et al.  Transcription factors as readers and effectors of DNA methylation , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[23]  K. Kinzler,et al.  The GLI gene encodes a nuclear protein which binds specific sequences in the human genome , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  V. LeTilly,et al.  Fluorescence anisotropy assays implicate protein-protein interactions in regulating trp repressor DNA binding. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[25]  D. Trono,et al.  In Embryonic Stem Cells, ZFP57/KAP1 Recognize a Methylated Hexanucleotide to Affect Chromatin and DNA Methylation of Imprinting Control Regions , 2011, Molecular cell.

[26]  T. Pieler,et al.  Gli-type zinc finger proteins as bipotential transducers of Hedgehog signaling. , 2002, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[27]  G. Stormo,et al.  Spec-seq: determining protein-DNA-binding specificity by sequencing. , 2015, Briefings in functional genomics.

[28]  M. Muers.  Gene expression: Disentangling DNA methylation , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  Felix Krueger,et al.  Allele-specific binding of ZFP57 in the epigenetic regulation of imprinted and non-imprinted monoallelic expression , 2015, Genome Biology.

[30]  Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al.  DNA-Binding Specificities of Human Transcription Factors , 2013, Cell.

[31]  R. Bhanvadia,et al.  HOXB13 mutations and binding partners in prostate development and cancer: Function, clinical significance, and future directions , 2017, Genes & diseases.

[32]  M. Fernández-Zapico,et al.  Overexpression of mutant Ptch in rhabdomyosarcomas is associated with promoter hypomethylation and increased Gli1 and H3K4me3 occupancy , 2015, Oncotarget.

[33]  A. Bird,et al.  DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  R. Mann,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the DNA Methylation Sensitivity of Transcription Factor Complexes. , 2017, Cell reports.

[35]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. , 2013, Cell reports.

[36]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Hoxb13 is required for normal differentiation and secretory function of the ventral prostate , 2003, Development.

[37]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene , 2000, Nature.

[38]  Alexandre V. Morozov,et al.  Statistical mechanical modeling of genome-wide transcription factor occupancy data by MatrixREDUCE , 2006, ISMB.

[39]  J. Witte,et al.  Imputation of the Rare HOXB13 G84E Mutation and Cancer Risk in a Large Population-Based Cohort , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[40]  C. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of a five-finger GLI-DNA complex: new perspectives on zinc fingers. , 1993, Science.

[41]  Kate B. Cook,et al.  Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity , 2014, Cell.

[42]  Adam P. Joyce,et al.  Quantitative profiling of selective Sox/POU pairing on hundreds of sequences in parallel by Coop-seq , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  A. Hattersley,et al.  Hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci in individuals with transient neonatal diabetes is associated with mutations in ZFP57 , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[44]  Matthew T. Maurano,et al.  Role of DNA Methylation in Modulating Transcription Factor Occupancy. , 2015, Cell reports.

[45]  J. Iwahara,et al.  Thermodynamic Additivity for Impacts of Base-Pair Substitutions on Association of the Egr-1 Zinc-Finger Protein with DNA. , 2016, Biochemistry.

[46]  S. Langley,et al.  Importance of HOX genes in normal prostate gland formation, prostate cancer development and its early detection , 2014, BJU international.