Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Direct Assessment of Anatomic Regurgitant Orifice in Mitral Regurgitation

Background—In patients with mitral regurgitation (MR), assessment of the severity of valvular dysfunction is crucial. Recently, regurgitant orifice area has been proposed as the most useful indicator of the severity of MR. The purpose of our study was to determine whether planimetry of the anatomic regurgitant orifice (ARO) in patients with MR is feasible by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and correlates with invasive catheterization and echocardiography effective regurgitant orifice [ECHO-ERO] by proximal isovelocity surface area. Methods and Results—Planimetry of ARO was performed with a 1.5-T CMR scanner using a breath-hold balanced gradient echo sequence true fast imaging with steady state precession (TrueFISP). CMR planimetry of ARO was possible in 35 of 38 patients and was closely correlated with angiographic grading (r=0.84, P<0.0001). In patients with MR grade ≥III on catheterization, CMR-ARO (0.60±0.29 cm2 versus 0.30±0.19 cm2, P<0.0001) as well as ECHO-ERO (0.49±0.17 cm2 versus 0.27±0.10 cm2) were significantly elevated in comparison with MR grade <III. Further, CMR-ARO was closely correlated to CMR regurgitant fraction and volume (r=0.90 and r=0.91, P<0.0001, respectively) and catheterization regurgitant fraction and volume (r=0.86 and 0.83, P<0.0001, respectively). The correlation between CMR-ARO and ECHO-ERO was 0.81 (P<0.0001) and CMR slightly overestimated ECHO-ERO by 0.06 cm2 (P<0.05). As assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, CMR-ARO at a threshold of 0.40 cm2 detected MR grade ≥III as defined by catheterization, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 94%, respectively. Conclusion—CMR planimetry of the anatomic mitral regurgitant lesion in patients with MR is feasible and permits quantification of MR with good agreement with the accepted invasive and noninvasive methods. Direct measurement by CMR is a promising new method for the precise assessment of ARO area and the severity of MR.

[1]  S. Feuerbach,et al.  Assessment of the anatomic regurgitant orifice in aortic regurgitation: a clinical magnetic resonance imaging study , 2007, Heart.

[2]  W. Nitz,et al.  MRI planimetry for diagnosis and follow-up of valve area in mitral stenosis treated with valvuloplasty. , 2006, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[3]  M. Schemper,et al.  Outcome of Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation , 2006, Circulation.

[4]  S. Globits,et al.  Quantification of regurgitant lesions by MRI , 1990, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[5]  W. Nitz,et al.  Planimetry of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Kurt Debl,et al.  Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Günther,et al.  Cine MR imaging of heart valve dysfunction with segmented true fast imaging with steady state free precession , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  C. Hamm,et al.  Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Levine,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  J. Schulz-Menger,et al.  Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, American heart journal.

[12]  L. Christiaens,et al.  Quantitative assessment of regurgitant flow with total digital three-dimensional reconstruction of color Doppler flow in the convergent region: in vitro validation. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[13]  P. Walker,et al.  Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements. , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[14]  A J Tajik,et al.  Progression of mitral regurgitation: a prospective Doppler echocardiographic study. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Schiller,et al.  The Mitral Regurgitation Index: an echocardiographic guide to severity. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  E. Schwammenthal,et al.  Mechanism of dynamic regurgitant orifice area variation in functional mitral regurgitation: physiologic insights from the proximal flow convergence technique. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  W. Hundley,et al.  Comparison of quantitative Doppler with magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Grading of mitral regurgitation by quantitative Doppler echocardiography: calibration by left ventricular angiography in routine clinical practice. , 1997, Circulation.

[19]  V. Hombach,et al.  [Color Doppler echocardiography of the flow convergence region in vitro: effect of the orifice shape on proximal velocity profile]. , 1996, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[20]  H F Li,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison with invasive techniques. , 1995, Circulation.

[21]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Effective mitral regurgitant orifice area: clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  C. Higgins,et al.  Quantification of mitral regurgitation by velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Effective regurgitant orifice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  D. Mele,et al.  Application of color Doppler flow mapping to calculate effective regurgitant orifice area. An in vitro study and initial clinical observations. , 1993, Circulation.

[25]  D. Sahn,et al.  A New Method for Quantitation of Mitral Regurgitation Based on Color Flow Doppler Imaging of Flow Convergence Proximal to Regurgitant Orifice , 1991, Circulation.

[26]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  A new method for quantification of regurgitant flow rate using color Doppler flow imaging of the flow convergence region proximal to a discrete orifice. An in vitro study. , 1991, Circulation.

[27]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  E. Botvinick,et al.  Quantitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Circulation.

[29]  S. Hanson,et al.  Quantification of mitral valvular incompetence. , 1985, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[30]  E. Alderman,et al.  Ventriculographic and hemodynamic features of mitral regurgitation of cardiomyopathic, rheumatic and nonrheumatic etiology. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  G. Miller,et al.  Left ventricular cine-angio- cardiography in the assessment of mitral regurgitation. , 1969, British heart journal.

[32]  C. Lillehei,et al.  LEFT RETROGRADE CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY IN ACQUIRED CARDIAC DISEASE: TECHNIC, INDICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS IN 700 CASES. , 1964, The American journal of cardiology.