A Computationally Grounded Dynamic Logic of Agency, with an Application to Legal Actions

In this article, we propose a Dynamic Logic of Propositional Control DL-PC in which the concept of 'seeing to it that' (abbreviated stit) as studied by Belnap, Horty and others can be expressed; more precisely, we capture the concept of the so-called Chellas stit theory and the deliberatibe stit theory, as opposed to Belnap's original achievement stit. In this logic, the sentence 'group G sees to it that φ' is defined in terms of dynamic operators: it is paraphrased as 'group G is going to execute an action now such that whatever actions the agents outside G can execute at the same time, φ is true afterwards'. We also prove that the satisfiability problem is decidable. In the second part of the article we extend DL-PC with operators modeling normative concepts, resulting in a logic DL-PCLeg. In particular, we define the concepts of 'legally seeing to it that' and 'illegally seeing to it that'. We prove that the decidability result for DL-PC transfers to DL-PCLeg.

[1]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Wojciech Jamroga,et al.  Agents that Know How to Play , 2004, Fundam. Informaticae.

[3]  Andreas Herzig,et al.  ALTERNATIVE AXIOMATICS AND COMPLEXITY OF DELIBERATIVE STIT THEORIES , 2007, J. Philos. Log..

[4]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Computationally grounded theories of agency , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[5]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Robust normative systems and a logic of norm compliance , 2010, Log. J. IGPL.

[6]  Jan van Eijck,et al.  Logics of communication and change , 2006, Inf. Comput..

[7]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  The Undecidability of Iterated Modal Relativization , 2005, Stud Logica.

[8]  Andreas Herzig,et al.  From Situation Calculus to Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2011, J. Log. Comput..

[9]  N. Belnap,et al.  Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World , 2001 .

[10]  Emiliano Lorini,et al.  A Dynamic Logic of Normative Systems , 2011, IJCAI.

[11]  Jelle Gerbrandy,et al.  Dynamic epistemic logic , 1998 .

[12]  Wiebe van der Hoek,et al.  Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[13]  Alessio Lomuscio,et al.  MCMAS: A Model Checker for Multi-agent Systems , 2006, TACAS.

[14]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the logic of cooperation and propositional control , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the complexity of practical ATL model checking , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[16]  A. Wilm,et al.  Determinism and Non-determinism in PDL , 1991, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[17]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Alternating-time temporal logic , 1999 .

[18]  Andreas Herzig,et al.  Properties of logics of individual and group agency , 2008, Advances in Modal Logic.

[19]  S. Rosenschein,et al.  On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design , 1996 .

[20]  J. Horty Agency and Deontic Logic , 2001 .

[21]  Andreas Herzig,et al.  Coalition games over Kripke semantics : expressiveness and complexity , 2007 .

[22]  Johann A. Makowsky,et al.  Propositional Dynamic Logic with Local Assignments , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[23]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems , 2008 .

[24]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the dynamics of delegation, cooperation, and control: a logical account , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[25]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Cooperation, Knowledge, and Time: Alternating-time Temporal Epistemic Logic and its Applications , 2003, Stud Logica.

[26]  Thomas Ågotnes,et al.  Action and Knowledge in Alternating-Time Temporal Logic , 2006, Synthese.

[27]  Emiliano Lorini,et al.  A Dynamic Logic of Agency I: STIT, Capabilities and Powers , 2010, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[28]  Jan M. Broersen,et al.  Modeling Attempt and Action Failure in Probabilistic STIT Logic , 2011, IJCAI.

[29]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Time, Knowledge, and Cooperation: Alternating-Time Temporal Epistemic Logic and Its Applications , 2002, KI.

[30]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Modal Logic , 2001, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science.

[31]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Reasoning About the Transfer of Control , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[32]  Rajeev Alur,et al.  A Temporal Logic of Nested Calls and Returns , 2004, TACAS.

[33]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Reactive Modules , 1999, Formal Methods Syst. Des..

[34]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  The Deontic Component of Action Language nC+ , 2006, DEON.

[35]  S. Rosenschein,et al.  Computational Theories of Interaction and Agency , 1996 .