Code assessment and modelling for Design Basis Accident Analysis of the European sodium fast reactor design. Part I: System description, modelling and benchmarking

The new reactor concepts proposed in the Generation IV International Forum (GIF) are conceived to improve the use of natural resources, reduce the amount of high-level radioactive waste and excel in their reliability and safe operation. Among these novel designs sodium fast reactors (SFRs) stand out due to their technological feasibility as demonstrated in several countries during the last decades. As part of the contribution of EURATOM to GIF the CP-ESFR is a collaborative project with the objective, among others, to perform extensive analysis on safety issues involving renewed SFR demonstrator designs. The verification of computational tools able to simulate the plant behaviour under postulated accidental conditions by code-to-code comparison was identified as a key point to ensure reactor safety. In this line, several organizations employed coupled neutronic and thermal-hydraulic system codes able to simulate complex and specific phenomena involving multi-physics studies adapted to this particular fast reactor technology. In the “Introduction” of this paper the framework of this study is discussed, the second section describes the envisaged plant design and the commonly agreed upon modelling guidelines. The third section presents a comparative analysis of the calculations performed by each organisation applying their models and codes to a common agreed transient with the objective to harmonize the models as well as validating the implementation of all relevant physical phenomena in the different system codes.

[1]  S. Massara,et al.  Dynamics of Critical Dedicated Cores for Minor Actinide Transmutation , 2005 .

[2]  G. L. Fiorini,et al.  European Commission – 7th Framework Programme: The Collaborative Project on European Sodium Fast Reactor (CP ESFR) , 2011 .

[3]  S. Massara,et al.  Dynamical analysis of innovative core designs facing unprotected transients with the MAT5 DYN code , 2012 .

[4]  Aurélia Chenu,et al.  Single- and Two-Phase Flow Modeling for Coupled Neutronics/Thermal-Hydraulics Transient Analysis of Advanced Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors , 2011 .

[5]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  The design of the prototype Fast Breeder Reactor , 2006 .

[6]  W. M. Schikorr,et al.  Assessments of the kinetic and dynamic transient behavior of sub-critical systems (ADS) in comparison to critical reactor systems , 2001 .

[7]  Pressure drop modeling and comparisons with experiments for single- and two-phase sodium flow , 2011 .

[8]  Konstantin Mikityuk,et al.  Heat transfer to liquid metal: Review of data and correlations for tube bundles , 2009 .

[9]  B. Rameau,et al.  CATHARE 2 V2.5_2: A single version for various applications , 2011 .

[10]  A. M. Tsibulya,et al.  BN-800 design validation and construction status , 2010 .

[11]  Makoto Matsuura,et al.  Design and modification of steam generator safety system of FBR MONJU , 2007 .

[12]  Y. Philipponneau,et al.  Thermal conductivity of (U, Pu)O2−x mixed oxide fuel , 1992 .

[13]  S. Gusmeroli,et al.  Strategic research agenda , 2010 .

[14]  K. Mikityuk,et al.  FRED fuel behaviour code: Main models and analysis of Halden IFA-503.2 tests , 2011 .

[15]  K. Lassmann,et al.  The revised URGAP model to describe the gap conductance between fuel and cladding , 1987 .