An anticipative hyperbolic discount utility on intertemporal decision making

Discount utility is facilitated to scrutinize human decision behaviors for different points in time under the consideration of time preference. Recent studies are extended from two basic models, which are the exponential and the hyperbolic discount models, and the more popular hyperbolic discount model is well recognized for resolving the effects of preference reversal and is less steeply discounting than the exponential discount model. However, to enhance the capability of explaining intertemporal decision making behavior, an anticipative hyperbolic discount utility model was proposed which revised the conventional hyperbolic discount utility by introducing the anticipative parameters under the consideration of anticipation of future gains or losses. An empirical investigation was employed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed anticipative hyperbolic discounting utility model, which was able to empirically go beyond the traditional hyperbolic discounting utility model. Also, the proposed anticipative hyperbolic model is capable of dealing with the anomalies of preference reverse and framing effects.

[1]  J. E. Mazur An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[2]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1987 .

[3]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Discounting in judgments of delay and probability. , 2000 .

[4]  Charles Harvey,et al.  Proportional Discounting of Future Costs and Benefits , 1995, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Martin Ahlbrecht,et al.  An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk , 1997 .

[6]  James E. Reinmuth,et al.  COMPARING IMPUTED AND ACTUAL UTILITY FUNCTIONS IN A COMPETITIVE BIDDING SETTING , 1976 .

[7]  Andrzej S. Nowak A multigenerational dynamic game of resource extraction , 2006, Math. Soc. Sci..

[8]  Charles M. Harvey,et al.  Value functions for infinite-period planning , 1986 .

[9]  R. Thaler Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[11]  P. Samuelson A Note on Measurement of Utility , 1937 .

[12]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting , 1997 .

[13]  Marjorie K. Shelley Outcome signs, question frames and discount rates , 1993 .

[14]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[15]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[16]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement , 1981 .

[17]  J. Cairns,et al.  Valuing future private and social benefits: The discounted utility model versus hyperbolic discounting models , 2000 .

[18]  Luc Wathieu,et al.  Habits and the Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice , 1997 .

[19]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  T. Koopmans Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience , 1960 .

[21]  D. Prelec The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[22]  O. Azfar,et al.  Rationalizing hyperbolic discounting , 1999 .

[23]  G. Loewenstein Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption , 1987 .

[24]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[25]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[27]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Dynamic Choices of Hyperbolic Consumers , 2001 .

[28]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma,et al.  Modelling intertemporal choices: An anomaly approach. , 1996 .