Suppressive Mechanisms in Monkey V1 Help to Solve the Stereo Correspondence Problem

Neurons encode the depth in stereoscopic images by combining the signals from the receptive fields in the two eyes. Local variations in single images can activate neurons that do not signal the correct disparity (false matches), giving rise to the stereo correspondence problem. We used binocular white-noise stimuli to decompose the responses of monkey primary visual cortex V1 neurons into the elements of a linear–nonlinear model (via spike-triggered covariance analysis). In our population of disparity-selective neurons, we find both excitatory and suppressive elements in many of the neurons. Their binocular receptive fields were aligned in a specific push–pull manner for disparity. We demonstrate that this arrangement reduces the responses to false matches but preserves the responses to true matches. The responses of the cells to the noise stimuli were well explained by a linear summation of the elements, followed by a nonlinearity. This model also explained the shape of independently measured disparity-tuning curves, although it overestimated the response magnitude. This study constitutes the first direct physiological evidence for the contribution of suppressive mechanisms to disparity selectivity. This new mechanism contributes to solving the stereo correspondence problem.

[1]  J. Pokorny Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[2]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  G. Poggio,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  H M Sakai,et al.  White-noise analysis in visual neuroscience , 1988, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  William Bialek,et al.  Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[7]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure , 1991, Nature.

[9]  Ning Qian,et al.  Binocular Receptive Field Models, Disparity Tuning, and Characteristic Disparity , 1996, Neural Computation.

[10]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts , 1996, Vision Research.

[11]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[12]  R. Reid,et al.  Synaptic Integration in Striate Cortical Simple Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information II. Complex cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Andrew J. Parker,et al.  Local Disparity Not Perceived Depth Is Signaled by Binocular Neurons in Cortical Area V1 of the Macaque , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Parker,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Touryan,et al.  Isolation of Relevant Visual Features from Random Stimuli for Cortical Complex Cells , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  B. Cumming,et al.  Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M. C. Citron,et al.  Minimum-order Wiener modelling of spike-output systems , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  M. J. Korenberg,et al.  The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Ralph D Freeman,et al.  Temporal dynamics of binocular disparity processing in the central visual pathway. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Ralph D Freeman,et al.  Functional connectivity of disparity-tuned neurons in the visual cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal Elements of Macaque V1 Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[25]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Direction Selectivity of Excitation and Inhibition in Simple Cells of the Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[26]  T. Albright,et al.  Blue-yellow signals are enhanced by spatiotemporal luminance contrast in macaque V1. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[28]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Bruce G. Cumming,et al.  Adaptation to Natural Binocular Disparities in Primate V1 Explained by a Generalized Energy Model , 2008, Neuron.

[30]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying the Transformation of Disparity Signals from V1 to V2 in the Macaque , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.