Optical Modeling and Physical Experiments on Ocular UV Manikins Exposure

The prevalence of age-related cataracts is higher in Asians than Caucasians. Ocular ultraviolet (UV) exposure is an important environmental risk factor leading to age-related cataracts. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the effects of facial anatomy on ocular UV exposure between Asians and Europeans. We built optical models with 3D-printed Asian and European manikins that could truly reflect the typical facial features of Asians and Europeans, monitored the ambient and ocular UV exposure using these models in Fuxin (42.00°N, 121.69°E), China, and used 3ds Max software to model the effects of the facial anatomy structures on the light entering the eyes by rendering the resulting shadows. We found that the ocular UV exposure intensity in the Asian manikin was higher than that in the European manikin at a rotation angle of 282° to 354° when the solar elevation angle (SEA) was approximately 30° to 60° and at a rotation angle of 150° toward the sun when the SEA was approximately above 60°. Based on the optical models we built, we conclude that, due to the differences in the superciliary arch and glabella, the risk of high ocular UV exposure is greater in the Asian manikin than in the European manikin. Our findings provide grounds for speculation about whether the blocking effect of the superciliary arch and glabella of the European manikin on ocular UV exposure is one of the reasons for the higher prevalence of age-related cataracts in Asians than in Europeans.

[1]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Latitudinal variation in light levels drives human visual system size , 2012, Biology Letters.

[2]  H. Taylor,et al.  Number of People Blind or Visually Impaired by Cataract Worldwide and in World Regions, 1990 to 2010. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Valeria Bernal,et al.  Variation and causal factors of craniofacial robusticity in Patagonian hunter‐gatherers from the late Holocene , 2006, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[4]  Lumila Paula Menéndez,et al.  Moderate climate signature in cranial anatomy of late holocene human populations from Southern South America. , 2018, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  Andrew Harris,et al.  Anthropology , 1907, Nature.

[6]  Tiziano Baccetti,et al.  Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults. , 2011, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  Hayder Abdallah Hashim,et al.  Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study. , 2003, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[8]  Yaming Cui,et al.  Environment‐Related Variation in the Human Mid‐Face , 2017, Anatomical record.

[9]  Boris Suchan,et al.  BESST (Bochum Emotional Stimulus Set)—A pilot validation study of a stimulus set containing emotional bodies and faces from frontal and averted views , 2013, Psychiatry Research.

[10]  L. Farkas,et al.  Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian Faces Using Neoclassical Facial Canons as Criteria , 2002, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[11]  D. Pascolini,et al.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010 , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  Anna Midelfart,et al.  Ultraviolet radiation and cataract. , 2005, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[13]  Louis D. Pizzarello,et al.  Smoking Cessation and Risk of Age-Related Cataract in Men , 2001 .

[14]  James A McNamara,et al.  Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. , 2002, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  Vahid Rakhshan,et al.  Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[16]  C. H. Kau,et al.  Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging. , 2013, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[17]  B Rosner,et al.  A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of cataract in men. , 1992, JAMA.

[18]  Christopher R Forrest,et al.  International Anthropometric Study of Facial Morphology in Various Ethnic Groups/Races , 2005, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[19]  K K Lew,et al.  Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. , 1992, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[20]  Alan Shiels,et al.  Molecular Genetics of Cataract. , 2014, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science.

[21]  Tien Yin Wong,et al.  Ancestry, Socioeconomic Status, and Age-Related Cataract in Asians: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Yang Liu,et al.  Risk of Ocular Exposure to Biologically Effective UV Radiation in Different Geographical Directions , 2014, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[23]  Teresa Souto,et al.  Facial emotional recognition in schizophrenia: preliminary results of the virtual reality program for facial emotional recognition , 2013 .

[24]  Peter Claes,et al.  Investigating the case of human nose shape and climate adaptation , 2017, PLoS genetics.

[25]  Wenyong Huang,et al.  Variations and Trends in Health Burden of Visual Impairment Due to Cataract: A Global Analysis. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Fen Xu,et al.  Children's and Adults' Judgments of Facial Trustworthiness: The Relationship to Facial Attractiveness , 2015, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  A. Kwok,et al.  Ultraviolet light and ocular diseases , 2014, International Ophthalmology.