Combined advanced finishing and UV-laser conditioning for producing UV-damage-resistant fused-silica optics

Laser-induced damage initiation on fused silica optics can limit the lifetime of the components when used in high power UV laser environments. For example in inertial confinement fusion research applications, the optics can be exposed to temporal laser pulses of about 3 nsec with average fluences of 8 J/cm2 and peak fluences between 12 and 15 J/cm2. During the past year, we have focused on optimizing the damage performance at a wavelength of 355-nm (3(omega) ), 3-nsec pulse length, for optics in this category by examining a variety of finishing technologies with a challenge to improve the laser damage initiation density by at least two orders of magnitude. In this paper, we describe recent advances in improving the 3(omega) damage initiation performance of laboratory-scale zirconium oxide and cerium oxide conventionally finished fused silica optics via application of processes incorporating magnetorheological finishing (MRF), wet chemical etching, and UV laser conditioning. Details of the advanced finishing procedures are described and comparisons are made between the procedures based upon large area 3(omega) damage performance, polishing layer contamination, and optical subsurface damage.

[1]  I C Smith,et al.  Performance of a prototype for a large-aperture multipass Nd:glass laser for inertial confinement fusion. , 1997, Applied optics.

[2]  Stephen D. Jacobs,et al.  Precision optics fabrication using magnetorheological finishing , 1997, Optics + Photonics.

[3]  Michael J. Runkel,et al.  Improving 351-nm damage performance of large-aperture fused silica and DKDP optics , 2002, SPIE Laser Damage.

[4]  William Kordonski,et al.  Magnetorheological finishing (MRF) in commercial precision optics manufacturing , 1999, Optics + Photonics.

[5]  Mark R. Kozlowski,et al.  Subsurface damage and polishing compound affect the 355-nm laser damage threshold of fused silica surfaces , 1998, Laser Damage.

[6]  G. Spierings.  Wet chemical etching of silicate glasses in hydrofluoric acid based solutions , 1993 .

[7]  Lawrence W. Hrubesh,et al.  Localized CO2-laser treatment for mitigation of 351-nm damage growth in fused silica , 2002, SPIE Laser Damage.

[8]  Stephen D. Jacobs,et al.  Magnetorheological-suspension-based finishing technology , 1998, Smart Structures.

[9]  Mark R. Kozlowski,et al.  Current 3-ω large optic test procedures and data analysis for the quality assurance of National Ignition Facility optics , 1999, Laser Damage.

[10]  J. R. Murray.  Overview of the National Ignition Facility , 1998 .

[11]  Alberto Salleo,et al.  Crack propagation in fused silica during UV and IR ns-laser illumination , 1999 .

[12]  Pierre Garrec,et al.  Technological processing of silica as seen through laser-induced damage tests , 2002, SPIE Laser Damage.

[13]  Stephen D. Jacobs,et al.  Details of the polishing spot in magnetorheological finishing (MRF) , 1999, Optics + Photonics.

[14]  Zhengtian Gu,et al.  Influence of glass surface layers on laser-induced damage threshold , 2002, SPIE Laser Damage.

[15]  Stephen D. Jacobs,et al.  Magnetorheological finishing: a deterministic process for optics manufacturing , 1995, Other Conferences.

[16]  Michael D. Feit,et al.  Initiation, growth, and mitigation of UV-laser-induced damage in fused silica , 2002, SPIE Laser Damage.

[17]  S. Jacobs,et al.  Experiments and observations regarding the mechanisms of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing. , 2001, Applied optics.

[18]  Michael D. Feit,et al.  Methods for mitigating surface damage growth in NIF final optics , 2002, SPIE Laser Damage.