Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations

Microbial contamination is a pervasive problem in any ethanol fermentation system. These infections can at minimum affect the efficiency of the fermentation and at their worse lead to stuck fermentations causing plants to shut down for cleaning before beginning anew. These delays can result in costly loss of time as well as lead to an increased cost of the final product. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the most common bacterial contaminants found in ethanol production facilities and have been linked to decreased ethanol production during fermentation. Lactobacillus sp. generally predominant as these bacteria are well adapted for survival under high ethanol, low pH and low oxygen conditions found during fermentation. It has been generally accepted that lactobacilli cause inhibition of Saccharomyces sp. and limit ethanol production through two basic methods; either production of lactic and acetic acids or through competition for nutrients. However, a number of researchers have demonstrated that these mechanisms may not completely account for the amount of loss observed and have suggested other means by which bacteria can inhibit yeast growth and ethanol production. While LAB are the primary contaminates of concern in industrial ethanol fermentations, wild yeast may also affect the productivity of these fermentations. Though many yeast species have the ability to thrive in a fermentation environment, Dekkera bruxellensis has been repeatedly targeted and cited as one of the main contaminant yeasts in ethanol production. Though widely studied for its detrimental effects on wine, the specific species–species interactions between D. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae are still poorly understood.

[1]  J M Jay,et al.  Antimicrobial properties of diacetyl , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  G. P. Casey,et al.  High-Gravity Brewing: Influence of High-Ethanol Beer on the Viability of Contaminating Brewing Bacteria , 1986 .

[3]  L. Axelsson,et al.  In VitroStudies on Reuterin Synthesis byLactobacillus reuteri , 1989 .

[4]  L. Axelsson,et al.  In Vitro Studies on Reuterin Synthesis by Lactobacillus reuteri , 2009 .

[5]  W. Dobrogosz,et al.  Antagonistic activities of lactic acid bacteria in food and feed fermentations. , 1990, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[6]  D. Makanjuola,et al.  Some effects of lactic acid bacteria on laboratory-scale yeast fermentations , 1992 .

[7]  M. Loureiro-Dias,et al.  Resistance of food spoilage yeasts to sorbic acid , 1994 .

[8]  Byung Hong Kim,et al.  Bacterial Contamination and Its Effects on Ethanol Fermentation , 1995 .

[9]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  J. Guillamón,et al.  Rapid identification of wine yeast species based on RFLP analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region , 1998, Archives of Microbiology.

[11]  H. Odendaal,et al.  Characterization of pentocin TV35b, a bacteriocin‐like peptide isolated from Lactobacillus pentosus with a fungistatic effect on Candida albicans , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.

[12]  O. Claisse,et al.  Assimilation of glycerol by a strain of Lactobacillus collinoides isolated from cider , 2000 .

[13]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi‐continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[14]  J. Schnürer,et al.  Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp.coryniformis Strain Si3 Produces a Broad-Spectrum Proteinaceous Antifungal Compound , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  F. Klis,et al.  A new strategy for inhibition of the spoilage yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii based on combination of a membrane-active peptide with an oligosaccharide that leads to an impaired glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-dependent yeast wall protein layer. , 2001, FEMS yeast research.

[16]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation , 2001, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Influence of Medium Buffering Capacity on Inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Growth by Acetic and Lactic Acids , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  M. Malfeito-Ferreira,et al.  Spoilage yeasts in the wine industry. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[19]  J. Schnürer,et al.  Antifungal 3-Hydroxy Fatty Acids from Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 14 , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  M. Malfeito-Ferreira,et al.  Factors affecting the production of 4-ethylphenol by the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis in enological conditions , 2003 .

[21]  J. Schnürer,et al.  Broad and complex antifungal activity among environmental isolates of lactic acid bacteria. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.

[22]  D. A. Abbott,et al.  Growth rates of Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts hinder their ability to compete with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch corn mash fermentations , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[23]  T. Leathers,et al.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production , 2004, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[24]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Inhibition of yeast by lactic acid bacteria in continuous culture: nutrient depletion and/or acid toxicity? , 2004, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[25]  M. A. Morais,et al.  Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting , 2005, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[26]  F. Tavares Control of spoilage yeasts in fuel ethanol production , 1995, Biotechnology Letters.

[27]  F. Letourneau,et al.  Inhibition of beet molasses alcoholic fermentation by lactobacilli , 1990, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[28]  M. G. Aguilar-Uscanga,et al.  Selective antimicrobial action of chitosan against spoilage yeasts in mixed culture fermentations , 2004, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[29]  N. Narendranath,et al.  Relationship between pH and Medium Dissolved Solids in Terms of Growth and Metabolism of Lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during Ethanol Production , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  J. De Morais,et al.  Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting , 2005, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[31]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  The importance of aeration strategy in fuel alcohol fermentations contaminated with Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[32]  J. Schnürer,et al.  Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives , 2005 .

[33]  J. De Morais,et al.  Contaminant yeast detection in industrial ethanol fermentation must by rDNA‐PCR , 2005, Letters in applied microbiology.

[34]  N. Narendranath,et al.  Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash , 2006, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[35]  N. Narendranath,et al.  Interaction effects of lactic acid and acetic acid at different temperatures on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[36]  P. R. de Araujo,et al.  Detection and Identification of Wild Yeast Contaminants of the Industrial Fuel Ethanol Fermentation Process , 2008, Current Microbiology.

[37]  J. De Morais,et al.  Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[38]  J. Schnürer,et al.  Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini Form a Stable Ethanol-Producing Consortium in a Commercial Alcohol Production Process , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[39]  David Pimentel,et al.  Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems : benefits and risks , 2008 .

[40]  M. A. Morais,et al.  Polyhexamethyl biguanide can eliminate contaminant yeasts from fuel-ethanol fermentation process , 2008, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[41]  W. Grajek,et al.  Ammonia disinfection of corn grains intended for ethanol fermentation , 2009 .

[42]  Vasco Azevedo,et al.  Diversity of lactic acid bacteria of the bioethanol process , 2010, BMC Microbiology.

[43]  J. Schnürer,et al.  Fermentation characteristics of Dekkera bruxellensis strains , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[44]  Steven C Ricke,et al.  Current perspectives on detection of microbial contamination in bioethanol fermentors. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[45]  Alya Limayem,et al.  Antimicrobial strategies for limiting bacterial contaminants in fuel bioethanol fermentations , 2011 .