Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship.

OBJECTIVE This study examined patients' experiences talking to their providers about internet health information. METHODS Participants (n=770) recruited from internet health message boards completed an online survey, including questions focusing on a recent interaction with a provider about internet health information. RESULTS Face-saving patient introduction strategies were associated with providers validating patients' efforts. Providers' validation of patients' efforts was associated with higher patient ratings of satisfaction, validation, and reduced concern, while providers' disagreement with the information was associated with lower ratings. The provider taking the information seriously was associated with higher patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION An understanding of the occurrence of provider-patient talk about internet health information and its relationship to patient satisfaction, validation, and reduced concern is important for providers and medical educators who seek to better understand, and thus improve, provider-patient communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Showing the patient that the information is being seriously considered and validating the patients' efforts in researching the information may ameliorate some of the negative effects of disagreement.

[1]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Christina M. Sabee,et al.  Exploration of the Construct of Reliance Among Patients Who Talk with Their Providers About Internet Information , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[3]  A. Broom Virtually He@lthy: The Impact of Internet Use on Disease Experience and the Doctor-Patient Relationship , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[4]  C. Daugherty,et al.  Use of the internet to obtain cancer information among cancer patients at an urban county hospital. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  R. Lazarus Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[6]  Christopher N. Sciamanna,et al.  Brief Report: What types of internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  J. Allison,et al.  Users of Internet Health Information: Differences by Health Status , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  J. Sitzia,et al.  Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[9]  E. Basch,et al.  Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions , 2004, Cancer.

[10]  A. Ash,et al.  Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  M. Stewart,et al.  Outcomes of patient-provider interaction. , 2003 .

[12]  S. Wyatt,et al.  The Role of the Internet in Patient-Practitioner Relationships: Findings from a Qualitative Research Study , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Joseph A. Diaz,et al.  Patients’ use of the internet for medical information , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[14]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Sarah Bauerle Bass,et al.  Relationships among Internet health information use, patient behavior and self efficacy in newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's NCI Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS) , 2002, AMIA.

[17]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[18]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[19]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[20]  T. Thompson Handbook of health communication , 2008 .

[21]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[22]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Internet Health Resources , 2003 .

[23]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[24]  L. Baker,et al.  Internet use and stigmatized illness. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[25]  Amy Aldridge Sanford,et al.  Patients' Reasons for Refraining from Discussing Internet Health Information with Their Healthcare Providers , 2008, Health communication.