Resource Competition Shapes the Response of Genetic Circuits

A common approach to design genetic circuits is to compose gene expression cassettes together. While appealing, this modular approach is challenged by the fact that expression of each gene depends on the availability of transcriptional/translational resources, which is in turn determined by the presence of other genes in the circuit. This raises the question of how competition for resources by different genes affects a circuit’s behavior. Here, we create a library of genetic activation cascades in bacteria E. coli, where we explicitly tune the resource demand by each gene. We develop a general Hill-function-based model that incorporates resource competition effects through resource demand coefficients. These coefficients lead to non-regulatory interactions among genes that reshape circuit’s behavior. For the activation cascade, such interactions result in surprising biphasic or monotonically decreasing responses. Finally, we use resource demand coefficients to guide the choice of ribosome binding site (RBS) and DNA copy number to restore the cascade’s intended monotonically increasing response. Our results demonstrate how unintended circuit’s behavior arises from resource competition and provide a model-guided methodology to minimize the resulting effects.

[1]  Thomas E Gorochowski,et al.  A Minimal Model of Ribosome Allocation Dynamics Captures Trade-offs in Expression between Endogenous and Synthetic Genes. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[2]  Frederick C. Neidhardt,et al.  Escherichia coli and Salmonella :cellular and molecular biology , 2016 .

[3]  C. Rodríguez-Caso,et al.  Dealing with the genetic load in bacterial synthetic biology circuits: convergences with the Ohm's law , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  Yi Li,et al.  Discriminating direct and indirect connectivities in biological networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  A model for competition for ribosomes in the cell , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Isocost Lines Describe the Cellular Economy of Genetic Circuits , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[7]  H. Salis,et al.  A portable expression resource for engineering cross-species genetic circuits and pathways , 2015, Nature Communications.

[8]  Phillip M. Rivera,et al.  Synthetic tunable amplifying buffer circuit in E. coli. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[9]  G. Stan,et al.  Quantifying cellular capacity identifies gene expression designs with reduced burden , 2015, Nature Methods.

[10]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Modularity, context-dependence, and insulation in engineered biological circuits , 2015 .

[11]  D. Vecchio,et al.  Biomolecular Feedback Systems , 2014 .

[12]  Deepak Mishra,et al.  A load driver device for engineering modularity in biological networks , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  A ‘resource allocator’ for transcription based on a highly fragmented T7 RNA polymerase , 2014, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  Howard J. Li,et al.  Rapid and tunable post-translational coupling of genetic circuits , 2014, Nature.

[15]  R. Murray,et al.  Gene circuit performance characterization and resource usage in a cell-free "breadboard". , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[16]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Principles of genetic circuit design , 2014, Nature Methods.

[17]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Translational cross talk in gene networks. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Vivek K. Mutalik,et al.  Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements , 2013, Nature Methods.

[19]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Retroactivity controls the temporal dynamics of gene transcription. , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[20]  Teruo Fujii,et al.  Computing with competition in biochemical networks. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[21]  James J Collins,et al.  Insulating gene circuits from context by RNA processing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Stefan Klumpp,et al.  Mechanisms and economy of molecular machines , 2012 .

[23]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Ribozyme-based insulator parts buffer synthetic circuits from genetic context , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  A. Arkin,et al.  Contextualizing context for synthetic biology – identifying causes of failure of synthetic biological systems , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[25]  Y. Rondelez Competition for catalytic resources alters biological network dynamics. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[26]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  How Molecular Competition Influences Fluxes in Gene Expression Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Kevin V Solomon,et al.  The zero‐sum game of pathway optimization: Emerging paradigms for tuning gene expression , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[28]  T. Hwa,et al.  Growth Rate-Dependent Global Effects on Gene Expression in Bacteria , 2009, Cell.

[29]  L. You,et al.  Emergent bistability by a growth-modulating positive feedback circuit. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[30]  J. Chin,et al.  Synthesis of orthogonal transcription-translation networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  The biphasic behavior of incoherent feed-forward loops in biomolecular regulatory networks. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[32]  Uri Alon,et al.  The incoherent feed-forward loop can generate non-monotonic input functions for genes , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[33]  Andrew D. Ellington,et al.  Engineering stochasticity in gene expression. , 2008, Molecular bioSystems.

[34]  Daniel M. Stoebel,et al.  The Cost of Expression of Escherichia coli lac Operon Proteins Is in the Process, Not in the Products , 2008, Genetics.

[35]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[36]  E. Greenberg,et al.  A Mutational Analysis Defines Vibrio fischeri LuxR Binding Sites , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  W. Lim,et al.  In vitro binding of purified NahR regulatory protein with promoter Psal. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[38]  Bartholomew Canton,et al.  Engineering the Interface Between Cellular Chassis and Integrated Biological Systems , 2005 .

[39]  R. Weiss,et al.  Ultrasensitivity and noise propagation in a synthetic transcriptional cascade. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Neural Network Computation by In Vitro Transcriptional Circuits , 2004, NIPS.

[41]  J. Keasling,et al.  Low-copy plasmids can perform as well as or better than high-copy plasmids for metabolic engineering of bacteria. , 2000, Metabolic engineering.

[42]  C. Kurland,et al.  Gratuitous overexpression of genes in Escherichia coli leads to growth inhibition and ribosome destruction , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[43]  M. Sørensen,et al.  Synthesis of proteins in Escherichia coli is limited by the concentration of free ribosomes. Expression from reporter genes does not always reflect functional mRNA levels. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  G. Churchward,et al.  Transcription in bacteria at different DNA concentrations , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[45]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Modularity, context-dependence, and insulation in engineered biological circuits. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[46]  U. Alon An Introduction to Systems Biology Design Principles of Biological Circuits , 2007 .

[47]  H. Bremer Modulation of Chemical Composition and Other Parameters of the Cell by Growth Rate , 1999 .