Breaks and task switches in prospective memory

SUMMARY Based on research showing that easing task demands improves prospective memory, we examined the effects of breaks and task switches on prospective memory. The first experiment suggested that people tend not to take advantage of breaks to improve prospective memory unless specifically instructed to do so. The next two experiments showed that both breaks and task switches interfered with prospective memory. The results indicate that work settings with frequent breaks and task switches may be especially susceptible to prospective memory failure. Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Memory for intentions: The effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity , 1971 .

[2]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[3]  K. Dismukes,et al.  Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing , 2005, Memory.

[4]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Loukia D. Loukopoulos,et al.  COCKPIT INTERRUPTIONS AND DISTRACTIONS: A LINE OBSERVATION STUDY , 2001 .

[6]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  R. Marsh,et al.  Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  E. Thorndike.  The Teacher's Word Book , 2007 .

[9]  R. Marsh,et al.  The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  M. McDaniel,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.1002 Delaying Execution of Intentions: Overcoming the Costs of Interruptions , 2022 .

[11]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Prospective memory: When reminders fail , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Rebekah E. Smith.  The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  M. Bradley,et al.  Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. , 1983 .

[14]  L. Kvavilashvili.  Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory , 1987 .

[15]  Melissa J. Guynn,et al.  A two‐process model of strategic monitoring in event‐based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking , 2003 .

[16]  E. John Orav,et al.  Risk Factors for Retained Instruments and Sponges after Surgery , 2003 .