Matrix projection models meet variation in the real world

Projection matrices have become the dominant modelling approach in plant demography because they (i) are relatively easy to formulate, (ii) compile complex data in a structured and analytically tractable manner, (iii) provide numerous parameters with direct biological meaning, (iv) allow the investigator to address broad or specific, experimental and/or theoretical, ecological and evolutionary questions, and (v) produce uniform outputs, enabling direct comparisons between the results of different studies. The last decade has witnessed major advancements in this field that have brought demographic models much closer to the real world, in particular in the analysis of effects of spatial and temporal environmental variation on populations. The present Special Feature contributes to that progress with novel methodologies and applications on Integral Projection Models, stochastic Life Table Response Experiment analyses, stochastic elasticities, transient dynamics and phylogenetic analyses. Synthesis. Environmental stochasticity is an integral part of ecosystems, and plant populations exhibit a tremendous array of demographic strategies to deal with its effects. The analytical challenge of understanding how populations avoid, tolerate or depend on stochasticity is finally overcome with the new matrix approaches. The tools are now available to interpret the effects of changes in temporal and spatial variation on plant populations. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation

[1]  G. Hartshorn A Matrix Model of Tree Population Dynamics , 1975 .

[2]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  A Stage‐Based Population Model for Loggerhead Sea Turtles and Implications for Conservation , 1987 .

[4]  D. O. Logofet Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[5]  J. Heesterbeek,et al.  WEED POPULATIONS AND CROP ROTATIONS: EXPLORING DYNAMICS OF A STRUCTURED PERIODIC SYSTEM , 2002 .

[6]  F. Weckerly MATRIX POPULATION MODELS: CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION , 2008 .

[7]  Ian J. Fiske,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and plant populations: is what we know demographically irrelevant? , 2009 .

[8]  M. Gadgil,et al.  Studies on Plant Demography: Ranunculus Repens L., R. Bulbosus L. and R. Acris L.: III. A Mathematical Model Incorporating Multiple Modes of Reproduction , 1974 .

[9]  H. de Kroon,et al.  Region versus site variation in the population dynamics of three short‐lived perennials , 2010 .

[10]  B. Kendall,et al.  Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability. , 2008, Ecology.

[11]  J. Silvertown,et al.  A COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF PLANTS BASED UPON ELASTICITIES OF VITAL RATES , 2004 .

[12]  Miguel Franco,et al.  comparative plant demography - relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials , 1993 .

[13]  H. Kroon,et al.  ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS , 2000 .

[14]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Population Growth Rates and Age Versus Stage-Distribution Models for Teasel (Dipsacus Sylvestris Huds.) , 1977 .

[15]  H. Caswell,et al.  Projection matrices in population biology. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Katriona Shea,et al.  ESTIMATING BIOCONTROL AGENT IMPACT WITH MATRIX MODELS: CARDUUS NUTANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 1998 .

[17]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[18]  J. Cohen Ergodicity of Age Structure in Populations with Markovian Vital Rates, I: Countable States , 1976 .

[19]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Time, transients and elasticity. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[20]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Integral projection models for populations in temporally varying environments , 2009 .

[21]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Loop analysis: evaluating life history pathways in population projection matrices. , 1994 .

[22]  H. Caswell Analysis of life table response experiments I. Decomposition of effects on population growth rate , 1989 .

[23]  S. Ellner,et al.  SIZE‐SPECIFIC SENSITIVITY: APPLYING A NEW STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL , 2000 .

[24]  H. Caswell Sensitivity analysis of transient population dynamics. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[25]  J. Ogden,et al.  Applications of transition matrix models in forest dynamics: Araucaria in Papua New Guinea and Nothofagus in New Zealand , 1979 .

[26]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  The Many Growth Rates and Elasticities of Populations in Random Environments , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[27]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  S. Pavard,et al.  All paths to fitness lead through demography , 2007 .

[29]  H. Caswell,et al.  Demographic Responses of Estuarine Polychaetes to Pollutants: Life Table Response Experiments , 1996 .

[30]  C. Horvitz,et al.  Context‐dependent pollinator limitation in stochastic environments: can increased seed set overpower the cost of reproduction in an understorey herb? , 2010 .

[31]  B. Sæther,et al.  Life History Variation, Population Processes and Priorities in Species Conservation: Towards a Reunion of Research Paradigms , 1996 .

[32]  H. Caswell Life table response experiment analysis of the stochastic growth rate , 2010 .

[33]  H. Caswell,et al.  Environment-specific elasticity and sensitivity analysis of the stochastic growth rate , 2009 .

[34]  J. Maron,et al.  Using experiments, demography and population models to estimate interaction strength based on transient and asymptotic dynamics , 2010 .

[35]  Pieter A. Zuidema,et al.  Integral Projection Models for trees: a new parameterization method and a validation of model output , 2010 .

[36]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Comparing plant life histories using elasticity analysis: the importance of life span and the number of life-cycle stages , 1995, Oecologia.

[37]  R. Lande,et al.  A Quantitative Genetic Theory of Life History Evolution , 1982 .

[38]  Optimal life histories and age-specific costs of reproduction: two extensions. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  P. V. Tienderen,et al.  ELASTICITIES AND THE LINK BETWEEN DEMOGRAPHIC AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS , 2000 .

[40]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Demographic effects of extreme weather events on a short‐lived calcareous grassland species: stochastic life table response experiments , 2010 .

[41]  Hans de Kroon,et al.  Elasticity Analysis in Population Biology: Methods and Applications1 , 2000 .

[42]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Elasticity: The Relative Contribution of Demographic Parameters to Population Growth Rate , 1986 .

[43]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  J. Gurevitch,et al.  Population Numbers Count: Tools for Near‐Term Demographic Analysis , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[45]  M. Usher,et al.  A Matrix Approach to the Management of Renewable Resources, with Special Reference to Selection Forests , 1966 .

[46]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Transient Behavior and Life History Analysis of Teasel (Dipsacus Sylvestris Huds.) , 1978 .

[47]  S. Tuljapurkar,et al.  PLANT-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS IN RANDOM ENVIRONMENTS: HABITAT-STAGE ELASTICITY, SEED PREDATORS, AND HURRICANES , 2005 .

[48]  R. Salguero‐Gómez,et al.  Keeping plant shrinkage in the demographic loop , 2010 .

[49]  H. Caswell PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE PERTURBATION ANALYSES: THEIR ROLES IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2000 .

[50]  S. Townley,et al.  Predicting transient amplification in perturbed ecological systems , 2007 .

[51]  Hal Caswell,et al.  DEMOGRAPHY AND DISPERSAL: CALCULATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF INVASION SPEED FOR STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 2000 .

[52]  S. Townley,et al.  Boom or bust? A comparative analysis of transient population dynamics in plants , 2010 .

[53]  R. Bornkamm Studies on plant demography: by J. White, 1986, Academic Press Inc., Publishers, Orlando, Florida 32887, U.S.A., 391 pp., price $59.50/£44.00, hardcover, ISBN: 0-12-746630-4. , 1986 .

[54]  L. Antonio Vélez-Espino,et al.  Characterization of elasticity patterns of North American freshwater fishes , 2006 .

[55]  John Sabo,et al.  Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA , 2003 .

[56]  ERGODICITY OF AGE STRUCTURE IN POPULATIONS WITH MARKOVIAN VITAL RATES , 111 : FINITE-STATE MOMENTS AND GROWTH RATE , 2005 .

[57]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population Dynamics in Variable Environments , 1990 .

[58]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  Empirical tests of life‐history evolution theory using phylogenetic analysis of plant demography , 2010 .