Proactive, Reactive, and Interactive Risk Assessment and Management of URET Implementation in Air Route Traffic Control Centers

The current trend within air traffic management (ATM), as a part of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen), is to increase the airspace system capacity to operate in diminishing capacity conditions while improving standards of safety. An extensive body of research exists regarding introducing automation into air traffic control in order to create more flexible and cost-efficient operations. The User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) is a strategic support tool designed to assist controllers with timely detection of conflicts; it offers tools for checking the conflict resolution clearances. This study develops general proactive, reactive, and interactive approaches for the risk assessment and management of the system in order to achieve quality (safety and serviceability) and reliability; it also presents a case study of URET implementation in Air Route Traffic Control Centers in the past ten years. First, the reactive approach, used in URET deployment, is developed, followed by developing the complementary and necessary proactive and interactive approaches. Safety Management and Assessment (SMAS) evaluation is performed for the reactive approach. Findings show that many factors led to cases of URET usage deviating from that provided for in the original design, and for using URET less often than it was originally intended.

[1]  Kelly Harwood,et al.  Defining Human-Centered System Issues for Verifying and Validating Air Traffic Control Systems , 1993 .

[2]  Tatjana Bolic,et al.  Automation Adoption and Adaptation in Air Trac Control , 2006 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Flight to the Future: Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Edited by Christopher D. Wickens, Anne S. Mavor, & James P. McGee 1997, 368 pages, $44.95. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ISBN 0-309-05637-3 , 1997 .

[4]  W. C. Young,et al.  Air traffic control system management , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 2000. Engineering Tomorrow (Cat. No.00CH37093).

[5]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[6]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Human error in European air traffic management: the HERA project , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Denis Javaux Human error, safety, and systems development in aviation , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Automation in Future Air Traffic Management: Effects of Decision Aid Reliability on Controller Performance and Mental Workload , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Distribution of Attention, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Passive Air Traffic Control Task: Implications for Operational Errors and Automation , 1998 .

[10]  S. Bennett Beyond Aviation Human Factors , 2003 .

[11]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  New challenges in organizational research: high reliability organizations , 1989 .