Minimal Preference Elicitation in Combinatorial Auctions

Combinatorial auctions (CAs) where bidders can bid on bundles of items can be very desirable market mechanisms when the items sold exhibit complementarity and/or substitutability, so the bidder’s valuations for bundles are not additive. However, in a basic CA, the bidders may need to bid on exponentially many bundles, leading to difficulties in determining those valuations, undesirable information revelation, and unnecessary communication. In this paper we present a design of an auctioneer agent that uses topological structure inherent in the problem to reduce the amount of information that it needs from the bidders. An analysis tool is presented as well as data structures for storing and optimally assimilating the information received from the bidders. Using this information, the agent then narrows down the set of desirable (welfare maximizing or Pareto efficient) allocations, and decides which questions to ask next. Several algorithms are presented that ask the bidders for value, order, and rank information.

[1]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[2]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[3]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[4]  Subhash Suri,et al.  Improved Algorithms for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions and Generalizations , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[5]  David Levine,et al.  CABOB: A Fast Optimal Algorithm for Combinatorial Auctions , 2001, IJCAI.

[6]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[7]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  AkBA: a progressive, anonymous-price combinatorial auction , 2000, EC '00.

[8]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Computationally Limited Agents in Auctions , 2001 .

[9]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Taming the Computational Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions: Optimal and Approximate Approaches , 1999, IJCAI.

[10]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Issues in Computational Vickrey Auctions , 2000, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[11]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Preventing Strategic Manipulation in Iterative Auctions: Proxy Agents and Price-Adjustment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[12]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[13]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Optimal Auction Design for Agents with Hard Valuation Problems , 1999, Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce.

[14]  Phz eMKMLafgZ,et al.  iBundle: An Efficient Ascending Price Bundle Auction , 1999 .

[15]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Iterative Combinatorial Auctions: Theory and Practice , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  David Levine,et al.  Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations , 2002, AAMAS '02.