An Intensive Exercise Program Using a Technology-Enriched Rehabilitation Gym for the Recovery of Function in People With Chronic Stroke: Usability Study

BACKGROUND Rehabilitation improves poststroke recovery with greater effect for many when applied intensively within enriched environments. The failure of health care providers to achieve minimum recommendations for rehabilitation motivated the development of a technology-enriched rehabilitation gym (TERG) that enables individuals under supervision to perform high-intensity self-managed exercises safely in an enriched environment. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the TERG approach and gather preliminary evidence of its effect for future research. METHODS This feasibility study recruited people well enough to exercise but living with motor impairment following a stroke at least 12 months previously. Following assessment, an 8-week exercise program using a TERG (eg, virtual reality treadmills, power-assisted equipment, balance trainers, and upper limb training systems) was structured in partnership with participants. The feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adherence rates along with participant interviews. Effect sizes were calculated from the mean change in standard outcome measures. RESULTS In total, 70 individuals registered interest, the first 50 were invited for assessment, 39 attended, and 31 were eligible and consented. Following a pilot study (n=5), 26 individuals (mean age 60.4, SD 13.3 years; mean 39.0, SD 29.2 months post stroke; n=17 males; n=10 with aphasia) were recruited to a feasibility study, which 25 individuals completed. Participants attended an average of 18.7 (SD 6.2) sessions with an 82% attendance rate. Reasons for nonattendance related to personal life, illness, weather, care, and transport. In total, 19 adverse events were reported: muscle or joint pain, fatigue, dizziness, and viral illness, all resolved within a week. Participants found the TERG program to be a positive experience with the equipment highly usable albeit with some need for individual tailoring to accommodate body shape and impairment. The inclusion of performance feedback and gamification was well received. Mean improvements in outcome measures were recorded across all domains with low to medium effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the feasibility of a holistic technology-based solution to the gap between stroke rehabilitation recommendations and provision. The results clearly demonstrate a rehabilitation program delivered through a TERG is feasible in terms of recruitment, retention, adherence, and user acceptability and may lead to considerable improvement in function, even in a chronic stroke population. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.820929.

[1]  M. Grealy,et al.  A Co-creation Centre for Accessible Rehabilitation Technology , 2022, Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.

[2]  P. Duncan,et al.  Telerehabilitation: Has Its Time Come? , 2021, Stroke.

[3]  T. Wijeratne,et al.  Feasibility and adherence to moderate intensity cardiovascular fitness training following stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial , 2021, BMC Neurology.

[4]  L. Ada,et al.  Treadmill walking improves walking speed and distance in ambulatory people after stroke and is not inferior to overground walking: a systematic review. , 2021, Journal of physiotherapy.

[5]  T. Vos,et al.  Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 , 2020, The Lancet.

[6]  S. Kiran,et al.  A Phase II Randomized, Virtual, Clinical Trial of Speech Therapy App for Speech, Language, and Cognitive Intervention in Stroke , 2020 .

[7]  S. Kuys,et al.  Dose and setting of rehabilitation received after stroke in Queensland, Australia: a prospective cohort study , 2020, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Barber,et al.  Exploration of barriers and enablers for evidence-based interventions for upper limb rehabilitation following a stroke: Use of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Robot Assisted Therapy in NHS Scotland , 2020 .

[9]  A. Kerr,et al.  Automated Movement Feedback for Recovering Independence in the Sit-to-Stand Movement in an Older Population: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Novel System , 2019, OBM Geriatrics.

[10]  L. Connell,et al.  Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists , 2019, BMJ Open.

[11]  P. Rowe,et al.  Treadmill training augmented with real-time visualisation feedback and function electrical stimulation for gait rehabilitation after stroke: a feasibility study , 2019, BMC biomedical engineering.

[12]  M. Grealy,et al.  Community cycling exercise for stroke survivors is feasible and acceptable , 2019, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[13]  T. Platz Evidence-Based Guidelines and Clinical Pathways in Stroke Rehabilitation—An International Perspective , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[14]  Jennifer L. Moore,et al.  A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults With Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation , 2018, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[15]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  S. Negrini,et al.  The World Health Organization "Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action". , 2017, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  Kristine K. Miller,et al.  Exercise after Stroke: Patient Adherence and Beliefs after Discharge from Rehabilitation , 2017, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[18]  M. Campbell,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[19]  C. Stinear Faculty Opinions recommendation of A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Ankle-Foot Cast on Walking Recovery Early After Stroke: SWIFT Cast Trial. , 2016 .

[20]  J. Baron,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Ankle-Foot Cast on Walking Recovery Early After Stroke , 2016, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Philip Sedgwick,et al.  Understanding the Hawthorne effect , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Lars Bäckman,et al.  A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[23]  D. Brooks,et al.  Integrating Aerobic Training Within Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study , 2014, Physical Therapy.

[24]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2014, The Lancet.

[25]  Kyler M Godwin,et al.  Serious Adverse Events Experienced by Survivors of Stroke in the First Year Following Discharge from Inpatient Rehabilitation , 2013, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[26]  C. Donnellan,et al.  Health professionals' adherence to stroke clinical guidelines: a review of the literature. , 2013, Health policy.

[27]  G. Mead,et al.  A Systematic Review of Perceived Barriers and Motivators to Physical Activity after Stroke , 2013, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[28]  E Diane Playford,et al.  Rehabilitation after stroke: summary of NICE guidance , 2013, BMJ.

[29]  O. Bang,et al.  Biomarkers for Stroke , 2013, Journal of stroke.

[30]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[32]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[33]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[36]  R. Popat,et al.  Stroke Impact Scale-16. A Brief Assessment of Physical Function , 2004 .

[37]  D. Wade,et al.  The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. , 1991, International disability studies.

[38]  Kim Delbaere,et al.  Adherence to Technology-Based Exercise Programs in Older Adults: A Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.