“Sensitivity to electricity” a new environmental epidemic

The human body constantly generates symptoms of various types from different organ systems. Mostly these symptoms are innocuous, but sometimes they are indicators of disease. These symptoms can be attributed to internal or external factors. The external factors thought to cause the symptoms can occur in the work environment or in the general environment of modern society. The impetus for this review of “sensitivity to electricity” is a recent and ongoing epidemic in Sweden. This epidemic will be described and analyzed against the background of current scientific work in the field, it will be placed in historical perspective, and strategies for managing it will be given. The first reports on this phenomenon appeared in Norway at the beginning of the 1980s (1-3). A number of employees at the Norwegian Telephone Company had recently started to use visual display units (VDUs), and they reported problems with their facial skin, problems which they believed to be caused by the VDUs. A considerable work-up was performed in Norway, but after the work environment had been adjusted, the problems subsided, and no definite cause of the skin symptoms was found. Subsequently, isolated reports on a few patients relating skin problems to work with VDUs have appeared from various parts of the world (4-6). In Sweden, however, this problem has grown to epidemic proportions. A search of current dataS. Liden

[1]  Anne E. Figert,et al.  From Paralysis to Fatigue: A History of Psychosomatic Illness in the Modern Era. , 1993 .

[2]  K. Hansson Mild,et al.  Low frequency MFs increased inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate levels in the Jurkat cell line , 1995, FEBS letters.

[3]  B. Arnetz,et al.  A cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from "electric hypersensitivity". Subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study. , 1996, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  Skin changes in patients claiming to suffer from “screen dermatitis”: a two‐case open‐field provocation study , 1994, Experimental dermatology.

[5]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Environmental illness. A controlled study of 26 subjects with '20th century disease'. , 1990, JAMA.

[6]  A Nonconventional Approach to the Treatment of “Environmental Illness” , 1995, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[7]  D. Ferguson,et al.  “RSI“: putting the epidemic to rest , 1987, The Medical journal of Australia.

[8]  W. Gowers,et al.  A Manual of Diseases of the Nervous System , 1887, Edinburgh Medical Journal.

[9]  W. Eaglstein,et al.  Terminal illness. , 1985, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  Facial skin complaints and work at visual display units. A histopathological study. , 1990, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[11]  K. H. Mild,et al.  CD45 phosphatase in Jurkat cells is necessary for response to applied ELF magnetic fields , 1995, FEBS letters.

[12]  O Axelson,et al.  Facial skin complaints and work at visual display units. An epidemiologic study of office employees. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  Skin problems in workers using visual display terminals A study of 201 patients , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  D. Stewart,et al.  Psychiatric assessment of patients with "20th-century disease" ("total allergy syndrome"). , 1985, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  A Nilsen,et al.  Facial rash in visual display unit operators , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  V Lindén,et al.  Video computer terminals and occupational dermatitis. , 1981, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  G Swanbeck,et al.  Skin problems from visual display units. Provocation of skin symptoms under experimental conditions. , 1989, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[19]  C. Göthe,et al.  The environmental somatization syndrome. , 1995, Psychosomatics.

[20]  K. H. Mild,et al.  Intracellular calcium oscillations in a T-cell line after exposure to extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields with variable frequencies and flux densities. , 1995, Bioelectromagnetics.

[21]  P Eneroth,et al.  Techno-stress. A psychophysiological study of employees with VDU-associated skin complaints. , 1992, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[22]  U Bergqvist,et al.  Skin symptoms and disease during work with visual display terminals , 1994, Contact dermatitis.