To help inform a conference organised by the Germany Ministry of Health (BMG) and the OECD on ‘Managing Hospital Volumes’ on the 11th April 2013, the OECD Secretariat produced this paper giving an international perspective on Germany’s situation and the current policy debate. It provides a number of observations about the structure and financing of hospitals in Germany. It begins by arguing that Germany has a more open-ended approach to the financing of hospital services and weaker controls over the hospital budget than in many other OECD countries. In large part this reflects that DRGs in Germany are almost strictly used for pricing, whereas other countries use DRGs as one of many tools they have to influence hospital budgets. This is compounded by a situation where State governments do not have an incentive to rationalise hospital capacity where this may be desirable. Finally, the paper argues that the vast array of quality information available in Germany ought to be used to better direct financing. Afin d’apporter des informations a l’appui de la conference organisee le 11 avril 2013 par le ministere allemand de la Sante (BMG) et l’OCDE sur le theme de la « Gestion des volumes d’activite des hopitaux », le Secretariat de l’OCDE a elabore ce document, qui permet d’aborder la situation de l’Allemagne et le debat en cours selon une perspective internationale. Ce texte livre un certain nombre d’observations concernant la structure et le financement des hopitaux allemands. Il montre dans un premier temps que l’Allemagne a du financement des services hospitaliers une approche plus ouverte que de nombreux autres pays de l’OCDE, et que le budget des hopitaux y est plus faiblement controle. Cela tient en grande partie au fait que la tarification des services hospitaliers repose en Allemagne presque exclusivement sur les groupes homogenes de malades (GHM), alors que d’autres pays s’en servent plutot – avec un grand nombre d’autres outils – pour controler le budget des hopitaux. Cette situation est renforcee par le fait que les autorites des Lander ne sont pas incitees a rationaliser la capacite du secteur hospitalier, alors que cela pourrait etre souhaitable. Enfin, le document fait valoir que les nombreuses informations disponibles en Allemagne sur la qualite des soins devraient contribuer a une meilleure affectation des financements.
[1]
F. Cots,et al.
Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?
,
2013,
BMJ.
[2]
Klim McPherson,et al.
International Variations in a Selected Number of Surgical Procedures
,
2013
.
[3]
E. Stuart,et al.
The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.
,
2011,
Health affairs.
[4]
Valérie Paris,et al.
HEALTH SYSTEMS INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS: A SURVEY OF 29 OECD COUNTRIES
,
2010
.
[5]
Reinhard Busse,et al.
Measuring, monitoring, and managing quality in Germany's hospitals.
,
2009,
Health affairs.
[6]
P. Zurn,et al.
International Mobility of Health Professionals and Health Workforce Management in Canada: Myths and Realities
,
2008
.
[7]
J. Buchan,et al.
Migration of Health Workers: The UK Perspective to 2006
,
2008
.
[8]
L. Aiken,et al.
Nurse Workforce Challenges in the United States: Implications for Policy
,
2008
.
[9]
H. Nolting.
Healthcare Fact Check Regional Variations in German Healthcare
,
2012
.
[10]
Janice S. Pedersen,et al.
How Health Systems Make Available Information on Service Providers: Experience in Seven Countries.
,
2011,
Rand health quarterly.