A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone.

Screw-shaped implants made from rods of commercially pure titanium (grade 1) and titanium-aluminum-vanadium (grade 5) were machined, and the implant surface structures were numerically described before being placed in rabbit tibiae for healing periods of 1 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Quantitative comparisons of the removal torque (Ncm) necessary to loosen the implants from the bone bed were performed. Short-term (1 month) observations revealed no significant differences between the two tested materials. However, after 6 and 12 months, the commercially pure titanium implants were significantly more stable in the bone bed, as compared to the alloy samples. After 6 months, the commercially pure titanium had a mean removal torque of 29 Ncm versus 23 for the alloy (P = .01), and after 12 months, the mean removal torque was 38 Ncm for commercially pure titanium as compared to 35 Ncm for the alloy (P = .01). Quantifications of the bone tissue response to the materials did not show any significant differences; however, the commercially pure titanium showed a tendency to have a higher percentage of bone in contact with the implant as compared to the alloy screws. Bone volumes in the threads were similar. The absence of any quantitative light microscopic difference after 1 month following placement may relate to the fact that there was a sparse amount of bone, since the tissue was in the organization/granulation phase. After 6 and 12 months of follow-up, substantial bone formation had occurred, resulting in significantly increased removal torques for the commercially pure titanium samples.

[1]  H. Frost.  The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part II. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  A. Wennerberg.  On surface roughness and implant incorporation , 1996 .

[3]  N. Blumenthal,et al.  Inhibition of apatite formation by titanium and vanadium ions. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  D. Howie,et al.  The differences in toxicity and release of bone-resorbing mediators induced by titanium and cobalt-chromium-alloy wear particles. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  D. Smith,et al.  A prospective clinical study in humans of an endosseous dental implant partially covered with a powder-sintered porous coating: 3- to 4-year results. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Preliminary experimental results on mapping of the elemental distribution of the organic tissues surrounding titanium-alloy implants , 1996 .

[8]  D. Puleo,et al.  Ti-6Al-4V ion solution inhibition of osteogenic cell phenotype as a function of differentiation timecourse in vitro. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[9]  L Sennerby,et al.  A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  J. Malmqvist,et al.  Clinical report on the success of 47 consecutively placed Core-Vent implants followed from 3 months to 4 years. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  H. Frost,et al.  The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  E. Evans.  Cell damage in vitro following direct contact with fine particles of titanium, titanium alloy and cobalt-chrome-molybdenum alloy. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[13]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of Screw Vent implants versus Brånemark fixtures, installed in a periodontal clinic. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  D. Puleo,et al.  Effects of sublethal metal ion concentrations on osteogenic cells derived from bone marrow stromal cells. , 1995, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[15]  D. Williams,et al.  In-vitro corrosion and wear of titanium alloys in the biological environment. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[16]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.