Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries' health outcomes.

CONTEXT Despite a widespread interest in increasing the numbers of primary care physicians to improve care and to moderate costs, the relationship of the primary care physician workforce to patient-level outcomes remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To measure the association between the adult primary care physician workforce and individual patient outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional analysis of the outcomes of a 2007 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older (N = 5,132,936), which used 2 measures of adult primary care physicians (general internists and family physicians) across Primary Care Service Areas (N = 6542): (1) American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile nonfederal, office-based physicians per total population and (2) office-based primary care clinical full-time equivalents (FTEs) per Medicare beneficiary derived from Medicare claims. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual individual-level outcomes (mortality, ambulatory care sensitive condition [ACSC] hospitalizations, and Medicare program spending), adjusted for individual patient characteristics and geographic area variables. RESULTS Marked variation was observed in the primary care physician workforce across areas, but low correlation was observed between the 2 primary care workforce measures (Spearman r = 0.056; P < .001). Compared with areas with the lowest quintile of primary care physician measure using AMA Masterfile counts, beneficiaries in the highest quintile had fewer ACSC hospitalizations (74.90 vs 79.61 per 1000 beneficiaries; relative rate [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.95), lower mortality (5.38 vs 5.47 per 100 beneficiaries; RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.997), and no significant difference in total Medicare spending ($8722 vs $8765 per beneficiary; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00). Beneficiaries residing in areas with the highest quintile of primary care clinician FTEs compared with those in the lowest quintile had lower mortality (5.19 vs 5.49 per 100 beneficiaries; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), fewer ACSC hospitalizations (72.53 vs 79.48 per 1000 beneficiaries; RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92), and higher overall Medicare spending ($8857 vs $8769 per beneficiary; RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.004-1.02). CONCLUSION A higher level of primary care physician workforce, particularly with an FTE measure that may more accurately reflect ambulatory primary care, was generally associated with favorable patient outcomes.

[1]  A E Crowley,et al.  Graduate medical education. , 1986, JAMA.

[2]  K. Grumbach,et al.  The challenge of defining and counting generalist physicians: an analysis of Physician Masterfile data. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[3]  H. Krakauer,et al.  Physician impact on hospital admission and on mortality rates in the Medicare population. , 1996, Health services research.

[4]  E. Fisher,et al.  Benchmarking the US physician workforce. An alternative to needs-based or demand-based planning. , 1996, JAMA.

[5]  J. Zwanziger,et al.  Variations in primary care physician referral rates. , 1999, Health services research.

[6]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  T. Stukel,et al.  Primary care service areas: a new tool for the evaluation of primary care services. , 2003, Health services research.

[8]  J. Billings.  Using Administrative Data to Monitor Access, Identify Disparities, and Assess Performance of the Safety Net , 2003 .

[9]  B. Starfield,et al.  The relationship between primary care, income inequality, and mortality in US States, 1980-1995. , 2003, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[10]  Elliott S Fisher,et al.  Health Care Quality, Geographic Variations, and the Challenge of Supply-Sensitive Care , 2003, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[11]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  R. Phillips,et al.  Why does a U.S. primary care physician workforce crisis matter? , 2003, American family physician.

[13]  J. Skinner,et al.  Use of hospitals, physician visits, and hospice care during last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  B. Starfield,et al.  Primary care, race, and mortality in US states. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[15]  B. Starfield,et al.  The effects of specialist supply on populations' health: assessing the evidence. , 2005, Health affairs.

[16]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[17]  S. Laditka,et al.  More may be better: evidence of a negative relationship between physician supply and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. , 2005, Health services research.

[18]  T. Stukel,et al.  End-of-life care at academic medical centers: implications for future workforce requirements. , 2006, Health affairs.

[19]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Mortality and physician supply: does region hold the key to the paradox? , 2007, Health services research.

[20]  Kerri L. Rivers,et al.  US residency training before and after the 1997 Balanced Budget Act. , 2008, JAMA.

[21]  R. Kruse,et al.  Will generalist physician supply meet demands of an increasing and aging population? , 2008, Health affairs.

[22]  John E. Wennberg,et al.  Tracking the Care of Patients with Severe Chronic Illness: The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 2008 , 2008 .

[23]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  The political economy of U.S. primary care. , 2009, Health affairs.

[24]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Would having more primary care doctors cut health spending growth? , 2009, Health affairs.

[25]  Stephen M Shortell,et al.  Primary care and accountable care--two essential elements of delivery-system reform. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Stephen M Shortell,et al.  The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? , 2009, JAMA.

[27]  R. Steinbrook.  Easing the shortage in adult primary care--is it all about money? , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  W. Rosser,et al.  Patient-centered medical homes in Ontario. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  T. Stukel,et al.  Primary Care Physician Supply and Children's Health Care Use, Access, and Outcomes: Findings From Canada , 2010, Pediatrics.

[30]  E. Fisher.  Regional and Racial Variation in Primary Care and the Quality of Care among Medicare Beneficiaries , 2010 .

[31]  J. Skinner,et al.  Prices don't drive regional Medicare spending variations. , 2010, Health affairs.

[32]  Hoangmai H Pham,et al.  Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. , 2010, Health affairs.