Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval

Recognition memory is usually regarded as a judgment based on trace strength or familiarity. But recognition may also be accomplished by constraining retrieval so that only sought after information comes to mind (source-constrained retrieval). We introduce amemory-for-foils paradigm that provides evidence for source-constrained retrieval in recognition memory (Experiment 1) and source memory (Experiment 2). In this paradigm, subjects studied words under deep or shallow encoding conditions and were given a memory test (recognition or source) that required them to discriminate between new items (foils) and either deep or shallow targets. A final recognition test was used to examine memory for the foils. In both experiments, foil memory was superior when subjects attempted to retrieve deep rather than shallow targets on the earlier test. These findings support a sourceconstrained retrieval view of cognitive control by demonstrating qualitative differences in the basis for memory performance.

[1]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Sustained and Transient Processing Components Engaged during Controlled Retrieval , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Strategy-dependent changes in memory: Effects on behavior and brain activity , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[4]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[5]  Claire S. Birch,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for the Modulation of Retrieval Orientation by Depth of Study Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. , 1996 .

[7]  N. Raz,et al.  Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[8]  R. Marsh,et al.  Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes , 1998 .

[9]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[11]  M. Humphreys,et al.  What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Age Differences in Depth of Retrieval: Memory for Foils. , 2005 .

[13]  P W Burgess,et al.  Confabulation and the control of recollection. , 1996, Memory.

[14]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  L. Jacoby,et al.  The role of cognitive control: Early selection versus late correction. , 1999 .