Development of Low-Cost, Energy-Absorbing Bridge Rail

A new, low-cost bridge railing was designed to be compatible with the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS). The barrier system was configured to reduce bridge deck width and its associated cost. Several concepts for an energy-absorbing bridge post were developed and tested; the concepts included strong-post designs with plastic hinges and weak-post designs with bending near the bridge deck attachment. The final railing concept incorporated S3 × 5.7 (S76 × 8.5) steel posts housed in a tubular bracket placed at the outside vertical edge of the deck and anchored to its top and bottom with one through-deck bolt. The W-beam rail section was attached to the posts with a bolt that was designed to fracture during an impact event. Two full-scale crash tests were performed in accordance with the Test Level 3 impact conditions provided in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. The bridge rail system met all safety performance criteria for both the small car and pickup truck crash tests. Barrier VII computer simulations, in combination with the full-scale crash testing programs for the bridge railing and MGS, demonstrated that a special-approach guardrail transition was unnecessary.

[1]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Midwest Guardrail System for Long-Span Culvert Applications , 2007 .

[2]  R L Stoughton,et al.  VEHICLE IMPACT TESTS OF A SEE-THROUGH, COLLAPSING RING, STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBE, BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING. FINAL REPORT , 1983 .

[3]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[4]  B G Pfeifer,et al.  SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A NESTED W-BEAM WITH HALF-POST SPACING OVER A LOW-FILL CULVERT , 1993 .

[5]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Evaluation of Critical Flare Rates for the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) , 2008 .

[6]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Performance of Steel-Post, W-Beam Guardrail Systems , 2007 .

[7]  R A Zimmer,et al.  RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY FEATURES , 1993 .

[8]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Development of a TL-5 Vertical Faced Concrete Median Barrier Incorporating Head Ejection Criteria , 2007 .

[9]  J D Michie,et al.  Multiple-service-level highway bridge railing selection procedures , 1981 .

[10]  Don L Ivey,et al.  Safer bridge railings: volume 1 - summary report , 1984 .

[11]  J D Michie,et al.  RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY APPURTENANCES , 1981 .

[12]  Wanda L Menges,et al.  NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-10 on the Modified PennDOT Type 2 Guide Rail. Test 4 , 2000 .

[13]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Development of the Midwest Guardrail System , 2002 .

[14]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  NCHRP REPORT 350 TEST 3-11 OF THE TEXAS TYPE T6 BRIDGE RAIL , 1998 .

[15]  Chuck A. Plaxico,et al.  Evaluation and Design of ODOT's Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup , 2006 .

[16]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-11 of the Modified T8 Bridge Rail , 2009 .

[17]  G H Powell.  COMPUTER EVALUATION OF AUTOMOBILE BARRIER SYSTEMS , 1970 .

[18]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Development of the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) W-Beam to Thrie-Beam Transition Element , 2007 .

[19]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  NCHRP 350 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF A GUARDRAIL CONNECTION TO LOW-FILL CULVERTS , 2002 .

[20]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME XI: APPENDIX J - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING GUARDRAIL SYSTEMS , 1990 .

[21]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  EVALUATION OF ROADSIDE SAFETY DEVICES USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[22]  Chuck A. Plaxico,et al.  Improvements to the Weak-Post W-Beam Guardrail , 2001 .

[23]  Wanda L Menges,et al.  TESTING OF NEW BRIDGE RAIL AND TRANSITION DESIGNS. VOLUME I: TECHNICAL REPORT , 1997 .

[24]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Midwest Guardrail System for Standard and Special Applications , 2004 .

[25]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM – UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO. 3-11 WITH 28" C.G. HEIGHT (2214MG-2) , 2006 .

[26]  R L Stoughton,et al.  VEHICLE CRASH TESTS OF STEEL BRIDGE BARRIER RAIL SYSTEMS FOR USE ON SECONDARY HIGHWAYS. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[27]  Carl M Ochoa.  GMS Guardrail Mini Spacer Releasable Fastener: Improving Performance and Reliability of Conventional Strong-Post Guardrail , 2008 .

[28]  G H Powell.  BARRIER VII: A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR EVALUATION OF AUTOMOBILE BARRIER SYSTEMS , 1973 .

[29]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  Analysis of a Flexible Bridge Rail System for High-Speed Roadways , 2008 .

[30]  Eric F Nordlin,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTS OF THE CALIFORNIA TYPE 15 BRIDGE BARRIER RAIL SERIES XXV , 1971 .