Flight Crew Collaboration to Manage Safety Risks

This study suggests that goal interdependence is a useful theoretical framework to understand collaboration as crew members cope with safety hazards. Thirty-five pilots, first officers, second officers, and flight attendants provided critical incidents of safety problems handled effectively and ineffectively. Analyses indicate that cooperative goals and the constructive discussion of opposing views were powerful antecedents to using safe procedures expeditiously. The study introduces the critical incident method to the study of flight crew management. Results identify training to assist crew members to maintain the margin of safety in the skies.

[1]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[2]  M. Deutsch A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[3]  Captain H. C. Alger Cockpit resource management. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  The conflict-positive organization : stimulate diversity and create unity , 1990 .

[5]  H. Foushee,et al.  Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance , 1984 .

[6]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations , 1986 .

[7]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Implications of Controversy Research for Management , 1985 .

[8]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Interdependence and Interpersonal Attraction Among Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Individuals: A Theoretical Formulation and a Meta-analysis of the Research , 1983 .

[9]  D. Tjosvold Organizational test of goal linkage theory , 1986 .

[10]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making. , 1982 .

[11]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Team Organization: An Enduring Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[12]  D. Tjosvold Working Together to Get Things Done: Managing for Organizational Productivity , 1988 .

[13]  M. Nicholson The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[14]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .

[15]  T. Oyama,et al.  Experimental studies on figural aftereffects in Japan. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[17]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Cockpit Management Attitudes , 1984, Human factors.

[18]  C. E. Billings,et al.  Information transfer problems in the aviation system , 1981 .

[19]  D. Funder,et al.  Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[21]  Paul E. Spector Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[22]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[23]  H. P. Smith,et al.  A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions , 1979 .

[24]  M. D. White,et al.  Resource management on the flight deck. [conferences , 1980 .