What reaches the antenna? How to calibrate odor flux and ligand-receptor affinities.

Physiological studies on olfaction frequently ignore the airborne quantities of stimuli reaching the sensory organ. We used a gas chromatography-calibrated photoionization detector to estimate quantities released from standard Pasteur pipette stimulus cartridges during repeated puffing of 27 compounds and verified how lack of quantification could obscure olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) affinities. Chemical structure of the stimulus, solvent, dose, storage condition, puff interval, and puff number all influenced airborne quantities. A model including boiling point and lipophilicity, but excluding vapor pressure, predicted airborne quantities from stimuli in paraffin oil on filter paper. We recorded OSN responses of Drosophila melanogaster, Ips typographus, and Culex quinquefasciatus, to known quantities of airborne stimuli. These demonstrate that inferred OSN tuning width, ligand affinity, and classification can be confounded and require stimulus quantification. Additionally, proper dose-response analysis shows that Drosophila AB3A OSNs are not promiscuous, but highly specific for ethyl hexanoate, with other earlier proposed ligands 10- to 10 000-fold less potent. Finally, we reanalyzed published Drosophila OSN data (DoOR) and demonstrate substantial shifts in affinities after compensation for quantity and puff number. We conclude that consistent experimental protocols are necessary for correct OSN classification and present some simple rules that make calibration, even retroactively, readily possible.

[1]  B. Hansson,et al.  Functional classification and central nervous projections of olfactory receptor neurons housed in antennal trichoid sensilla of female yellow fever mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Chapman,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of olfaction in the whip spider Phrynus parvulus (Arachnida, Amblypygi). , 2000, Journal of insect physiology.

[3]  B. Hansson,et al.  Olfactory receptor neurons detecting plant odours and male volatiles in Anomala cuprea beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). , 2001, Journal of insect physiology.

[4]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Coding of Odors by a Receptor Repertoire , 2006, Cell.

[5]  J. L. Todd,et al.  Neurons discovered in male Helicoverpa zea antennae that correlate with pheromone-mediated attraction and interspecific antagonism , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  C Giovanni Galizia,et al.  Temporal integrity of an airborne odor stimulus is greatly affected by physical aspects of the odor delivery system. , 2006, Chemical senses.

[7]  Andrew S. French,et al.  Dynamic properties of Drosophila olfactory electroantennograms , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  Martin Strauch,et al.  Integrating Heterogeneous Odor Response Data into a Common Response Model: A DoOR to the Complete Olfactome , 2010, Chemical senses.

[9]  A. S. French,et al.  A new method for wide frequency range dynamic olfactory stimulation and characterization. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[10]  M. M. Sadek,et al.  Attraction Modulated by Spacing of Pheromone Components and Anti-attractants in a Bark Beetle and a Moth , 2011, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[11]  John Murlis,et al.  Measurement of Odor-Plume Structure in a Wind Tunnel Using a Photoionization Detector and a Tracer Gas , 2002 .

[12]  Jeffrey A. Riffell,et al.  Physical Processes and Real-Time Chemical Measurement of the Insect Olfactory Environment , 2008, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[13]  Noam Sobel,et al.  Rapid olfactory processing implicates subcortical control of an olfactomotor system. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Knaden,et al.  A novel multicomponent stimulus device for use in olfactory experiments , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  A. Blejec,et al.  A General Odorant Background Affects the Coding of Pheromone Stimulus Intermittency in Specialist Olfactory Receptor Neurones , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  B. Hansson,et al.  Characterization of antennal trichoid sensilla from female southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus Say. , 2008, Chemical senses.

[17]  Martin N. Andersson,et al.  Specificity and redundancy in the olfactory system of the bark beetle Ips typographus: single-cell responses to ecologically relevant odors. , 2009, Journal of insect physiology.

[18]  A. S. French,et al.  Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Bill S. Hansson,et al.  Olfactory Shifts Parallel Superspecialism for Toxic Fruit in Drosophila melanogaster Sibling, D. sechellia , 2006, Current Biology.

[20]  Zainulabeuddin Syed,et al.  Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Responses of three antennal specialist neurons of male Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) to sex pheromone components at and above naturally emitted levels , 1993 .

[22]  B. Hansson,et al.  Field Attractants for Pachnoda interrupta Selected by Means of GC-EAD and Single Sensillum Screening , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[23]  Electroantennogram responses of mediterranean fruit fly,Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) to trimedlure and itstrans isomers , 1989, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[24]  T. Baker,et al.  Host plant volatiles synergize responses of sex pheromone-specific olfactory receptor neurons in male Helicoverpa zea , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  B. Hansson,et al.  Evolution of the olfactory code in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  C Giovanni Galizia,et al.  The molecular receptive range of an olfactory receptor in vivo (Drosophila melanogaster Or22a). , 2006, Journal of neurobiology.

[27]  E. Brockerhoff,et al.  Correction for Differences in Volatility Among Olfactory Stimuli and Effect on EAG Responses of Dioryctria abietivorella to Plant Volatiles , 1999, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[28]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Odourant reception in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae , 2010, Nature.

[29]  R. M. Costanzo,et al.  Detection thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol using serial dilutions in different solvents. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[30]  E. Hartlieb,et al.  Behavioral response of femaleHelicoverpa (Heliothis)armigera HB. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moths to synthetic pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) kairomone , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[31]  William S Cain,et al.  Quantification of chemical vapors in chemosensory research. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[32]  M. Geier,et al.  Carbon dioxide instantly sensitizes female yellow fever mosquitoes to human skin odours , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  T. Baker,et al.  Response of single antennal neurons of female cabbage loopers to behaviorally active attractants , 1993, Naturwissenschaften.

[34]  T. Liljefors,et al.  Structure-activity relationships for chain-shortened analogs of (Z)-5-decenyl acetate, a pheromone component of the turnip moth,Agrotis segetum , 1990, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[35]  B. Kalinová,et al.  Structure-activity correlations among analogs of the currant clearwing moth pheromone , 1993, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[36]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Sensitivities of antennal olfactory neurons of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, to carboxylic acids. , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.