Valuation of Metro Crowding Considering Heterogeneity of Route Choice Behaviors

More than seven million people rely on the metro system daily in Seoul, South Korea. The metro system plays a vital role in connecting passengers to desired locations with the advantage of allowing for travel reliability and relative safety, all the while being an environmentally friendly alternative to other transport systems. Despite the benefits mentioned above, crowding on the metro can contribute significantly to deterioration of the individual’s travel experience and necessitates its proper evaluation, so that user experience may be improved. To achieve this, this study quantifies the level of crowding by deriving estimates for route choice models with crowding as one of the main attributes for metro passenger decisions. The data used in the model are obtained through a stated preference survey, which was conducted at five major transfer stations in Seoul to estimate factors such as travel time, transfers, travel cost, and crowding level. These attributes are then analyzed using homogeneity and heterogeneity models of different trip purposes. Furthermore, crowding multipliers (CMs) for Seoul are estimated and compared with those of other cities around the world. Estimation results pinpoint crowding as one of the main factors in route choice for passengers for all types of trips, with multiplier values reaching the highest of all cities around the world for sitting CM and standing CM at 2.15 and 3.22, respectively. Our results indicate that Seoul metro passengers are more sensitive to crowding than any of the passengers analyzed in 18 major city metros around the world.

[1]  S. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport , 2003 .

[2]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Willingness-to-Pay Estimation with Mixed Logit Models: Some New Evidence , 2005 .

[3]  Tom Cox,et al.  Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain , 2006 .

[4]  N Douglas,et al.  Estimating the passenger cost of train overcrowding , 2006 .

[5]  Rene Altrov Kultuuri mõju eestlaste ja leedulaste ruumikasutusele , 2007 .

[6]  K. Willis,et al.  Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments , 2007 .

[7]  R. Wener,et al.  Crowding and personal space invasion on the train: Please don’t make me sit in the middle , 2007 .

[8]  G. Whelan,et al.  An Investigation of the Willingness to Pay to Reduce Rail Overcrowding , 2009 .

[9]  Joon-Ki Kim,et al.  Passenger Choice Models for Analysis of Impacts of Real-Time Bus Information on Crowdedness , 2009 .

[10]  Yung-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Exploring passenger anxiety associated with train travel , 2010 .

[11]  Tom Cox,et al.  Modelling the spillover effects of rail passenger crowding on individual well-being and organisational behaviour , 2011 .

[12]  John M. Rose,et al.  Identifying commuter preferences for existing modes and a proposed Metro in Sydney, Australia with special reference to crowding , 2011, Public Transp..

[13]  M. Wardman,et al.  Twenty Years of Rail Crowding Valuation Studies: Evidence and Lessons from British Experience , 2011 .

[14]  John M. Rose,et al.  Crowding in public transport systems: Effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand , 2013 .

[15]  M. Kouwenhoven,et al.  Value of Crowding on Public Transport in île-de-France, France , 2014 .

[16]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice , 2014 .

[17]  Gunilla Björklund,et al.  Valuing in-vehicle comfort and crowding reduction in public transport , 2015 .

[18]  Ramiro Alberto Ríos,et al.  Use of Mixed Stated and Revealed Preference Data for Crowding Valuation on Public Transport in Santiago, Chile , 2015 .

[19]  Ramiro Alberto Ríos,et al.  Valuing Crowding In Public Transport Systems Using Mixed Stated/Revealed Preferences Data: The Case Of Santiago , 2015 .

[20]  Huiying Wen,et al.  Public Transport Crowding Valuation: Evidence from College Students in Guangzhou , 2016 .

[21]  Alejandro Tirachini,et al.  Valuation of sitting and standing in metro trains using revealed preferences , 2016 .

[22]  Dong‐Kyu Kim,et al.  Valuation of Travel Time Reliability Accommodating Heterogeneity of Route Choice Behaviors , 2016 .

[23]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[24]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Estimation of crowding discomfort in public transport: Results from Santiago de Chile , 2017 .

[25]  M. Koning,et al.  Crowding in Public Transport: Who Cares and Why? , 2015 .

[26]  Peilin Li,et al.  Travel satisfaction inequality and the role of the urban metro system , 2019, Transport Policy.

[27]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Flexible Estimates of Heterogeneity in Crowding Valuation in the New York City Subway , 2019, Journal of Choice Modelling.