LeWoS: A universal leaf‐wood classification method to facilitate the 3D modelling of large tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR

Leaf‐wood separation in terrestrial LiDAR data is a prerequisite for non‐destructively estimating biophysical forest properties such as standing wood volumes and leaf area distributions. Current methods have not been extensively applied and tested on tropical trees. Moreover, their impacts on the accuracy of subsequent wood volume retrieval were rarely explored. We present LeWoS, a new fully automatic tool to automate the separation of leaf and wood components, based only on geometric information at both the plot and individual tree scales. This data‐driven method utilizes recursive point cloud segmentation and regularization procedures. Only one parameter is required, which makes our method easily and universally applicable to data from any LiDAR technology and forest type. We conducted a twofold evaluation of the LeWoS method on an extensive dataset of 61 tropical trees. We first assessed the point‐wise classification accuracy, yielding a score of 0.91 ± 0.03 in average. Second, we evaluated the impact of the proposed method on 3D tree models by cross‐comparing estimates in wood volume and branch length with those based on manually separated wood points. This comparison showed similar results, with relative biases of less than 9% and 21% on volume and length respectively. LeWoS allows an automated processing chain for non‐destructive tree volume and biomass estimation when coupled with 3D modelling methods. The average processing time on a laptop was 90s for 1 million points. We provide LeWoS as an open‐source tool with an end‐user interface, together with a large dataset of labelled 3D point clouds from contrasting forest structures. This study closes the gap for stand volume modelling in tropical forests where leaf and wood separation remain a crucial challenge.

[1]  Donald Geman,et al.  Constrained Restoration and the Recovery of Discontinuities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Rolf Adams,et al.  Seeded Region Growing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  A min-max cut algorithm for graph partitioning and data clustering , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[4]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Min-Cut/Max-Flow Algorithms for Energy Minimization in Vision , 2004, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  An experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE TREES FROM TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER DATA , 2004 .

[7]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .

[8]  Dirk Wollherr,et al.  A clustering method for efficient segmentation of 3D laser data , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Analysis of the backscattered energy in terrestrial laser scanning data , 2008 .

[10]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  Remote Sensing Radiometric Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners with External Reference Targets , 2022 .

[11]  Edwin Olson,et al.  Graph-based segmentation for colored 3D laser point clouds , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  M. Fournier,et al.  The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[13]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Fast Automatic Precision Tree Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  Change Detection of Tree Biomass with Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Quantitative Structure Modelling , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[15]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  On seeing the wood from the leaves and the role of voxel size in determining leaf area distribution of forests with terrestrial LiDAR , 2014 .

[16]  P. Raumonen,et al.  Massive-Scale Tree Modelling from Tls Data , 2015 .

[17]  M. Herold,et al.  Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[18]  H. Spiecker,et al.  Non Destructive Method for Biomass Prediction Combining TLS Derived Tree Volume and Wood Density , 2015 .

[19]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[20]  Heinrich Spiecker,et al.  SimpleTree —An Efficient Open Source Tool to Build Tree Models from TLS Clouds , 2015 .

[21]  Q. Guo,et al.  A geometric method for wood-leaf separation using terrestrial and simulated Lidar data , 2015 .

[22]  Markku Åkerblom,et al.  Analysis of Geometric Primitives in Quantitative Structure Models of Tree Stems , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Guang Zheng,et al.  Improved Salient Feature-Based Approach for Automatically Separating Photosynthetic and Nonphotosynthetic Components Within Terrestrial Lidar Point Cloud Data of Forest Canopies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  E. Casella,et al.  Segmentation of tree seedling point clouds into elementary units , 2016 .

[25]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[26]  Lin Cao,et al.  A Novel Approach for Retrieving Tree Leaf Area from Ground-Based LiDAR , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Di Wang,et al.  Automatic and Self-Adaptive Stem Reconstruction in Landslide-Affected Forests , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[28]  Jasmine Muir,et al.  Evaluation of the Range Accuracy and the Radiometric Calibration of Multiple Terrestrial Laser Scanning Instruments for Data Interoperability , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  M. Herold,et al.  Estimation of above‐ground biomass of large tropical trees with terrestrial LiDAR , 2017 .

[30]  M. Herold,et al.  Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots , 2017 .

[31]  C. Mallet,et al.  A structured regularization framework for spatially smoothing semantic labelings of 3D point clouds , 2017 .

[32]  J. Trochta,et al.  3D Forest: An application for descriptions of three-dimensional forest structures using terrestrial LiDAR , 2017, PloS one.

[33]  Di Wang,et al.  FEASIBILITY OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR SEPARATING WOOD ANDLEAF POINTS FROM TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING DATA , 2017 .

[34]  Loic Landrieu,et al.  WEAKLY SUPERVISED SEGMENTATION-AIDED CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN SCENES FROM 3D LIDAR POINT CLOUDS , 2017 .

[35]  Ze He,et al.  Estimating Leaf Area Density of Individual Trees Using the Point Cloud Segmentation of Terrestrial LiDAR Data and a Voxel-Based Model , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[36]  N. Barbier,et al.  Using terrestrial laser scanning data to estimate large tropical trees biomass and calibrate allometric models: A comparison with traditional destructive approach , 2017 .

[37]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Separating Tree Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Components from Point Cloud Data Using Dynamic Segment Merging , 2018 .

[38]  M. Herold,et al.  Quantifying branch architecture of tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR and 3D modelling , 2018, Trees.

[39]  Crystal Schaaf,et al.  Quality Assessment of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Ecosystem Observations Using Pulse Trajectories , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  M I Disney,et al.  Weighing trees with lasers: advances, challenges and opportunities , 2018, Interface Focus.

[41]  Tanja Tarvainen,et al.  Segmentation of vessel structures from photoacoustic images with reliability assessment. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[42]  Xi Zhu,et al.  Foliar and woody materials discriminated using terrestrial LiDAR in a mixed natural forest , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[43]  Wei Gong,et al.  Hyperspectral lidar point cloud segmentation based on geometric and spectral information. , 2019, Optics express.

[44]  M. Disney,et al.  Leaf and wood classification framework for terrestrial LiDAR point clouds , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[45]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Improving LiDAR classification accuracy by contextual label smoothing in post-processing , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[46]  M. Disney Terrestrial LiDAR: a three-dimensional revolution in how we look at trees. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[47]  Hugo Ledoux,et al.  AdTree: Accurate, Detailed, and Automatic Modelling of Laser-Scanned Trees , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[48]  M. Herold,et al.  Tree Biomass Equations from Terrestrial LiDAR: A Case Study in Guyana , 2019, Forests.

[49]  Davide Poggiali,et al.  Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization , 2019, Wellcome open research.

[50]  Junjie Zhou,et al.  Separating Leaf and Wood Points in Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data Using Multiple Optimal Scales , 2019, Sensors.

[51]  J. Pisek,et al.  New estimates of leaf angle distribution from terrestrial LiDAR: Comparison with measured and modelled estimates from nine broadleaf tree species , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[52]  Matheus Boni Vicari On leaf and wood separation from Terrestrial LiDAR data , 2019 .

[53]  Kim Calders,et al.  Improved Supervised Learning-Based Approach for Leaf and Wood Classification From LiDAR Point Clouds of Forests , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.