Structural behaviour and strain distribution of the long bones of the human lower limbs.

Although stiffness and strength of lower limb bones have been investigated in the past, information is not complete. While the femur has been extensively investigated, little information is available about the strain distribution in the tibia, and the fibula has not been tested in vitro. This study aimed at improving the understanding of the biomechanics of lower limb bones by: (i) measuring the stiffness and strain distributions of the different low limb bones; (ii) assessing the effect of viscoelasticity in whole bones within a physiological range of strain-rates; (iii) assessing the difference in the behaviour in relation to opposite directions of bending and torsion. The structural stiffness and strain distribution of paired femurs, tibias and fibulas from two donors were measured. Each region investigated of each bone was instrumented with 8-16 triaxial strain gauges (over 600 grids in total). Each bone was subjected to 6-12 different loading configurations. Tests were replicated at two different loading speeds covering the physiological range of strain-rates. Viscoelasticity did not have any pronounced effect on the structural stiffness and strain distribution, in the physiological range of loading rates explored in this study. The stiffness and strain distribution varied greatly between bone segments, but also between directions of loading. Different stiffness and strain distributions were observed when opposite directions of torque or opposite directions of bending (in the same plane) were applied. To our knowledge, this study represents the most extensive collection of whole-bone biomechanical properties of lower limb bones.

[1]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Comparison of three standard anatomical reference frames for the tibia-fibula complex. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  L Cristofolini,et al.  A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. , 1997, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[3]  M. Markel,et al.  Mechanical properties of long bones in dogs. , 1994, American journal of veterinary research.

[4]  Jamshid Tehranzadeh,et al.  Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  F. G. Evans,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone. , 1969, Artificial limbs.

[6]  Y. Fung,et al.  Bone and Cartilage , 1993 .

[7]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  The effects of embalming using a 4% formalin solution on the compressive mechanical properties of human cortical bone. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  F. Taddei,et al.  Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Charles A. Rockwood,et al.  Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults , 1991 .

[12]  T. McMahon,et al.  Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  D R Carter,et al.  Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  M Martens,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of the long bones of the lower extremity in torsional loading. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R. Guedes,et al.  Viscoelastic behaviour and failure of bovine cancellous bone under constant strain rate. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[20]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint contact forces during stumbling , 2004, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[21]  King H. Yang,et al.  The relationship between loading conditions and fracture patterns of the proximal femur. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  In vitro replication of spontaneous fractures of the proximal human femur. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  A. Cappello,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Multiscale modelling of the skeleton for the prediction of the risk of fracture. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  F Eckstein,et al.  Mechanical strength of the proximal femur as predicted from geometric and densitometric bone properties at the lower limb versus the distal radius. , 2002, Bone.

[26]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  N. Sasaki,et al.  Stress relaxation function of bone and bone collagen. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  W. Liu,et al.  An intermediate loading rate technique for the determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[32]  R Van Audekercke,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[34]  T. Toridis,et al.  Stress analysis of the femur. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  M. Rooze,et al.  Theoretical Study of the Decrease in the Femoral Neck Anteversion during Growth , 2002, Cells Tissues Organs.

[37]  D. Raftopoulos,et al.  Three-dimensional curved beam stress analysis of the human femur. , 1987, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[38]  M Martens,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of femoral bones in bending loading. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  B P McNamara,et al.  A minimal parametric model of the femur to describe axial elastic strain in response to loads. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[40]  N Rushton,et al.  Proximal femoral surface strain gauge analysis of a new epiphyseal prosthesis. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[41]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Strain distribution in the proximal human femoral metaphysis , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[42]  C. Gans,et al.  Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress, and Growth , 1990 .

[43]  R. Lakes,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone--III. A non-linear constitutive equation. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  K. Taous,et al.  An experimental and theoretical approach of elasticity and viscoelasticity of compact and spongy bone with periodic homogenization , 2007, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[45]  T D Brown,et al.  Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.