Estimating the Number of Stroke Patients Eligible for Thrombolytic Treatment if Delay Could Be Avoided

Background: Although no data are available on the potential number of patients treatable with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, it is said that up to 20% of all stroke patients should receive this treatment. The actual percentage treated is much lower, mainly due to delays between onset and admission to hospital. The aim of this study was to estimate the potential number of patients eligible for thrombolytic therapy if such delays could be avoided. Methods: We gathered data on the time of onset, presentation and admission of stroke patients. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for thrombolysis derived from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke study, we retrospectively estimated the number of patients that would have been eligible for thrombolytic therapy. Results: A total of 263 consecutive patients were included. Forty-eight patients (18%) had symptoms upon awakening, 28 (11%) reported their symptoms at a routine follow-up visit and 19 (7%) received thrombolytic therapy. All these cases were excluded. If no delay had occurred, an additional 44 patients (17%) could have been offered thrombolytic therapy. This potential loss of treatable patients was due to patient and doctor delay in 39 and 2 patients, respectively, and to other reasons in 3 patients. Conclusion: Up to 24% of stroke patients are eligible for thrombolytic treatment if delay is avoided. As delays are mainly caused by patients themselves, the results of this study underline the need for campaigns to improve the public’s awareness of stroke symptoms as well as the awareness that stroke is an emergency situation.

[1]  S. Willich,et al.  Out-of-hospital delays in patients with acute stroke. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  Ku-Chou Chang,et al.  Prehospital Delay After Acute Stroke in Kaohsiung, Taiwan , 2004, Stroke.

[3]  D. Tanné,et al.  Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: the phase IV data. , 2001, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[4]  P. Wester,et al.  Factors associated with delayed admission to hospital and in-hospital delays in acute stroke and TIA: a prospective, multicenter study.Seek- Medical-Attention-in-Time Study Group. , 1999, Stroke.

[5]  Alfred J. Tuchfarber,et al.  Public perception of stroke warning signs and knowledge of potential risk factors. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Delay between Stroke Onset and Emergency Department Evaluation , 2001, Neuroepidemiology.

[7]  J. Martí-Fàbregas,et al.  Reasons for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy following acute ischemic stroke. , 2005, Neurology.

[8]  G Schlaug,et al.  Why are stroke patients excluded from tPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility , 2001, Neurology.

[9]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Poor Outcomes in Patients Who Do Not Receive Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Because of Mild or Improving Ischemic Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[10]  M. Hammer,et al.  Utilization of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[11]  Joseph P. Broderick,et al.  Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for minor strokes: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study experience. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  Joseph P. Broderick,et al.  Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. , 1995 .

[13]  W. Rosamond,et al.  Prehospital and Emergency Department Delays After Acute Stroke: The Genentech Stroke Presentation Survey , 2000, Stroke.

[14]  Kennedy R. Lees,et al.  Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Preliminary Experience with Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in the UK , 2005, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[15]  R. Luepker,et al.  Delayed Hospital Arrival for Acute Stroke: The Minnesota Stroke Survey , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Kelly R. Evenson,et al.  Prehospital and In-Hospital Delays in Acute Stroke Care , 2001, Neuroepidemiology.

[17]  P. Adeleine,et al.  Factors Influencing Early Admission in a French Stroke Unit , 2002, Stroke.

[18]  W. Rosamond,et al.  Determinants of Use of Emergency Medical Services in a Population With Stroke Symptoms: The Second Delay in Accessing Stroke Healthcare (DASH II) Study , 2000, Stroke.

[19]  J. Kostis,et al.  Delay in Presentation and Evaluation for Acute Stroke: Stroke Time Registry for Outcomes Knowledge and Epidemiology (S.T.R.O.K.E.) , 1997, Stroke.

[20]  A. Siegel,et al.  Good Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis Despite Regressing Neurological Symptoms , 2006, Stroke.

[21]  Jane C Khoury,et al.  Trends in community knowledge of the warning signs and risk factors for stroke. , 2003, JAMA.

[22]  Antoni Dávalos,et al.  Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Successes, Failures, and New Hopes , 2005, Cerebrovascular Diseases.