Group impacts using four meeting facilitation techniques

Many studies have investigated the effects of various meeting facilitation techniques on groups, but few have directly compared the effects of different electronic techniques on group interaction. In fact, the vast majority of research in the area of electronic meeting support has used only two techniques: verbal brainstorming and electronic individual poolwriting. This paper describes an experiment involving four groups of 35 undergraduate students each using electronic individual poolwriting, electronic gallery writing, verbal brainstorming, and manual individual poolwriting. Results show that groups using the two electronic techniques were more satisfied and productive and experienced less production blocking and evaluation apprehen­ sion. Although there were no significant differences in production blocking, evaluation appre­ hension, and the number of quality ideas generated between the two electronic techniques, groups were more satisfied with and preferred electronic gallery writing over electronic indi­ vidual poolwriting.

[1]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[2]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[3]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[4]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[5]  D. Madsen,et al.  Comparison of a written feedback procedure, group brainstorming, and individual brainstorming. , 1978 .

[6]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Systems: Evidence from a Low Structure Environment , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Group Decision Support System impact: Multi-methodological exploration , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Interaction of task and technology to support large groups , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using Two Different Electronic Meeting System Tools for the Same Task: An Experimental Comparison , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Managing Group Creativity: A Modular Approach to Problem Solving , 1984 .

[15]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Bonita L. Daly,et al.  The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction , 1993 .

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[18]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..