Participant Feedback in the Evaluation of Novel Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies

Purpose: Stroke participant perspectives are used to evaluate a novel rehabilitation system employing electrical stimulation (ES) technology combined with robotic assistance and virtual reality. The broader implications of such feedback for future technological development are discussed. Method: While supported by a robot, ES was applied to the triceps and anterior deltoid muscles of 5 chronic stroke participants with upper limb impairment to assist them in completing functional, virtual reality tracking tasks. Advanced ES controllers adjusted the amount of ES applied on each attempt to improve accuracy and maximise voluntary effort. The system was evaluated in terms of participants' perspectives, expressed during a semi-structured interview, and clinical outcome measures. Results: The rehabilitation system was well accepted by participants and viewed positively, despite mixed opinions regarding effectiveness. Feedback demonstrated an alignment in participants' perceptions of reduced impairment and clinical outcomes, in which a significant (p < 0.001) mean change of 9.3 in Fugl-Meyer scores was observed. Participant feedback also provided insight into individual differences observed in clinical outcomes. From our findings six key issues regarding effectiveness, muscles trained, system flexibility and portability, possible discomfort and the value of participant perspectives emerged that may be relevant for researchers developing new rehabilitation technologies. Conclusion: Participant feedback via a semi-structured interview provided important insight into the usability and effectiveness of using this system as a platform for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.

[1]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Tim Johansson,et al.  Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  Mary Y. Harley,et al.  Improving hand function in stroke survivors: a pilot study of contralaterally controlled functional electric stimulation in chronic hemiplegia. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Thomas Sinkjaer,et al.  Patients' perceptions of the benefits and problems of using the ActiGait implanted drop-foot stimulator. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  E. Rogers,et al.  Iterative Learning Control in Health Care: Electrical Stimulation and Robotic-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, IEEE Control Systems.

[6]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  E. Rogers,et al.  Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  Ananda Hochstenbach-Waelen,et al.  Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Ann-Marie Hughes,et al.  A model of the upper extremity using FES for stroke rehabilitation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Sensor-Based Arm Skill Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: Results on Treatment Outcome, Patient Motivation, and System Usability , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  P. Lehoux,et al.  A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  W. T. Ang,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitation engineering: a survey , 2007, i-CREATe '07.

[16]  S. Hesse,et al.  Arm studio to intensify the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: concept, acceptance, utilization and preliminary clinical results. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[18]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Stroke participants' perceptions of robotic and electrical stimulation therapy: a new approach , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[19]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Phase-lead iterative learning control algorithms for functional electrical stimulation-based stroke rehabilitation , 2011 .

[20]  Woon-fong Wallace Leung,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  S. Brauer,et al.  ‘Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: A survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia’ , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  M. Clark,et al.  Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with rehabilitation following stroke , 1998, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[23]  C. Granger,et al.  Manual Ability Measure (MAM-16): A Preliminary Report on a New Patient-Centred and Task-Oriented Outcome Measure of Hand Function , 2005, Journal of hand surgery.

[24]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[25]  M. Law,et al.  The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure , 2020 .

[26]  Kathryn M McPherson,et al.  Virtual reality games for rehabilitation: Perspectives from the users and new directions , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[27]  Jane Burridge,et al.  The Views of People with Spinal Cord Injury about the Use of Functional Electrical Stimulation , 2009 .