Pap smears in general practice: a secondary analysis of the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990 to 1991

Abstract: We investigated the characteristics of Australian general practice that predict performance of Pap smears by secondary analysis of the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990 to 1991. Chi–squared analysis identified potential associations between Pap smear rate and patient, doctor and practice variables. Significant associations were examined using logistic regression and generalised estimating equations. Participants were 495 general practitioners who collected information on 113 468 doctor–patient encounters, of which 43 211 encounters involved females aged 18 to 70 years. Pap smear encounters (2449) were identified and classified as patient–requested (62 per cent), diagnostic (5 per cent) or opportunistic (33 per cent). The large difference in the unadjusted Pap smear rates per 100 female encounters for female general practitioners (11.7) and male general practitioners (4.2) required separate analysis by sex of the general practitioner. For male general practitioners, a Pap smear was less likely: as patient age increased; for new patients; for general practitioners with less general practice experience; for general practitioners with no postgraduate qualifications; with metropolitan practice location; and if the practice had more than 25 per cent of patients with English as a second language. For female general practitioners, a Pap smear was less likely: for older known patients; as the age of the general practitioners increased; and for management of fewer problems per 100 encounters. A Pap smear was less likely to be opportunistic: as patient age increased; for general practitioners who were Australian graduates; and for general practitioners with no postgraduate qualifications. Consideration of patient, doctor, and general practice characteristics may facilitate the design of interventions to improve cervical cancer screening.

[1]  J. Straton,et al.  Cervical cancer screening in Western Australia in 1992: progress since 1983 , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[2]  C. Clancy,et al.  Physician Gender Bias in Clinical Decisionmaking: Screening for Cancer in Primary Care , 1993, Medical care.

[3]  C. Bridges‐Webb,et al.  Morbidity and treatment in general practice in Australia 1990–1991 , 1993, Australian family physician.

[4]  J. Dickinson Measuring the cost of nurse practitioners. , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[5]  M H Radany,et al.  Internists' practices in health promotion and disease prevention. A survey. , 2020, Annals of internal medicine.

[6]  R. Klein,et al.  Explaining outputs of primary health care: population and practice factors. , 1991, BMJ.

[7]  F. Olesen,et al.  General practice characteristics and use of Pap-smear. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[8]  M. Humphrey,et al.  Undergraduate Education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Australia and New Zealand, 1989 , 1990, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[9]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Performance Quality, Gender, and Professional Role: A Study of Physicians and Nonphysicians in 16 Ambulatory Care Practices , 1990, Medical care.

[10]  K. Waller Women doctors for women patients? , 1988, The British journal of medical psychology.

[11]  S. Robboy,et al.  Prevalence of dysplasia and cancer of the cervix in a nationwide, planned parenthood population , 1988, Cancer.

[12]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Cervical cancer mortality trends in Australia — an update , 1987, The Medical journal of Australia.

[13]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Cervical cytology in Western Australia: Frequency, geographical and socioeconomic distributions and providers of the service , 1986, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  A. Kopstein,et al.  Who is being screened for cervical cancer? , 1981, American journal of public health.

[15]  B. Bentsen,et al.  The accuracy of recording patient problems in family practice. , 1976, Journal of medical education.